Cargando…
When should researchers cite study differences in response to a failure to replicate?
Scientists often respond to failures to replicate by citing differences between the experimental components of an original study and those of its attempted replication. In this paper, we investigate these purported mismatch explanations. We assess a body of failures to replicate in neuroscience stud...
Autores principales: | Colaço, David, Bickle, John, Walters, Bradley |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9438886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36092533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10539-022-09873-y |
Ejemplares similares
-
When failure should be the option
por: Petsko, Gregory A
Publicado: (2010) -
On the advancement of highly cited research in China: An analysis of the Highly Cited database
por: Li, John Tianci
Publicado: (2018) -
Nonreplicable publications are cited more than replicable ones
por: Serra-Garcia, Marta, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
CITED1 confers stemness to Wilms tumor and enhances tumorigenic responses when enriched in the nucleus
por: Murphy, Andrew J., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Highly Cited Articles in Periacetabular Osteotomy Research
por: Cantrell, Colin K., et al.
Publicado: (2022)