Cargando…
Alpha-Blocker Prescribing Trends for Ureteral Stones: A Single-Centre Study
PURPOSE: Recommendations for alpha-blockers have shifted in the conservative management of ureteral stones. It is unknown whether real-life practices regarding alpha-blocker prescriptions reflect updates in evidence. This study aimed to characterise alpha-blocker prescriptions for conservatively man...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9439643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36060307 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S372208 |
_version_ | 1784782110687494144 |
---|---|
author | Qu, Liang G Chan, Garson Gani, Johan |
author_facet | Qu, Liang G Chan, Garson Gani, Johan |
author_sort | Qu, Liang G |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Recommendations for alpha-blockers have shifted in the conservative management of ureteral stones. It is unknown whether real-life practices regarding alpha-blocker prescriptions reflect updates in evidence. This study aimed to characterise alpha-blocker prescriptions for conservatively managed ureteral stones and relate this to recent literature. METHODS: This was a retrospective audit, 01/01/2014 to 01/01/2019, of emergency acute renal colic presentations. Patients were included if they had a confirmed ureteral stone and were conservatively managed. The rates of alpha-blocker prescriptions were analysed using interrupted time-series analyses. May 2015 was selected as the cut-point to analyse before and after trend lines. Results were stratified by stone size and location. Tamsulosin and prazosin prescriptions were also compared. RESULTS: This study included 2163 presentations: 70.4% were stones ≤5 mm and 61.4% were proximal stones. Altogether, 24.7% of presentations were prescribed alpha-blockers. There was a fall in alpha-blocker prescription rates from before to after May 2015, regardless of stone size or location (p < 0.001). Since May 2015, however, there was a monthly rate increase of 0.5% for patients with stones >5mm. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a significant shift in rates of alpha-blocker prescriptions, possibly related to the influence of updates in available high-quality evidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9439643 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94396432022-09-03 Alpha-Blocker Prescribing Trends for Ureteral Stones: A Single-Centre Study Qu, Liang G Chan, Garson Gani, Johan Res Rep Urol Original Research PURPOSE: Recommendations for alpha-blockers have shifted in the conservative management of ureteral stones. It is unknown whether real-life practices regarding alpha-blocker prescriptions reflect updates in evidence. This study aimed to characterise alpha-blocker prescriptions for conservatively managed ureteral stones and relate this to recent literature. METHODS: This was a retrospective audit, 01/01/2014 to 01/01/2019, of emergency acute renal colic presentations. Patients were included if they had a confirmed ureteral stone and were conservatively managed. The rates of alpha-blocker prescriptions were analysed using interrupted time-series analyses. May 2015 was selected as the cut-point to analyse before and after trend lines. Results were stratified by stone size and location. Tamsulosin and prazosin prescriptions were also compared. RESULTS: This study included 2163 presentations: 70.4% were stones ≤5 mm and 61.4% were proximal stones. Altogether, 24.7% of presentations were prescribed alpha-blockers. There was a fall in alpha-blocker prescription rates from before to after May 2015, regardless of stone size or location (p < 0.001). Since May 2015, however, there was a monthly rate increase of 0.5% for patients with stones >5mm. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a significant shift in rates of alpha-blocker prescriptions, possibly related to the influence of updates in available high-quality evidence. Dove 2022-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9439643/ /pubmed/36060307 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S372208 Text en © 2022 Qu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Qu, Liang G Chan, Garson Gani, Johan Alpha-Blocker Prescribing Trends for Ureteral Stones: A Single-Centre Study |
title | Alpha-Blocker Prescribing Trends for Ureteral Stones: A Single-Centre Study |
title_full | Alpha-Blocker Prescribing Trends for Ureteral Stones: A Single-Centre Study |
title_fullStr | Alpha-Blocker Prescribing Trends for Ureteral Stones: A Single-Centre Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Alpha-Blocker Prescribing Trends for Ureteral Stones: A Single-Centre Study |
title_short | Alpha-Blocker Prescribing Trends for Ureteral Stones: A Single-Centre Study |
title_sort | alpha-blocker prescribing trends for ureteral stones: a single-centre study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9439643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36060307 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S372208 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quliangg alphablockerprescribingtrendsforureteralstonesasinglecentrestudy AT changarson alphablockerprescribingtrendsforureteralstonesasinglecentrestudy AT ganijohan alphablockerprescribingtrendsforureteralstonesasinglecentrestudy |