Cargando…

Alpha-Blocker Prescribing Trends for Ureteral Stones: A Single-Centre Study

PURPOSE: Recommendations for alpha-blockers have shifted in the conservative management of ureteral stones. It is unknown whether real-life practices regarding alpha-blocker prescriptions reflect updates in evidence. This study aimed to characterise alpha-blocker prescriptions for conservatively man...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qu, Liang G, Chan, Garson, Gani, Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9439643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36060307
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S372208
_version_ 1784782110687494144
author Qu, Liang G
Chan, Garson
Gani, Johan
author_facet Qu, Liang G
Chan, Garson
Gani, Johan
author_sort Qu, Liang G
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Recommendations for alpha-blockers have shifted in the conservative management of ureteral stones. It is unknown whether real-life practices regarding alpha-blocker prescriptions reflect updates in evidence. This study aimed to characterise alpha-blocker prescriptions for conservatively managed ureteral stones and relate this to recent literature. METHODS: This was a retrospective audit, 01/01/2014 to 01/01/2019, of emergency acute renal colic presentations. Patients were included if they had a confirmed ureteral stone and were conservatively managed. The rates of alpha-blocker prescriptions were analysed using interrupted time-series analyses. May 2015 was selected as the cut-point to analyse before and after trend lines. Results were stratified by stone size and location. Tamsulosin and prazosin prescriptions were also compared. RESULTS: This study included 2163 presentations: 70.4% were stones ≤5 mm and 61.4% were proximal stones. Altogether, 24.7% of presentations were prescribed alpha-blockers. There was a fall in alpha-blocker prescription rates from before to after May 2015, regardless of stone size or location (p < 0.001). Since May 2015, however, there was a monthly rate increase of 0.5% for patients with stones >5mm. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a significant shift in rates of alpha-blocker prescriptions, possibly related to the influence of updates in available high-quality evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9439643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94396432022-09-03 Alpha-Blocker Prescribing Trends for Ureteral Stones: A Single-Centre Study Qu, Liang G Chan, Garson Gani, Johan Res Rep Urol Original Research PURPOSE: Recommendations for alpha-blockers have shifted in the conservative management of ureteral stones. It is unknown whether real-life practices regarding alpha-blocker prescriptions reflect updates in evidence. This study aimed to characterise alpha-blocker prescriptions for conservatively managed ureteral stones and relate this to recent literature. METHODS: This was a retrospective audit, 01/01/2014 to 01/01/2019, of emergency acute renal colic presentations. Patients were included if they had a confirmed ureteral stone and were conservatively managed. The rates of alpha-blocker prescriptions were analysed using interrupted time-series analyses. May 2015 was selected as the cut-point to analyse before and after trend lines. Results were stratified by stone size and location. Tamsulosin and prazosin prescriptions were also compared. RESULTS: This study included 2163 presentations: 70.4% were stones ≤5 mm and 61.4% were proximal stones. Altogether, 24.7% of presentations were prescribed alpha-blockers. There was a fall in alpha-blocker prescription rates from before to after May 2015, regardless of stone size or location (p < 0.001). Since May 2015, however, there was a monthly rate increase of 0.5% for patients with stones >5mm. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a significant shift in rates of alpha-blocker prescriptions, possibly related to the influence of updates in available high-quality evidence. Dove 2022-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9439643/ /pubmed/36060307 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S372208 Text en © 2022 Qu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Qu, Liang G
Chan, Garson
Gani, Johan
Alpha-Blocker Prescribing Trends for Ureteral Stones: A Single-Centre Study
title Alpha-Blocker Prescribing Trends for Ureteral Stones: A Single-Centre Study
title_full Alpha-Blocker Prescribing Trends for Ureteral Stones: A Single-Centre Study
title_fullStr Alpha-Blocker Prescribing Trends for Ureteral Stones: A Single-Centre Study
title_full_unstemmed Alpha-Blocker Prescribing Trends for Ureteral Stones: A Single-Centre Study
title_short Alpha-Blocker Prescribing Trends for Ureteral Stones: A Single-Centre Study
title_sort alpha-blocker prescribing trends for ureteral stones: a single-centre study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9439643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36060307
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S372208
work_keys_str_mv AT quliangg alphablockerprescribingtrendsforureteralstonesasinglecentrestudy
AT changarson alphablockerprescribingtrendsforureteralstonesasinglecentrestudy
AT ganijohan alphablockerprescribingtrendsforureteralstonesasinglecentrestudy