Cargando…

The Chinese knotting technique assist anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for aggressive rehabilitation

Aggressive rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction may result in better clinical outcomes and fewer complications such as knee stiffness and weakness. We explored the effect of the Chinese knotting technique (CKT) for aggressive rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. N...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Yang, Yang, Xianguang, He, Chuan, Wang, Guoliang, Liu, Dejian, Li, Yanlin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9439741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36107515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030107
Descripción
Sumario:Aggressive rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction may result in better clinical outcomes and fewer complications such as knee stiffness and weakness. We explored the effect of the Chinese knotting technique (CKT) for aggressive rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. Ninety-one anatomical ACL reconstruction cases from 2016 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were operated by the same senior physician and his team. According to the reconstruction with or without CKT, the patients were divided into 2 groups. Both groups received aggressive rehabilitation. The follow-up time of 91 patients was more than 2 years. In total, 43 out of the 91 patients were in the CKT group, and 48 were in the routine group. The knee joint kinematics recorded by Opti_Knee revealed no significant difference among the CKT group, the routine group, and healthy adults at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the operation, respectively. The internal and external rotation angle and the anteroposterior displacement at 3 and 6 months after the operation in the CKT group were smaller than in the routine group and were similar to that of the healthy adults. There was no significant difference in flexion and extension angle, varus or valgus angle, proximal–distal displacement, or the internal or external displacement between the 2 groups. In addition, there was no significant difference in 6 degrees of freedom of the knee between the 2 groups at 12 and 24 months after the operation, respectively, which was similar to healthy adults. Compared to the routine group, the International Knee Documentation Committee scores were significantly higher in the CKT group at the 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively, but no difference was observed at 24 months (P = .749). The Lysholm score was significantly higher in the CKT group at the 3 and 6 months postoperatively, while there was no difference at 12 and 24 months, respectively. In short-term observation, the ACL reconstruction with CKT, which can sustain aggressive rehabilitation and prevent the loosening of ACL graft, can lead to better clinical outcomes and kinematics recovery of the knee compared to routine technique.