Cargando…
Cost-Utility of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Melanoma in the United States: An Analysis Using Long-Term Overall Survival Data from Checkmate 067
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-utility of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) versus other first-line therapies for advanced melanoma in the United States (US) from the third-party payer perspective. METHODS: This analysis estimated total expected life-years (LYs), qual...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9440167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36006606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-022-00348-0 |
_version_ | 1784782274075557888 |
---|---|
author | Baker, Timothy Johnson, Helen Kotapati, Srividya Moshyk, Andriy Hamilton, Melissa Kurt, Murat Paly, Victoria Federico |
author_facet | Baker, Timothy Johnson, Helen Kotapati, Srividya Moshyk, Andriy Hamilton, Melissa Kurt, Murat Paly, Victoria Federico |
author_sort | Baker, Timothy |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-utility of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) versus other first-line therapies for advanced melanoma in the United States (US) from the third-party payer perspective. METHODS: This analysis estimated total expected life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and costs for first-line treatments of advanced melanoma during a 30-year time horizon using indirect treatment comparisons based on time-varying hazard ratios (HRs) and a three-state partitioned survival model. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival reference curves were extrapolated based on 5-year follow-up from the phase III Checkmate 067 trial (NCT01844505). Comparators of NIVO + IPI were NIVO, IPI, pembrolizumab, dabrafenib plus trametinib, encorafenib plus binimetinib (ENCO + BINI), and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib. Drug acquisition costs, treatment administration costs, follow-up time, subsequent therapy data, and adverse event frequencies were obtained from published sources. Utility weights were estimated from Checkmate 067, which compared NIVO + IPI or NIVO monotherapy with IPI monotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced melanoma. A 3% annual discount rate was applied to costs and outcomes. Sensitivity scenarios for BRAF-mutant subgroups were conducted. RESULTS: NIVO + IPI was estimated to generate the longest OS and the highest total costs versus all comparators, accruing 6.99 LYs, 5.70 QALYs, and $469,469 over the 30-year time horizon. The incremental cost utility of NIVO + IPI versus comparators ranged from $2130 per QALY (versus ENCO + BINI) to $76,169 per QALY (versus NIVO). In all base-case and most sensitivity analyses, the incremental cost-utility ratios for NIVO + IPI were below $100,000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: NIVO + IPI is estimated to be a life-extending and cost-effective treatment versus other therapies in the US, with base-case incremental cost-utility ratios below $100,000 per QALY. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41669-022-00348-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9440167 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94401672022-09-04 Cost-Utility of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Melanoma in the United States: An Analysis Using Long-Term Overall Survival Data from Checkmate 067 Baker, Timothy Johnson, Helen Kotapati, Srividya Moshyk, Andriy Hamilton, Melissa Kurt, Murat Paly, Victoria Federico Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-utility of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) versus other first-line therapies for advanced melanoma in the United States (US) from the third-party payer perspective. METHODS: This analysis estimated total expected life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and costs for first-line treatments of advanced melanoma during a 30-year time horizon using indirect treatment comparisons based on time-varying hazard ratios (HRs) and a three-state partitioned survival model. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival reference curves were extrapolated based on 5-year follow-up from the phase III Checkmate 067 trial (NCT01844505). Comparators of NIVO + IPI were NIVO, IPI, pembrolizumab, dabrafenib plus trametinib, encorafenib plus binimetinib (ENCO + BINI), and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib. Drug acquisition costs, treatment administration costs, follow-up time, subsequent therapy data, and adverse event frequencies were obtained from published sources. Utility weights were estimated from Checkmate 067, which compared NIVO + IPI or NIVO monotherapy with IPI monotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced melanoma. A 3% annual discount rate was applied to costs and outcomes. Sensitivity scenarios for BRAF-mutant subgroups were conducted. RESULTS: NIVO + IPI was estimated to generate the longest OS and the highest total costs versus all comparators, accruing 6.99 LYs, 5.70 QALYs, and $469,469 over the 30-year time horizon. The incremental cost utility of NIVO + IPI versus comparators ranged from $2130 per QALY (versus ENCO + BINI) to $76,169 per QALY (versus NIVO). In all base-case and most sensitivity analyses, the incremental cost-utility ratios for NIVO + IPI were below $100,000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: NIVO + IPI is estimated to be a life-extending and cost-effective treatment versus other therapies in the US, with base-case incremental cost-utility ratios below $100,000 per QALY. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41669-022-00348-0. Springer International Publishing 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9440167/ /pubmed/36006606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-022-00348-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Baker, Timothy Johnson, Helen Kotapati, Srividya Moshyk, Andriy Hamilton, Melissa Kurt, Murat Paly, Victoria Federico Cost-Utility of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Melanoma in the United States: An Analysis Using Long-Term Overall Survival Data from Checkmate 067 |
title | Cost-Utility of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Melanoma in the United States: An Analysis Using Long-Term Overall Survival Data from Checkmate 067 |
title_full | Cost-Utility of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Melanoma in the United States: An Analysis Using Long-Term Overall Survival Data from Checkmate 067 |
title_fullStr | Cost-Utility of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Melanoma in the United States: An Analysis Using Long-Term Overall Survival Data from Checkmate 067 |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-Utility of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Melanoma in the United States: An Analysis Using Long-Term Overall Survival Data from Checkmate 067 |
title_short | Cost-Utility of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in First-Line Treatment of Advanced Melanoma in the United States: An Analysis Using Long-Term Overall Survival Data from Checkmate 067 |
title_sort | cost-utility of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in first-line treatment of advanced melanoma in the united states: an analysis using long-term overall survival data from checkmate 067 |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9440167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36006606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-022-00348-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bakertimothy costutilityofnivolumabplusipilimumabinfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedmelanomaintheunitedstatesananalysisusinglongtermoverallsurvivaldatafromcheckmate067 AT johnsonhelen costutilityofnivolumabplusipilimumabinfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedmelanomaintheunitedstatesananalysisusinglongtermoverallsurvivaldatafromcheckmate067 AT kotapatisrividya costutilityofnivolumabplusipilimumabinfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedmelanomaintheunitedstatesananalysisusinglongtermoverallsurvivaldatafromcheckmate067 AT moshykandriy costutilityofnivolumabplusipilimumabinfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedmelanomaintheunitedstatesananalysisusinglongtermoverallsurvivaldatafromcheckmate067 AT hamiltonmelissa costutilityofnivolumabplusipilimumabinfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedmelanomaintheunitedstatesananalysisusinglongtermoverallsurvivaldatafromcheckmate067 AT kurtmurat costutilityofnivolumabplusipilimumabinfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedmelanomaintheunitedstatesananalysisusinglongtermoverallsurvivaldatafromcheckmate067 AT palyvictoriafederico costutilityofnivolumabplusipilimumabinfirstlinetreatmentofadvancedmelanomaintheunitedstatesananalysisusinglongtermoverallsurvivaldatafromcheckmate067 |