Cargando…
Cost-Utility Analysis of Planned Early Delivery or Expectant Management for Late Preterm Pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX)
AIM: There is currently limited evidence on the costs associated with late preterm pre-eclampsia beyond antenatal care and post-natal discharge from hospital. The aim of this analysis is to evaluate the 24-month cost-utility of planned delivery for women with late preterm pre-eclampsia at 34(+0)–36(...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9440173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35861912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-022-00355-1 |
_version_ | 1784782278242598912 |
---|---|
author | Hunter, Rachael Beardmore-Gray, Alice Greenland, Melanie Linsell, Louise Juszczak, Edmund Hardy, Pollyanna Placzek, Anna Shennan, Andrew Marlow, Neil Chappell, Lucy C. |
author_facet | Hunter, Rachael Beardmore-Gray, Alice Greenland, Melanie Linsell, Louise Juszczak, Edmund Hardy, Pollyanna Placzek, Anna Shennan, Andrew Marlow, Neil Chappell, Lucy C. |
author_sort | Hunter, Rachael |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: There is currently limited evidence on the costs associated with late preterm pre-eclampsia beyond antenatal care and post-natal discharge from hospital. The aim of this analysis is to evaluate the 24-month cost-utility of planned delivery for women with late preterm pre-eclampsia at 34(+0)–36(+6) weeks’ gestation compared to expectant management from an English National Health Service perspective using participant-level data from the PHOENIX trial. METHODS: Women between 34(+0) and 36(+6) weeks’ gestation in 46 maternity units in England and Wales were individually randomised to planned delivery or expectant management. Resource use was collected from hospital records between randomisation and primary hospital discharge following birth. Women were followed up at 6 months and 24 months following birth and self-reported resource use for themselves and their infant(s) covering the previous 6 months. Women completed the EQ-5D 5L at randomisation and follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 450 women were randomised to planned delivery, 451 to expectant management: 187 and 170 women, respectively, had complete data at 24 months. Planned delivery resulted in a significantly lower mean cost per woman and infant(s) over 24 months (− £2711, 95% confidence interval (CI) − 4840 to − 637), with a mean incremental difference in QALYs of 0.019 (95% CI − 0.039 to 0.063). Short-term and 24-month infant costs were not significantly different between the intervention arms. There is a 99% probability that planned delivery is cost-effective at all thresholds below £37,000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSION: There is a high probability that planned delivery is cost-effective compared to expectant management. These results need to be considered alongside clinical outcomes and in the wider context of maternity care. Trial registration: ISRCTN registry ISRCTN01879376. Registered 25 November 2013. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41669-022-00355-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9440173 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94401732022-09-04 Cost-Utility Analysis of Planned Early Delivery or Expectant Management for Late Preterm Pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX) Hunter, Rachael Beardmore-Gray, Alice Greenland, Melanie Linsell, Louise Juszczak, Edmund Hardy, Pollyanna Placzek, Anna Shennan, Andrew Marlow, Neil Chappell, Lucy C. Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article AIM: There is currently limited evidence on the costs associated with late preterm pre-eclampsia beyond antenatal care and post-natal discharge from hospital. The aim of this analysis is to evaluate the 24-month cost-utility of planned delivery for women with late preterm pre-eclampsia at 34(+0)–36(+6) weeks’ gestation compared to expectant management from an English National Health Service perspective using participant-level data from the PHOENIX trial. METHODS: Women between 34(+0) and 36(+6) weeks’ gestation in 46 maternity units in England and Wales were individually randomised to planned delivery or expectant management. Resource use was collected from hospital records between randomisation and primary hospital discharge following birth. Women were followed up at 6 months and 24 months following birth and self-reported resource use for themselves and their infant(s) covering the previous 6 months. Women completed the EQ-5D 5L at randomisation and follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 450 women were randomised to planned delivery, 451 to expectant management: 187 and 170 women, respectively, had complete data at 24 months. Planned delivery resulted in a significantly lower mean cost per woman and infant(s) over 24 months (− £2711, 95% confidence interval (CI) − 4840 to − 637), with a mean incremental difference in QALYs of 0.019 (95% CI − 0.039 to 0.063). Short-term and 24-month infant costs were not significantly different between the intervention arms. There is a 99% probability that planned delivery is cost-effective at all thresholds below £37,000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSION: There is a high probability that planned delivery is cost-effective compared to expectant management. These results need to be considered alongside clinical outcomes and in the wider context of maternity care. Trial registration: ISRCTN registry ISRCTN01879376. Registered 25 November 2013. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41669-022-00355-1. Springer International Publishing 2022-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9440173/ /pubmed/35861912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-022-00355-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Hunter, Rachael Beardmore-Gray, Alice Greenland, Melanie Linsell, Louise Juszczak, Edmund Hardy, Pollyanna Placzek, Anna Shennan, Andrew Marlow, Neil Chappell, Lucy C. Cost-Utility Analysis of Planned Early Delivery or Expectant Management for Late Preterm Pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX) |
title | Cost-Utility Analysis of Planned Early Delivery or Expectant Management for Late Preterm Pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX) |
title_full | Cost-Utility Analysis of Planned Early Delivery or Expectant Management for Late Preterm Pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX) |
title_fullStr | Cost-Utility Analysis of Planned Early Delivery or Expectant Management for Late Preterm Pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX) |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-Utility Analysis of Planned Early Delivery or Expectant Management for Late Preterm Pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX) |
title_short | Cost-Utility Analysis of Planned Early Delivery or Expectant Management for Late Preterm Pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX) |
title_sort | cost-utility analysis of planned early delivery or expectant management for late preterm pre-eclampsia (phoenix) |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9440173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35861912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-022-00355-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hunterrachael costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix AT beardmoregrayalice costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix AT greenlandmelanie costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix AT linselllouise costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix AT juszczakedmund costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix AT hardypollyanna costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix AT placzekanna costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix AT shennanandrew costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix AT marlowneil costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix AT chappelllucyc costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix AT costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix |