Cargando…

Cost-Utility Analysis of Planned Early Delivery or Expectant Management for Late Preterm Pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX)

AIM: There is currently limited evidence on the costs associated with late preterm pre-eclampsia beyond antenatal care and post-natal discharge from hospital. The aim of this analysis is to evaluate the 24-month cost-utility of planned delivery for women with late preterm pre-eclampsia at 34(+0)–36(...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hunter, Rachael, Beardmore-Gray, Alice, Greenland, Melanie, Linsell, Louise, Juszczak, Edmund, Hardy, Pollyanna, Placzek, Anna, Shennan, Andrew, Marlow, Neil, Chappell, Lucy C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9440173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35861912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-022-00355-1
_version_ 1784782278242598912
author Hunter, Rachael
Beardmore-Gray, Alice
Greenland, Melanie
Linsell, Louise
Juszczak, Edmund
Hardy, Pollyanna
Placzek, Anna
Shennan, Andrew
Marlow, Neil
Chappell, Lucy C.
author_facet Hunter, Rachael
Beardmore-Gray, Alice
Greenland, Melanie
Linsell, Louise
Juszczak, Edmund
Hardy, Pollyanna
Placzek, Anna
Shennan, Andrew
Marlow, Neil
Chappell, Lucy C.
author_sort Hunter, Rachael
collection PubMed
description AIM: There is currently limited evidence on the costs associated with late preterm pre-eclampsia beyond antenatal care and post-natal discharge from hospital. The aim of this analysis is to evaluate the 24-month cost-utility of planned delivery for women with late preterm pre-eclampsia at 34(+0)–36(+6) weeks’ gestation compared to expectant management from an English National Health Service perspective using participant-level data from the PHOENIX trial. METHODS: Women between 34(+0) and 36(+6) weeks’ gestation in 46 maternity units in England and Wales were individually randomised to planned delivery or expectant management. Resource use was collected from hospital records between randomisation and primary hospital discharge following birth. Women were followed up at 6 months and 24 months following birth and self-reported resource use for themselves and their infant(s) covering the previous 6 months. Women completed the EQ-5D 5L at randomisation and follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 450 women were randomised to planned delivery, 451 to expectant management: 187 and 170 women, respectively, had complete data at 24 months. Planned delivery resulted in a significantly lower mean cost per woman and infant(s) over 24 months (− £2711, 95% confidence interval (CI) − 4840 to − 637), with a mean incremental difference in QALYs of 0.019 (95% CI − 0.039 to 0.063). Short-term and 24-month infant costs were not significantly different between the intervention arms. There is a 99% probability that planned delivery is cost-effective at all thresholds below £37,000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSION: There is a high probability that planned delivery is cost-effective compared to expectant management. These results need to be considered alongside clinical outcomes and in the wider context of maternity care. Trial registration: ISRCTN registry ISRCTN01879376. Registered 25 November 2013. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41669-022-00355-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9440173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94401732022-09-04 Cost-Utility Analysis of Planned Early Delivery or Expectant Management for Late Preterm Pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX) Hunter, Rachael Beardmore-Gray, Alice Greenland, Melanie Linsell, Louise Juszczak, Edmund Hardy, Pollyanna Placzek, Anna Shennan, Andrew Marlow, Neil Chappell, Lucy C. Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article AIM: There is currently limited evidence on the costs associated with late preterm pre-eclampsia beyond antenatal care and post-natal discharge from hospital. The aim of this analysis is to evaluate the 24-month cost-utility of planned delivery for women with late preterm pre-eclampsia at 34(+0)–36(+6) weeks’ gestation compared to expectant management from an English National Health Service perspective using participant-level data from the PHOENIX trial. METHODS: Women between 34(+0) and 36(+6) weeks’ gestation in 46 maternity units in England and Wales were individually randomised to planned delivery or expectant management. Resource use was collected from hospital records between randomisation and primary hospital discharge following birth. Women were followed up at 6 months and 24 months following birth and self-reported resource use for themselves and their infant(s) covering the previous 6 months. Women completed the EQ-5D 5L at randomisation and follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 450 women were randomised to planned delivery, 451 to expectant management: 187 and 170 women, respectively, had complete data at 24 months. Planned delivery resulted in a significantly lower mean cost per woman and infant(s) over 24 months (− £2711, 95% confidence interval (CI) − 4840 to − 637), with a mean incremental difference in QALYs of 0.019 (95% CI − 0.039 to 0.063). Short-term and 24-month infant costs were not significantly different between the intervention arms. There is a 99% probability that planned delivery is cost-effective at all thresholds below £37,000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSION: There is a high probability that planned delivery is cost-effective compared to expectant management. These results need to be considered alongside clinical outcomes and in the wider context of maternity care. Trial registration: ISRCTN registry ISRCTN01879376. Registered 25 November 2013. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41669-022-00355-1. Springer International Publishing 2022-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9440173/ /pubmed/35861912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-022-00355-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Hunter, Rachael
Beardmore-Gray, Alice
Greenland, Melanie
Linsell, Louise
Juszczak, Edmund
Hardy, Pollyanna
Placzek, Anna
Shennan, Andrew
Marlow, Neil
Chappell, Lucy C.
Cost-Utility Analysis of Planned Early Delivery or Expectant Management for Late Preterm Pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX)
title Cost-Utility Analysis of Planned Early Delivery or Expectant Management for Late Preterm Pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX)
title_full Cost-Utility Analysis of Planned Early Delivery or Expectant Management for Late Preterm Pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX)
title_fullStr Cost-Utility Analysis of Planned Early Delivery or Expectant Management for Late Preterm Pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX)
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Utility Analysis of Planned Early Delivery or Expectant Management for Late Preterm Pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX)
title_short Cost-Utility Analysis of Planned Early Delivery or Expectant Management for Late Preterm Pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX)
title_sort cost-utility analysis of planned early delivery or expectant management for late preterm pre-eclampsia (phoenix)
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9440173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35861912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-022-00355-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hunterrachael costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix
AT beardmoregrayalice costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix
AT greenlandmelanie costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix
AT linselllouise costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix
AT juszczakedmund costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix
AT hardypollyanna costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix
AT placzekanna costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix
AT shennanandrew costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix
AT marlowneil costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix
AT chappelllucyc costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix
AT costutilityanalysisofplannedearlydeliveryorexpectantmanagementforlatepretermpreeclampsiaphoenix