Cargando…
Development and internal validation of a machine learning prediction model for low back pain non-recovery in patients with an acute episode consulting a physiotherapist in primary care
BACKGROUND: While low back pain occurs in nearly everybody and is the leading cause of disability worldwide, we lack instruments to accurately predict persistence of acute low back pain. We aimed to develop and internally validate a machine learning model predicting non-recovery in acute low back pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9440317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36057717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05718-7 |
_version_ | 1784782317273743360 |
---|---|
author | Knoop, J. van Lankveld, W. Beijer, L. Geerdink, F. J. B. Heymans, M. W. Hoogeboom, T. J. Hoppenbrouwers, S. van Overmeeren, E. Soer, R. Veenhof, C. Vissers, K. C. P. van der Wees, P. J. Sappelli, M. Staal, J. B. |
author_facet | Knoop, J. van Lankveld, W. Beijer, L. Geerdink, F. J. B. Heymans, M. W. Hoogeboom, T. J. Hoppenbrouwers, S. van Overmeeren, E. Soer, R. Veenhof, C. Vissers, K. C. P. van der Wees, P. J. Sappelli, M. Staal, J. B. |
author_sort | Knoop, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While low back pain occurs in nearly everybody and is the leading cause of disability worldwide, we lack instruments to accurately predict persistence of acute low back pain. We aimed to develop and internally validate a machine learning model predicting non-recovery in acute low back pain and to compare this with current practice and ‘traditional’ prediction modeling. METHODS: Prognostic cohort-study in primary care physiotherapy. Patients (n = 247) with acute low back pain (≤ one month) consulting physiotherapists were included. Candidate predictors were assessed by questionnaire at baseline and (to capture early recovery) after one and two weeks. Primary outcome was non-recovery after three months, defined as at least mild pain (Numeric Rating Scale > 2/10). Machine learning models to predict non-recovery were developed and internally validated, and compared with two current practices in physiotherapy (STarT Back tool and physiotherapists’ expectation) and ‘traditional’ logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Forty-seven percent of the participants did not recover at three months. The best performing machine learning model showed acceptable predictive performance (area under the curve: 0.66). Although this was no better than a’traditional’ logistic regression model, it outperformed current practice. CONCLUSIONS: We developed two prognostic models containing partially different predictors, with acceptable performance for predicting (non-)recovery in patients with acute LBP, which was better than current practice. Our prognostic models have the potential of integration in a clinical decision support system to facilitate data-driven, personalized treatment of acute low back pain, but needs external validation first. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05718-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9440317 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94403172022-09-04 Development and internal validation of a machine learning prediction model for low back pain non-recovery in patients with an acute episode consulting a physiotherapist in primary care Knoop, J. van Lankveld, W. Beijer, L. Geerdink, F. J. B. Heymans, M. W. Hoogeboom, T. J. Hoppenbrouwers, S. van Overmeeren, E. Soer, R. Veenhof, C. Vissers, K. C. P. van der Wees, P. J. Sappelli, M. Staal, J. B. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: While low back pain occurs in nearly everybody and is the leading cause of disability worldwide, we lack instruments to accurately predict persistence of acute low back pain. We aimed to develop and internally validate a machine learning model predicting non-recovery in acute low back pain and to compare this with current practice and ‘traditional’ prediction modeling. METHODS: Prognostic cohort-study in primary care physiotherapy. Patients (n = 247) with acute low back pain (≤ one month) consulting physiotherapists were included. Candidate predictors were assessed by questionnaire at baseline and (to capture early recovery) after one and two weeks. Primary outcome was non-recovery after three months, defined as at least mild pain (Numeric Rating Scale > 2/10). Machine learning models to predict non-recovery were developed and internally validated, and compared with two current practices in physiotherapy (STarT Back tool and physiotherapists’ expectation) and ‘traditional’ logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Forty-seven percent of the participants did not recover at three months. The best performing machine learning model showed acceptable predictive performance (area under the curve: 0.66). Although this was no better than a’traditional’ logistic regression model, it outperformed current practice. CONCLUSIONS: We developed two prognostic models containing partially different predictors, with acceptable performance for predicting (non-)recovery in patients with acute LBP, which was better than current practice. Our prognostic models have the potential of integration in a clinical decision support system to facilitate data-driven, personalized treatment of acute low back pain, but needs external validation first. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05718-7. BioMed Central 2022-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9440317/ /pubmed/36057717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05718-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Knoop, J. van Lankveld, W. Beijer, L. Geerdink, F. J. B. Heymans, M. W. Hoogeboom, T. J. Hoppenbrouwers, S. van Overmeeren, E. Soer, R. Veenhof, C. Vissers, K. C. P. van der Wees, P. J. Sappelli, M. Staal, J. B. Development and internal validation of a machine learning prediction model for low back pain non-recovery in patients with an acute episode consulting a physiotherapist in primary care |
title | Development and internal validation of a machine learning prediction model for low back pain non-recovery in patients with an acute episode consulting a physiotherapist in primary care |
title_full | Development and internal validation of a machine learning prediction model for low back pain non-recovery in patients with an acute episode consulting a physiotherapist in primary care |
title_fullStr | Development and internal validation of a machine learning prediction model for low back pain non-recovery in patients with an acute episode consulting a physiotherapist in primary care |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and internal validation of a machine learning prediction model for low back pain non-recovery in patients with an acute episode consulting a physiotherapist in primary care |
title_short | Development and internal validation of a machine learning prediction model for low back pain non-recovery in patients with an acute episode consulting a physiotherapist in primary care |
title_sort | development and internal validation of a machine learning prediction model for low back pain non-recovery in patients with an acute episode consulting a physiotherapist in primary care |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9440317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36057717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05718-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT knoopj developmentandinternalvalidationofamachinelearningpredictionmodelforlowbackpainnonrecoveryinpatientswithanacuteepisodeconsultingaphysiotherapistinprimarycare AT vanlankveldw developmentandinternalvalidationofamachinelearningpredictionmodelforlowbackpainnonrecoveryinpatientswithanacuteepisodeconsultingaphysiotherapistinprimarycare AT beijerl developmentandinternalvalidationofamachinelearningpredictionmodelforlowbackpainnonrecoveryinpatientswithanacuteepisodeconsultingaphysiotherapistinprimarycare AT geerdinkfjb developmentandinternalvalidationofamachinelearningpredictionmodelforlowbackpainnonrecoveryinpatientswithanacuteepisodeconsultingaphysiotherapistinprimarycare AT heymansmw developmentandinternalvalidationofamachinelearningpredictionmodelforlowbackpainnonrecoveryinpatientswithanacuteepisodeconsultingaphysiotherapistinprimarycare AT hoogeboomtj developmentandinternalvalidationofamachinelearningpredictionmodelforlowbackpainnonrecoveryinpatientswithanacuteepisodeconsultingaphysiotherapistinprimarycare AT hoppenbrouwerss developmentandinternalvalidationofamachinelearningpredictionmodelforlowbackpainnonrecoveryinpatientswithanacuteepisodeconsultingaphysiotherapistinprimarycare AT vanovermeerene developmentandinternalvalidationofamachinelearningpredictionmodelforlowbackpainnonrecoveryinpatientswithanacuteepisodeconsultingaphysiotherapistinprimarycare AT soerr developmentandinternalvalidationofamachinelearningpredictionmodelforlowbackpainnonrecoveryinpatientswithanacuteepisodeconsultingaphysiotherapistinprimarycare AT veenhofc developmentandinternalvalidationofamachinelearningpredictionmodelforlowbackpainnonrecoveryinpatientswithanacuteepisodeconsultingaphysiotherapistinprimarycare AT visserskcp developmentandinternalvalidationofamachinelearningpredictionmodelforlowbackpainnonrecoveryinpatientswithanacuteepisodeconsultingaphysiotherapistinprimarycare AT vanderweespj developmentandinternalvalidationofamachinelearningpredictionmodelforlowbackpainnonrecoveryinpatientswithanacuteepisodeconsultingaphysiotherapistinprimarycare AT sappellim developmentandinternalvalidationofamachinelearningpredictionmodelforlowbackpainnonrecoveryinpatientswithanacuteepisodeconsultingaphysiotherapistinprimarycare AT staaljb developmentandinternalvalidationofamachinelearningpredictionmodelforlowbackpainnonrecoveryinpatientswithanacuteepisodeconsultingaphysiotherapistinprimarycare |