Cargando…
A trial of intra-pleural bacterial immunotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma (TILT) — a randomised feasibility study using the trial within a cohort (TwiC) methodology
BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive thoracic malignancy with a poor prognosis. Systemic immunotherapy is an effective frontline treatment for MPM, and there is a scientific rationale supporting the possible efficacy of local, i.e. intra-pleural immune modulators. Trial...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9440504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36057634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01156-3 |
_version_ | 1784782366677401600 |
---|---|
author | Bibby, Anna C. Zahan-Evans, Natalie Keenan, Emma Comins, Charles Harvey, John E. Day, Helen Rahman, Najib M. Fallon, Janet E. Gooberman-Hill, Rachael Maskell, Nick A. |
author_facet | Bibby, Anna C. Zahan-Evans, Natalie Keenan, Emma Comins, Charles Harvey, John E. Day, Helen Rahman, Najib M. Fallon, Janet E. Gooberman-Hill, Rachael Maskell, Nick A. |
author_sort | Bibby, Anna C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive thoracic malignancy with a poor prognosis. Systemic immunotherapy is an effective frontline treatment for MPM, and there is a scientific rationale supporting the possible efficacy of local, i.e. intra-pleural immune modulators. Trial of intra-pleural bacterial immunotherapy (TILT) investigated the feasibility of performing a randomised trial of intra-pleural bacterial immunotherapy in people with MPM, using the trials within cohorts (TwiC) methodology. METHODS: TILT was a multicentre, three-armed, randomised, feasibility TwiC of intra-pleural OK432, BCG, or usual care in people with MPM. Eligible participants were identified from within the ASSESS-meso study, a prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study, and were randomly selected to be offered a single dose of OK432 or BCG, via an indwelling pleural catheter. The primary outcome was feasibility, evaluated against prespecified recruitment, attrition and data completeness targets. The acceptability of trial processes and interventions was assessed during qualitative interviews with participants and family members at the end of the trial. TILT was registered prospectively on the European Clinical Trials Registry (EudraCT number 2016–004,727-23) and the ISRCTN Register on 04 December 2017. RESULTS: Seven participants were randomised from a planned sample size of 12; thus, the 66% recruitment rate target was not met. Two participants withdrew after randomisation, breaching the pre-stated attrition threshold of 10%. It was not possible to maintain blinding of control participants, which negated a fundamental tenet of the TwiC design. The trial processes and methodology were generally acceptable to participants and relatives, despite several recipients of intra-pleural bacterial agents experiencing significant local and systemic inflammatory responses. CONCLUSION: It was possible to design a clinical trial of an investigational medicinal product based on the TwiC design and to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals. However, whilst acceptable to participants and relatives, the TwiC design was not a feasible method of investigating intra-pleural bacterial immunotherapy in people with MPM. Future trials investigating this topic should consider the eligibility constraints and recruitment difficulties encountered. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TILT was registered prospectively on the European Clinical Trials Registry (EudraCT number 2016-004727-23) and the ISRCTN Register (10432197) on 04 December 2017. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-022-01156-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9440504 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94405042022-09-04 A trial of intra-pleural bacterial immunotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma (TILT) — a randomised feasibility study using the trial within a cohort (TwiC) methodology Bibby, Anna C. Zahan-Evans, Natalie Keenan, Emma Comins, Charles Harvey, John E. Day, Helen Rahman, Najib M. Fallon, Janet E. Gooberman-Hill, Rachael Maskell, Nick A. Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive thoracic malignancy with a poor prognosis. Systemic immunotherapy is an effective frontline treatment for MPM, and there is a scientific rationale supporting the possible efficacy of local, i.e. intra-pleural immune modulators. Trial of intra-pleural bacterial immunotherapy (TILT) investigated the feasibility of performing a randomised trial of intra-pleural bacterial immunotherapy in people with MPM, using the trials within cohorts (TwiC) methodology. METHODS: TILT was a multicentre, three-armed, randomised, feasibility TwiC of intra-pleural OK432, BCG, or usual care in people with MPM. Eligible participants were identified from within the ASSESS-meso study, a prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study, and were randomly selected to be offered a single dose of OK432 or BCG, via an indwelling pleural catheter. The primary outcome was feasibility, evaluated against prespecified recruitment, attrition and data completeness targets. The acceptability of trial processes and interventions was assessed during qualitative interviews with participants and family members at the end of the trial. TILT was registered prospectively on the European Clinical Trials Registry (EudraCT number 2016–004,727-23) and the ISRCTN Register on 04 December 2017. RESULTS: Seven participants were randomised from a planned sample size of 12; thus, the 66% recruitment rate target was not met. Two participants withdrew after randomisation, breaching the pre-stated attrition threshold of 10%. It was not possible to maintain blinding of control participants, which negated a fundamental tenet of the TwiC design. The trial processes and methodology were generally acceptable to participants and relatives, despite several recipients of intra-pleural bacterial agents experiencing significant local and systemic inflammatory responses. CONCLUSION: It was possible to design a clinical trial of an investigational medicinal product based on the TwiC design and to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals. However, whilst acceptable to participants and relatives, the TwiC design was not a feasible method of investigating intra-pleural bacterial immunotherapy in people with MPM. Future trials investigating this topic should consider the eligibility constraints and recruitment difficulties encountered. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TILT was registered prospectively on the European Clinical Trials Registry (EudraCT number 2016-004727-23) and the ISRCTN Register (10432197) on 04 December 2017. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-022-01156-3. BioMed Central 2022-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9440504/ /pubmed/36057634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01156-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Bibby, Anna C. Zahan-Evans, Natalie Keenan, Emma Comins, Charles Harvey, John E. Day, Helen Rahman, Najib M. Fallon, Janet E. Gooberman-Hill, Rachael Maskell, Nick A. A trial of intra-pleural bacterial immunotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma (TILT) — a randomised feasibility study using the trial within a cohort (TwiC) methodology |
title | A trial of intra-pleural bacterial immunotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma (TILT) — a randomised feasibility study using the trial within a cohort (TwiC) methodology |
title_full | A trial of intra-pleural bacterial immunotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma (TILT) — a randomised feasibility study using the trial within a cohort (TwiC) methodology |
title_fullStr | A trial of intra-pleural bacterial immunotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma (TILT) — a randomised feasibility study using the trial within a cohort (TwiC) methodology |
title_full_unstemmed | A trial of intra-pleural bacterial immunotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma (TILT) — a randomised feasibility study using the trial within a cohort (TwiC) methodology |
title_short | A trial of intra-pleural bacterial immunotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma (TILT) — a randomised feasibility study using the trial within a cohort (TwiC) methodology |
title_sort | trial of intra-pleural bacterial immunotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma (tilt) — a randomised feasibility study using the trial within a cohort (twic) methodology |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9440504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36057634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01156-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bibbyannac atrialofintrapleuralbacterialimmunotherapyinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomatiltarandomisedfeasibilitystudyusingthetrialwithinacohorttwicmethodology AT zahanevansnatalie atrialofintrapleuralbacterialimmunotherapyinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomatiltarandomisedfeasibilitystudyusingthetrialwithinacohorttwicmethodology AT keenanemma atrialofintrapleuralbacterialimmunotherapyinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomatiltarandomisedfeasibilitystudyusingthetrialwithinacohorttwicmethodology AT cominscharles atrialofintrapleuralbacterialimmunotherapyinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomatiltarandomisedfeasibilitystudyusingthetrialwithinacohorttwicmethodology AT harveyjohne atrialofintrapleuralbacterialimmunotherapyinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomatiltarandomisedfeasibilitystudyusingthetrialwithinacohorttwicmethodology AT dayhelen atrialofintrapleuralbacterialimmunotherapyinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomatiltarandomisedfeasibilitystudyusingthetrialwithinacohorttwicmethodology AT rahmannajibm atrialofintrapleuralbacterialimmunotherapyinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomatiltarandomisedfeasibilitystudyusingthetrialwithinacohorttwicmethodology AT fallonjanete atrialofintrapleuralbacterialimmunotherapyinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomatiltarandomisedfeasibilitystudyusingthetrialwithinacohorttwicmethodology AT goobermanhillrachael atrialofintrapleuralbacterialimmunotherapyinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomatiltarandomisedfeasibilitystudyusingthetrialwithinacohorttwicmethodology AT maskellnicka atrialofintrapleuralbacterialimmunotherapyinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomatiltarandomisedfeasibilitystudyusingthetrialwithinacohorttwicmethodology AT bibbyannac trialofintrapleuralbacterialimmunotherapyinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomatiltarandomisedfeasibilitystudyusingthetrialwithinacohorttwicmethodology AT zahanevansnatalie trialofintrapleuralbacterialimmunotherapyinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomatiltarandomisedfeasibilitystudyusingthetrialwithinacohorttwicmethodology AT keenanemma trialofintrapleuralbacterialimmunotherapyinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomatiltarandomisedfeasibilitystudyusingthetrialwithinacohorttwicmethodology AT cominscharles trialofintrapleuralbacterialimmunotherapyinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomatiltarandomisedfeasibilitystudyusingthetrialwithinacohorttwicmethodology AT harveyjohne trialofintrapleuralbacterialimmunotherapyinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomatiltarandomisedfeasibilitystudyusingthetrialwithinacohorttwicmethodology AT dayhelen trialofintrapleuralbacterialimmunotherapyinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomatiltarandomisedfeasibilitystudyusingthetrialwithinacohorttwicmethodology AT rahmannajibm trialofintrapleuralbacterialimmunotherapyinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomatiltarandomisedfeasibilitystudyusingthetrialwithinacohorttwicmethodology AT fallonjanete trialofintrapleuralbacterialimmunotherapyinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomatiltarandomisedfeasibilitystudyusingthetrialwithinacohorttwicmethodology AT goobermanhillrachael trialofintrapleuralbacterialimmunotherapyinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomatiltarandomisedfeasibilitystudyusingthetrialwithinacohorttwicmethodology AT maskellnicka trialofintrapleuralbacterialimmunotherapyinmalignantpleuralmesotheliomatiltarandomisedfeasibilitystudyusingthetrialwithinacohorttwicmethodology |