Cargando…
The CT delta-radiomics based machine learning approach in evaluating multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma
OBJECT: To evaluate the difference between multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma (MPLA) and solitary primary lung adenocarcinoma (SPLA) by delta-radiomics based machine learning algorithms in CT images. METHODS: A total of 1094 patients containing 268 MPLAs and 826 SPLAs were recruited for this retro...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9440600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36057553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10036-1 |
_version_ | 1784782386594054144 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Yanqing Li, Jie Xu, Xiren Zhang, Yang Lin, Yi |
author_facet | Ma, Yanqing Li, Jie Xu, Xiren Zhang, Yang Lin, Yi |
author_sort | Ma, Yanqing |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECT: To evaluate the difference between multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma (MPLA) and solitary primary lung adenocarcinoma (SPLA) by delta-radiomics based machine learning algorithms in CT images. METHODS: A total of 1094 patients containing 268 MPLAs and 826 SPLAs were recruited for this retrospective study between 2014 to 2020. After the segmentation of volume of interest, the radiomic features were automatically calculated. The patients were categorized into the training set and testing set by a random proportion of 7:3. After feature selection, the relevant classifiers were constructed by the machine learning algorithms of Bayes, forest, k-nearest neighbor, logistic regression, support vector machine, and decision tree. The relative standard deviation (RSD) was calculated and the classification model with minimal RSD was chosen for delta-radiomics analysis to explore the variation of tumor during follow-up surveillance in the cohort of 225 MPLAs and 320 SPLAs. According to the different follow-up duration, it was divided into group A (3–12 months), group B (13–24 months), and group C (25–48 months). Then the corresponding delta-radiomics classifiers were developed to predict MPLAs. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was quantified to evaluate the efficiency of the model. RESULTS: To radiomics analysis, the forest classifier (FC-radio) with the minimal RSD showed the better stability with AUCs of 0.840 (95%CI, 0.810–0.867) and 0.670 (95%CI, 0.611–0.724) in the training and testing set. The AUCs of the forest classifier based on delta-radiomics (FC-delta) were higher than those of FC-radio. In addition, with the extension of follow-up duration, the performance of FC-delta in Group C were the best with AUCs of 0.998 (95%CI, 0.993–1.000) in the training set and 0.853 (95%CI, 0.752–0.940) in the testing set. CONCLUSIONS: The machine-learning approach based on radiomics and delta-radiomics helped to differentiate SPLAs from MPLAs. The FC-delta with a longer follow-up duration could better distinguish between SPLAs and MPLAs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10036-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9440600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94406002022-09-04 The CT delta-radiomics based machine learning approach in evaluating multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma Ma, Yanqing Li, Jie Xu, Xiren Zhang, Yang Lin, Yi BMC Cancer Research OBJECT: To evaluate the difference between multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma (MPLA) and solitary primary lung adenocarcinoma (SPLA) by delta-radiomics based machine learning algorithms in CT images. METHODS: A total of 1094 patients containing 268 MPLAs and 826 SPLAs were recruited for this retrospective study between 2014 to 2020. After the segmentation of volume of interest, the radiomic features were automatically calculated. The patients were categorized into the training set and testing set by a random proportion of 7:3. After feature selection, the relevant classifiers were constructed by the machine learning algorithms of Bayes, forest, k-nearest neighbor, logistic regression, support vector machine, and decision tree. The relative standard deviation (RSD) was calculated and the classification model with minimal RSD was chosen for delta-radiomics analysis to explore the variation of tumor during follow-up surveillance in the cohort of 225 MPLAs and 320 SPLAs. According to the different follow-up duration, it was divided into group A (3–12 months), group B (13–24 months), and group C (25–48 months). Then the corresponding delta-radiomics classifiers were developed to predict MPLAs. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was quantified to evaluate the efficiency of the model. RESULTS: To radiomics analysis, the forest classifier (FC-radio) with the minimal RSD showed the better stability with AUCs of 0.840 (95%CI, 0.810–0.867) and 0.670 (95%CI, 0.611–0.724) in the training and testing set. The AUCs of the forest classifier based on delta-radiomics (FC-delta) were higher than those of FC-radio. In addition, with the extension of follow-up duration, the performance of FC-delta in Group C were the best with AUCs of 0.998 (95%CI, 0.993–1.000) in the training set and 0.853 (95%CI, 0.752–0.940) in the testing set. CONCLUSIONS: The machine-learning approach based on radiomics and delta-radiomics helped to differentiate SPLAs from MPLAs. The FC-delta with a longer follow-up duration could better distinguish between SPLAs and MPLAs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10036-1. BioMed Central 2022-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9440600/ /pubmed/36057553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10036-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ma, Yanqing Li, Jie Xu, Xiren Zhang, Yang Lin, Yi The CT delta-radiomics based machine learning approach in evaluating multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma |
title | The CT delta-radiomics based machine learning approach in evaluating multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma |
title_full | The CT delta-radiomics based machine learning approach in evaluating multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma |
title_fullStr | The CT delta-radiomics based machine learning approach in evaluating multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | The CT delta-radiomics based machine learning approach in evaluating multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma |
title_short | The CT delta-radiomics based machine learning approach in evaluating multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma |
title_sort | ct delta-radiomics based machine learning approach in evaluating multiple primary lung adenocarcinoma |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9440600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36057553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-10036-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mayanqing thectdeltaradiomicsbasedmachinelearningapproachinevaluatingmultipleprimarylungadenocarcinoma AT lijie thectdeltaradiomicsbasedmachinelearningapproachinevaluatingmultipleprimarylungadenocarcinoma AT xuxiren thectdeltaradiomicsbasedmachinelearningapproachinevaluatingmultipleprimarylungadenocarcinoma AT zhangyang thectdeltaradiomicsbasedmachinelearningapproachinevaluatingmultipleprimarylungadenocarcinoma AT linyi thectdeltaradiomicsbasedmachinelearningapproachinevaluatingmultipleprimarylungadenocarcinoma AT mayanqing ctdeltaradiomicsbasedmachinelearningapproachinevaluatingmultipleprimarylungadenocarcinoma AT lijie ctdeltaradiomicsbasedmachinelearningapproachinevaluatingmultipleprimarylungadenocarcinoma AT xuxiren ctdeltaradiomicsbasedmachinelearningapproachinevaluatingmultipleprimarylungadenocarcinoma AT zhangyang ctdeltaradiomicsbasedmachinelearningapproachinevaluatingmultipleprimarylungadenocarcinoma AT linyi ctdeltaradiomicsbasedmachinelearningapproachinevaluatingmultipleprimarylungadenocarcinoma |