Cargando…
Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project
BACKGROUND: A Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis was performed to understand the status quo of education and training in radiation protection (RP) and to develop a coordinated European approach to RP training needs based on stakeholder consensus and existing activities in the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9440860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36057698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01271-y |
_version_ | 1784782450243665920 |
---|---|
author | Rainford, Louise Santos, Joana Alves, Francisco Figueiredo, João Paulo Hoeschen, Christoph Damilakis, John Frija, Guy Andersson, Jonas McNulty, Jonathan Foley, Shane Bacher, Klaus Nestle, Ursula Hierath, Monika Paulo, Graciano |
author_facet | Rainford, Louise Santos, Joana Alves, Francisco Figueiredo, João Paulo Hoeschen, Christoph Damilakis, John Frija, Guy Andersson, Jonas McNulty, Jonathan Foley, Shane Bacher, Klaus Nestle, Ursula Hierath, Monika Paulo, Graciano |
author_sort | Rainford, Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis was performed to understand the status quo of education and training in radiation protection (RP) and to develop a coordinated European approach to RP training needs based on stakeholder consensus and existing activities in the field. Fourteen team members represented six European professional societies, one European voluntary organisation, two international healthcare organisations and five professions, namely: Medical Physicists; Nuclear Medicine Physicians; Radiologists; Radiation Oncologists and Radiographers. Four subgroups analysed the “Strengths”, “Weaknesses”, “Opportunities” and “Threats” related to E&T in RP developed under previous European Union (EU) programmes and on the Guidelines on Radiation Protection Education and Training of Medical Professionals in the EU. RESULTS: Consensus agreement identified four themes for strengths and opportunities, namely: (1) existing structures and training recommendations; (2) RP training needs assessment and education & training (E&T) model(s) development; (3) E&T dissemination, harmonisation, and accreditation; (4) financial supports. Weaknesses and Threats analysis identified two themes: (1) awareness and prioritisation at a national/global level and (2) awareness and prioritisation by healthcare professional groups and researchers. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of effective implementation of RP principles in daily practice was identified. EuRnR strategic planning needs to consider processes at European, national and local levels. Success is dependent upon efficient governance structures and expert leadership. Financial support is required to allow the stakeholder professional agencies to have sufficient resources to achieve a pan European radiation protection training network which is sustainable and accredited across multiple national domains. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9440860 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94408602022-09-05 Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project Rainford, Louise Santos, Joana Alves, Francisco Figueiredo, João Paulo Hoeschen, Christoph Damilakis, John Frija, Guy Andersson, Jonas McNulty, Jonathan Foley, Shane Bacher, Klaus Nestle, Ursula Hierath, Monika Paulo, Graciano Insights Imaging Original Article BACKGROUND: A Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis was performed to understand the status quo of education and training in radiation protection (RP) and to develop a coordinated European approach to RP training needs based on stakeholder consensus and existing activities in the field. Fourteen team members represented six European professional societies, one European voluntary organisation, two international healthcare organisations and five professions, namely: Medical Physicists; Nuclear Medicine Physicians; Radiologists; Radiation Oncologists and Radiographers. Four subgroups analysed the “Strengths”, “Weaknesses”, “Opportunities” and “Threats” related to E&T in RP developed under previous European Union (EU) programmes and on the Guidelines on Radiation Protection Education and Training of Medical Professionals in the EU. RESULTS: Consensus agreement identified four themes for strengths and opportunities, namely: (1) existing structures and training recommendations; (2) RP training needs assessment and education & training (E&T) model(s) development; (3) E&T dissemination, harmonisation, and accreditation; (4) financial supports. Weaknesses and Threats analysis identified two themes: (1) awareness and prioritisation at a national/global level and (2) awareness and prioritisation by healthcare professional groups and researchers. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of effective implementation of RP principles in daily practice was identified. EuRnR strategic planning needs to consider processes at European, national and local levels. Success is dependent upon efficient governance structures and expert leadership. Financial support is required to allow the stakeholder professional agencies to have sufficient resources to achieve a pan European radiation protection training network which is sustainable and accredited across multiple national domains. Springer Vienna 2022-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9440860/ /pubmed/36057698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01271-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rainford, Louise Santos, Joana Alves, Francisco Figueiredo, João Paulo Hoeschen, Christoph Damilakis, John Frija, Guy Andersson, Jonas McNulty, Jonathan Foley, Shane Bacher, Klaus Nestle, Ursula Hierath, Monika Paulo, Graciano Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project |
title | Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project |
title_full | Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project |
title_fullStr | Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project |
title_full_unstemmed | Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project |
title_short | Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project |
title_sort | education and training in radiation protection in europe: an analysis from the euramed rocc-n-roll project |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9440860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36057698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01271-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rainfordlouise educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject AT santosjoana educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject AT alvesfrancisco educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject AT figueiredojoaopaulo educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject AT hoeschenchristoph educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject AT damilakisjohn educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject AT frijaguy educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject AT anderssonjonas educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject AT mcnultyjonathan educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject AT foleyshane educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject AT bacherklaus educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject AT nestleursula educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject AT hierathmonika educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject AT paulograciano educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject |