Cargando…

Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project

BACKGROUND: A Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis was performed to understand the status quo of education and training in radiation protection (RP) and to develop a coordinated European approach to RP training needs based on stakeholder consensus and existing activities in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rainford, Louise, Santos, Joana, Alves, Francisco, Figueiredo, João Paulo, Hoeschen, Christoph, Damilakis, John, Frija, Guy, Andersson, Jonas, McNulty, Jonathan, Foley, Shane, Bacher, Klaus, Nestle, Ursula, Hierath, Monika, Paulo, Graciano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9440860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36057698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01271-y
_version_ 1784782450243665920
author Rainford, Louise
Santos, Joana
Alves, Francisco
Figueiredo, João Paulo
Hoeschen, Christoph
Damilakis, John
Frija, Guy
Andersson, Jonas
McNulty, Jonathan
Foley, Shane
Bacher, Klaus
Nestle, Ursula
Hierath, Monika
Paulo, Graciano
author_facet Rainford, Louise
Santos, Joana
Alves, Francisco
Figueiredo, João Paulo
Hoeschen, Christoph
Damilakis, John
Frija, Guy
Andersson, Jonas
McNulty, Jonathan
Foley, Shane
Bacher, Klaus
Nestle, Ursula
Hierath, Monika
Paulo, Graciano
author_sort Rainford, Louise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis was performed to understand the status quo of education and training in radiation protection (RP) and to develop a coordinated European approach to RP training needs based on stakeholder consensus and existing activities in the field. Fourteen team members represented six European professional societies, one European voluntary organisation, two international healthcare organisations and five professions, namely: Medical Physicists; Nuclear Medicine Physicians; Radiologists; Radiation Oncologists and Radiographers. Four subgroups analysed the “Strengths”, “Weaknesses”, “Opportunities” and “Threats” related to E&T in RP developed under previous European Union (EU) programmes and on the Guidelines on Radiation Protection Education and Training of Medical Professionals in the EU. RESULTS: Consensus agreement identified four themes for strengths and opportunities, namely: (1) existing structures and training recommendations; (2) RP training needs assessment and education & training (E&T) model(s) development; (3) E&T dissemination, harmonisation, and accreditation; (4) financial supports. Weaknesses and Threats analysis identified two themes: (1) awareness and prioritisation at a national/global level and (2) awareness and prioritisation by healthcare professional groups and researchers. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of effective implementation of RP principles in daily practice was identified. EuRnR strategic planning needs to consider processes at European, national and local levels. Success is dependent upon efficient governance structures and expert leadership. Financial support is required to allow the stakeholder professional agencies to have sufficient resources to achieve a pan European radiation protection training network which is sustainable and accredited across multiple national domains.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9440860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94408602022-09-05 Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project Rainford, Louise Santos, Joana Alves, Francisco Figueiredo, João Paulo Hoeschen, Christoph Damilakis, John Frija, Guy Andersson, Jonas McNulty, Jonathan Foley, Shane Bacher, Klaus Nestle, Ursula Hierath, Monika Paulo, Graciano Insights Imaging Original Article BACKGROUND: A Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis was performed to understand the status quo of education and training in radiation protection (RP) and to develop a coordinated European approach to RP training needs based on stakeholder consensus and existing activities in the field. Fourteen team members represented six European professional societies, one European voluntary organisation, two international healthcare organisations and five professions, namely: Medical Physicists; Nuclear Medicine Physicians; Radiologists; Radiation Oncologists and Radiographers. Four subgroups analysed the “Strengths”, “Weaknesses”, “Opportunities” and “Threats” related to E&T in RP developed under previous European Union (EU) programmes and on the Guidelines on Radiation Protection Education and Training of Medical Professionals in the EU. RESULTS: Consensus agreement identified four themes for strengths and opportunities, namely: (1) existing structures and training recommendations; (2) RP training needs assessment and education & training (E&T) model(s) development; (3) E&T dissemination, harmonisation, and accreditation; (4) financial supports. Weaknesses and Threats analysis identified two themes: (1) awareness and prioritisation at a national/global level and (2) awareness and prioritisation by healthcare professional groups and researchers. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of effective implementation of RP principles in daily practice was identified. EuRnR strategic planning needs to consider processes at European, national and local levels. Success is dependent upon efficient governance structures and expert leadership. Financial support is required to allow the stakeholder professional agencies to have sufficient resources to achieve a pan European radiation protection training network which is sustainable and accredited across multiple national domains. Springer Vienna 2022-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9440860/ /pubmed/36057698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01271-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Rainford, Louise
Santos, Joana
Alves, Francisco
Figueiredo, João Paulo
Hoeschen, Christoph
Damilakis, John
Frija, Guy
Andersson, Jonas
McNulty, Jonathan
Foley, Shane
Bacher, Klaus
Nestle, Ursula
Hierath, Monika
Paulo, Graciano
Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project
title Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project
title_full Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project
title_fullStr Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project
title_full_unstemmed Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project
title_short Education and training in radiation protection in Europe: an analysis from the EURAMED rocc-n-roll project
title_sort education and training in radiation protection in europe: an analysis from the euramed rocc-n-roll project
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9440860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36057698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01271-y
work_keys_str_mv AT rainfordlouise educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject
AT santosjoana educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject
AT alvesfrancisco educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject
AT figueiredojoaopaulo educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject
AT hoeschenchristoph educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject
AT damilakisjohn educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject
AT frijaguy educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject
AT anderssonjonas educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject
AT mcnultyjonathan educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject
AT foleyshane educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject
AT bacherklaus educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject
AT nestleursula educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject
AT hierathmonika educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject
AT paulograciano educationandtraininginradiationprotectionineuropeananalysisfromtheeuramedroccnrollproject