Cargando…

Performance of a deep learning tool to detect missed aortic dilatation in a large chest CT cohort

PURPOSE: Thoracic aortic (TA) dilatation (TAD) is a risk factor for acute aortic syndrome and must therefore be reported in every CT report. However, the complex anatomy of the thoracic aorta impedes TAD detection. We investigated the performance of a deep learning (DL) prototype as a secondary read...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pradella, Maurice, Achermann, Rita, Sperl, Jonathan I., Kärgel, Rainer, Rapaka, Saikiran, Cyriac, Joshy, Yang, Shan, Sommer, Gregor, Stieltjes, Bram, Bremerich, Jens, Brantner, Philipp, Sauter, Alexander W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36072871
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.972512
_version_ 1784782613809987584
author Pradella, Maurice
Achermann, Rita
Sperl, Jonathan I.
Kärgel, Rainer
Rapaka, Saikiran
Cyriac, Joshy
Yang, Shan
Sommer, Gregor
Stieltjes, Bram
Bremerich, Jens
Brantner, Philipp
Sauter, Alexander W.
author_facet Pradella, Maurice
Achermann, Rita
Sperl, Jonathan I.
Kärgel, Rainer
Rapaka, Saikiran
Cyriac, Joshy
Yang, Shan
Sommer, Gregor
Stieltjes, Bram
Bremerich, Jens
Brantner, Philipp
Sauter, Alexander W.
author_sort Pradella, Maurice
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Thoracic aortic (TA) dilatation (TAD) is a risk factor for acute aortic syndrome and must therefore be reported in every CT report. However, the complex anatomy of the thoracic aorta impedes TAD detection. We investigated the performance of a deep learning (DL) prototype as a secondary reading tool built to measure TA diameters in a large-scale cohort. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive contrast-enhanced (CE) and non-CE chest CT exams with “normal” TA diameters according to their radiology reports were included. The DL-prototype (AIRad, Siemens Healthineers, Germany) measured the TA at nine locations according to AHA guidelines. Dilatation was defined as >45 mm at aortic sinus, sinotubular junction (STJ), ascending aorta (AA) and proximal arch and >40 mm from mid arch to abdominal aorta. A cardiovascular radiologist reviewed all cases with TAD according to AIRad. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) was used to identify factors (demographics and scan parameters) associated with TAD classification by AIRad. RESULTS: 18,243 CT scans (45.7% female) were successfully analyzed by AIRad. Mean age was 62.3 ± 15.9 years and 12,092 (66.3%) were CE scans. AIRad confirmed normal diameters in 17,239 exams (94.5%) and reported TAD in 1,004/18,243 exams (5.5%). Review confirmed TAD classification in 452/1,004 exams (45.0%, 2.5% total), 552 cases were false-positive but identification was easily possible using visual outputs by AIRad. MLR revealed that the following factors were significantly associated with correct TAD classification by AIRad: TAD reported at AA [odds ratio (OR): 1.12, p < 0.001] and STJ (OR: 1.09, p = 0.002), TAD found at >1 location (OR: 1.42, p = 0.008), in CE exams (OR: 2.1–3.1, p < 0.05), men (OR: 2.4, p = 0.003) and patients presenting with higher BMI (OR: 1.05, p = 0.01). Overall, 17,691/18,243 (97.0%) exams were correctly classified. CONCLUSIONS: AIRad correctly assessed the presence or absence of TAD in 17,691 exams (97%), including 452 cases with previously missed TAD independent from contrast protocol. These findings suggest its usefulness as a secondary reading tool by improving report quality and efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9441594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94415942022-09-06 Performance of a deep learning tool to detect missed aortic dilatation in a large chest CT cohort Pradella, Maurice Achermann, Rita Sperl, Jonathan I. Kärgel, Rainer Rapaka, Saikiran Cyriac, Joshy Yang, Shan Sommer, Gregor Stieltjes, Bram Bremerich, Jens Brantner, Philipp Sauter, Alexander W. Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine PURPOSE: Thoracic aortic (TA) dilatation (TAD) is a risk factor for acute aortic syndrome and must therefore be reported in every CT report. However, the complex anatomy of the thoracic aorta impedes TAD detection. We investigated the performance of a deep learning (DL) prototype as a secondary reading tool built to measure TA diameters in a large-scale cohort. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive contrast-enhanced (CE) and non-CE chest CT exams with “normal” TA diameters according to their radiology reports were included. The DL-prototype (AIRad, Siemens Healthineers, Germany) measured the TA at nine locations according to AHA guidelines. Dilatation was defined as >45 mm at aortic sinus, sinotubular junction (STJ), ascending aorta (AA) and proximal arch and >40 mm from mid arch to abdominal aorta. A cardiovascular radiologist reviewed all cases with TAD according to AIRad. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) was used to identify factors (demographics and scan parameters) associated with TAD classification by AIRad. RESULTS: 18,243 CT scans (45.7% female) were successfully analyzed by AIRad. Mean age was 62.3 ± 15.9 years and 12,092 (66.3%) were CE scans. AIRad confirmed normal diameters in 17,239 exams (94.5%) and reported TAD in 1,004/18,243 exams (5.5%). Review confirmed TAD classification in 452/1,004 exams (45.0%, 2.5% total), 552 cases were false-positive but identification was easily possible using visual outputs by AIRad. MLR revealed that the following factors were significantly associated with correct TAD classification by AIRad: TAD reported at AA [odds ratio (OR): 1.12, p < 0.001] and STJ (OR: 1.09, p = 0.002), TAD found at >1 location (OR: 1.42, p = 0.008), in CE exams (OR: 2.1–3.1, p < 0.05), men (OR: 2.4, p = 0.003) and patients presenting with higher BMI (OR: 1.05, p = 0.01). Overall, 17,691/18,243 (97.0%) exams were correctly classified. CONCLUSIONS: AIRad correctly assessed the presence or absence of TAD in 17,691 exams (97%), including 452 cases with previously missed TAD independent from contrast protocol. These findings suggest its usefulness as a secondary reading tool by improving report quality and efficiency. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9441594/ /pubmed/36072871 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.972512 Text en Copyright © 2022 Pradella, Achermann, Sperl, Kärgel, Rapaka, Cyriac, Yang, Sommer, Stieltjes, Bremerich, Brantner and Sauter. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Pradella, Maurice
Achermann, Rita
Sperl, Jonathan I.
Kärgel, Rainer
Rapaka, Saikiran
Cyriac, Joshy
Yang, Shan
Sommer, Gregor
Stieltjes, Bram
Bremerich, Jens
Brantner, Philipp
Sauter, Alexander W.
Performance of a deep learning tool to detect missed aortic dilatation in a large chest CT cohort
title Performance of a deep learning tool to detect missed aortic dilatation in a large chest CT cohort
title_full Performance of a deep learning tool to detect missed aortic dilatation in a large chest CT cohort
title_fullStr Performance of a deep learning tool to detect missed aortic dilatation in a large chest CT cohort
title_full_unstemmed Performance of a deep learning tool to detect missed aortic dilatation in a large chest CT cohort
title_short Performance of a deep learning tool to detect missed aortic dilatation in a large chest CT cohort
title_sort performance of a deep learning tool to detect missed aortic dilatation in a large chest ct cohort
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36072871
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.972512
work_keys_str_mv AT pradellamaurice performanceofadeeplearningtooltodetectmissedaorticdilatationinalargechestctcohort
AT achermannrita performanceofadeeplearningtooltodetectmissedaorticdilatationinalargechestctcohort
AT sperljonathani performanceofadeeplearningtooltodetectmissedaorticdilatationinalargechestctcohort
AT kargelrainer performanceofadeeplearningtooltodetectmissedaorticdilatationinalargechestctcohort
AT rapakasaikiran performanceofadeeplearningtooltodetectmissedaorticdilatationinalargechestctcohort
AT cyriacjoshy performanceofadeeplearningtooltodetectmissedaorticdilatationinalargechestctcohort
AT yangshan performanceofadeeplearningtooltodetectmissedaorticdilatationinalargechestctcohort
AT sommergregor performanceofadeeplearningtooltodetectmissedaorticdilatationinalargechestctcohort
AT stieltjesbram performanceofadeeplearningtooltodetectmissedaorticdilatationinalargechestctcohort
AT bremerichjens performanceofadeeplearningtooltodetectmissedaorticdilatationinalargechestctcohort
AT brantnerphilipp performanceofadeeplearningtooltodetectmissedaorticdilatationinalargechestctcohort
AT sauteralexanderw performanceofadeeplearningtooltodetectmissedaorticdilatationinalargechestctcohort