Cargando…

Brainstem evoked auditory potentials in tinnitus: A best-evidence synthesis and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Accumulating evidence suggests a role of the brainstem in tinnitus generation and modulation. Several studies in chronic tinnitus patients have reported latency and amplitude changes of the different peaks of the auditory brainstem response, possibly reflecting neural changes or altere...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacxsens, Laura, De Pauw, Joke, Cardon, Emilie, van der Wal, Annemarie, Jacquemin, Laure, Gilles, Annick, Michiels, Sarah, Van Rompaey, Vincent, Lammers, Marc J. W., De Hertogh, Willem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36071905
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.941876
_version_ 1784782617834422272
author Jacxsens, Laura
De Pauw, Joke
Cardon, Emilie
van der Wal, Annemarie
Jacquemin, Laure
Gilles, Annick
Michiels, Sarah
Van Rompaey, Vincent
Lammers, Marc J. W.
De Hertogh, Willem
author_facet Jacxsens, Laura
De Pauw, Joke
Cardon, Emilie
van der Wal, Annemarie
Jacquemin, Laure
Gilles, Annick
Michiels, Sarah
Van Rompaey, Vincent
Lammers, Marc J. W.
De Hertogh, Willem
author_sort Jacxsens, Laura
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Accumulating evidence suggests a role of the brainstem in tinnitus generation and modulation. Several studies in chronic tinnitus patients have reported latency and amplitude changes of the different peaks of the auditory brainstem response, possibly reflecting neural changes or altered activity. The aim of the systematic review was to assess if alterations within the brainstem of chronic tinnitus patients are reflected in short- and middle-latency auditory evoked potentials (AEPs). METHODS: A systematic review was performed and reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating short- and middle-latency AEPs in tinnitus patients and controls were included. Two independent reviewers conducted the study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Meta-analysis was performed using a multivariate meta-analytic model. RESULTS: Twenty-seven cross-sectional studies were included. Multivariate meta-analysis revealed that in tinnitus patients with normal hearing, significantly longer latencies of auditory brainstem response (ABR) waves I (SMD = 0.66 ms, p < 0.001), III (SMD = 0.43 ms, p < 0.001), and V (SMD = 0.47 ms, p < 0.01) are present. The results regarding possible changes in middle-latency responses (MLRs) and frequency-following responses (FFRs) were inconclusive. DISCUSSION: The discovered changes in short-latency AEPs reflect alterations at brainstem level in tinnitus patients. More specifically, the prolonged ABR latencies could possibly be explained by high frequency sensorineural hearing loss, or other modulating factors such as cochlear synaptopathy or somatosensory tinnitus generators. The question whether middle-latency AEP changes, representing subcortical level of the auditory pathway, are present in tinnitus still remains unanswered. Future studies should identify and correctly deal with confounding factors, such as age, gender and the presence of somatosensory tinnitus components. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021243687, PROSPERO [CRD42021243687].
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9441610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94416102022-09-06 Brainstem evoked auditory potentials in tinnitus: A best-evidence synthesis and meta-analysis Jacxsens, Laura De Pauw, Joke Cardon, Emilie van der Wal, Annemarie Jacquemin, Laure Gilles, Annick Michiels, Sarah Van Rompaey, Vincent Lammers, Marc J. W. De Hertogh, Willem Front Neurol Neurology INTRODUCTION: Accumulating evidence suggests a role of the brainstem in tinnitus generation and modulation. Several studies in chronic tinnitus patients have reported latency and amplitude changes of the different peaks of the auditory brainstem response, possibly reflecting neural changes or altered activity. The aim of the systematic review was to assess if alterations within the brainstem of chronic tinnitus patients are reflected in short- and middle-latency auditory evoked potentials (AEPs). METHODS: A systematic review was performed and reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating short- and middle-latency AEPs in tinnitus patients and controls were included. Two independent reviewers conducted the study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Meta-analysis was performed using a multivariate meta-analytic model. RESULTS: Twenty-seven cross-sectional studies were included. Multivariate meta-analysis revealed that in tinnitus patients with normal hearing, significantly longer latencies of auditory brainstem response (ABR) waves I (SMD = 0.66 ms, p < 0.001), III (SMD = 0.43 ms, p < 0.001), and V (SMD = 0.47 ms, p < 0.01) are present. The results regarding possible changes in middle-latency responses (MLRs) and frequency-following responses (FFRs) were inconclusive. DISCUSSION: The discovered changes in short-latency AEPs reflect alterations at brainstem level in tinnitus patients. More specifically, the prolonged ABR latencies could possibly be explained by high frequency sensorineural hearing loss, or other modulating factors such as cochlear synaptopathy or somatosensory tinnitus generators. The question whether middle-latency AEP changes, representing subcortical level of the auditory pathway, are present in tinnitus still remains unanswered. Future studies should identify and correctly deal with confounding factors, such as age, gender and the presence of somatosensory tinnitus components. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021243687, PROSPERO [CRD42021243687]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9441610/ /pubmed/36071905 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.941876 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jacxsens, De Pauw, Cardon, van der Wal, Jacquemin, Gilles, Michiels, Van Rompaey, Lammers and De Hertogh. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Jacxsens, Laura
De Pauw, Joke
Cardon, Emilie
van der Wal, Annemarie
Jacquemin, Laure
Gilles, Annick
Michiels, Sarah
Van Rompaey, Vincent
Lammers, Marc J. W.
De Hertogh, Willem
Brainstem evoked auditory potentials in tinnitus: A best-evidence synthesis and meta-analysis
title Brainstem evoked auditory potentials in tinnitus: A best-evidence synthesis and meta-analysis
title_full Brainstem evoked auditory potentials in tinnitus: A best-evidence synthesis and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Brainstem evoked auditory potentials in tinnitus: A best-evidence synthesis and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Brainstem evoked auditory potentials in tinnitus: A best-evidence synthesis and meta-analysis
title_short Brainstem evoked auditory potentials in tinnitus: A best-evidence synthesis and meta-analysis
title_sort brainstem evoked auditory potentials in tinnitus: a best-evidence synthesis and meta-analysis
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36071905
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.941876
work_keys_str_mv AT jacxsenslaura brainstemevokedauditorypotentialsintinnitusabestevidencesynthesisandmetaanalysis
AT depauwjoke brainstemevokedauditorypotentialsintinnitusabestevidencesynthesisandmetaanalysis
AT cardonemilie brainstemevokedauditorypotentialsintinnitusabestevidencesynthesisandmetaanalysis
AT vanderwalannemarie brainstemevokedauditorypotentialsintinnitusabestevidencesynthesisandmetaanalysis
AT jacqueminlaure brainstemevokedauditorypotentialsintinnitusabestevidencesynthesisandmetaanalysis
AT gillesannick brainstemevokedauditorypotentialsintinnitusabestevidencesynthesisandmetaanalysis
AT michielssarah brainstemevokedauditorypotentialsintinnitusabestevidencesynthesisandmetaanalysis
AT vanrompaeyvincent brainstemevokedauditorypotentialsintinnitusabestevidencesynthesisandmetaanalysis
AT lammersmarcjw brainstemevokedauditorypotentialsintinnitusabestevidencesynthesisandmetaanalysis
AT dehertoghwillem brainstemevokedauditorypotentialsintinnitusabestevidencesynthesisandmetaanalysis