Cargando…

Evaluation of Brazilian web site information on allergic rhinitis

Nowadays, the World Wide Web (Internet) is an information source for non-experts and physicians. Aim: To evaluate, based on ethical principles, Brazilian web sites information about “allergic rhinitis”. Allergic rhinitis is a very common disease, effecting more than 10% of the general population, le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silva, Leonardo Victor España Rueda, de Mello, João Ferreira, Mion, Olavo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16612519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31262-3
_version_ 1784782713143689216
author Silva, Leonardo Victor España Rueda
de Mello, João Ferreira
Mion, Olavo
author_facet Silva, Leonardo Victor España Rueda
de Mello, João Ferreira
Mion, Olavo
author_sort Silva, Leonardo Victor España Rueda
collection PubMed
description Nowadays, the World Wide Web (Internet) is an information source for non-experts and physicians. Aim: To evaluate, based on ethical principles, Brazilian web sites information about “allergic rhinitis”. Allergic rhinitis is a very common disease, effecting more than 10% of the general population, leading to decrease in quality of life. Study design: review. Material and Method: We performed the evaluation of 173 Brazilian web sites, which were obtained from four search engines (Google, Yahoo, AltaVista and Radar Uol). The web sites were evaluated according to the Manual of Ethical Principles, Regional Council of Medicine of the state of Sao Paulo (CREMESP), regarding transparency, honesty, quality, privacy, medical ethics, informed consent, responsibility and origin. Results: Among the analyzed web sites, 149 (86.1%) were not in accordance with the Manual of Ethical Principles of Regional Council of Medicine of the state of Sao Paulo (CREMESP). According to the analyzed items, the irregularities that were found were quality (84.4%), privacy (46.2%), honesty (18.5%), informed consent (15.6%), responsibility and origin (13.9%), transparency (12.1%), medical ethics (2.3%). There was inaccurate information in 24.3% of the analyzed sites. Conclusions: The majority of the websites regarding allergic rhinitis are not in accordance with the ethical principles of CREMESP. In general, the quality of a great part of the Brazilian web sites that address “allergic rhinitis”, and the quality of the information disseminated by them, are insufficient to satisfy doctors and patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9441985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94419852022-09-09 Evaluation of Brazilian web site information on allergic rhinitis Silva, Leonardo Victor España Rueda de Mello, João Ferreira Mion, Olavo Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article Nowadays, the World Wide Web (Internet) is an information source for non-experts and physicians. Aim: To evaluate, based on ethical principles, Brazilian web sites information about “allergic rhinitis”. Allergic rhinitis is a very common disease, effecting more than 10% of the general population, leading to decrease in quality of life. Study design: review. Material and Method: We performed the evaluation of 173 Brazilian web sites, which were obtained from four search engines (Google, Yahoo, AltaVista and Radar Uol). The web sites were evaluated according to the Manual of Ethical Principles, Regional Council of Medicine of the state of Sao Paulo (CREMESP), regarding transparency, honesty, quality, privacy, medical ethics, informed consent, responsibility and origin. Results: Among the analyzed web sites, 149 (86.1%) were not in accordance with the Manual of Ethical Principles of Regional Council of Medicine of the state of Sao Paulo (CREMESP). According to the analyzed items, the irregularities that were found were quality (84.4%), privacy (46.2%), honesty (18.5%), informed consent (15.6%), responsibility and origin (13.9%), transparency (12.1%), medical ethics (2.3%). There was inaccurate information in 24.3% of the analyzed sites. Conclusions: The majority of the websites regarding allergic rhinitis are not in accordance with the ethical principles of CREMESP. In general, the quality of a great part of the Brazilian web sites that address “allergic rhinitis”, and the quality of the information disseminated by them, are insufficient to satisfy doctors and patients. Elsevier 2015-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9441985/ /pubmed/16612519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31262-3 Text en . https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Silva, Leonardo Victor España Rueda
de Mello, João Ferreira
Mion, Olavo
Evaluation of Brazilian web site information on allergic rhinitis
title Evaluation of Brazilian web site information on allergic rhinitis
title_full Evaluation of Brazilian web site information on allergic rhinitis
title_fullStr Evaluation of Brazilian web site information on allergic rhinitis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Brazilian web site information on allergic rhinitis
title_short Evaluation of Brazilian web site information on allergic rhinitis
title_sort evaluation of brazilian web site information on allergic rhinitis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16612519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31262-3
work_keys_str_mv AT silvaleonardovictorespanarueda evaluationofbrazilianwebsiteinformationonallergicrhinitis
AT demellojoaoferreira evaluationofbrazilianwebsiteinformationonallergicrhinitis
AT mionolavo evaluationofbrazilianwebsiteinformationonallergicrhinitis