Cargando…

Evaluation by imaging methods of cochlear implant candidates: radiological and surgical correlation

Evaluation by imaging methods is critical in the preoperative care of cochlear implant (CI) surgery, providing safety to surgeons when indicating and performing this procedure. The ideal imaging study consists of an association between Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Júnior, Luiz Rodolpho Pena Lima, Rocha, Marina David, Walsh, Priscilla Vargas, Antunes, Camila André, Calhau, Clara Maria Dias Ferreira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18661014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30574-7
_version_ 1784782731337531392
author Júnior, Luiz Rodolpho Pena Lima
Rocha, Marina David
Walsh, Priscilla Vargas
Antunes, Camila André
Calhau, Clara Maria Dias Ferreira
author_facet Júnior, Luiz Rodolpho Pena Lima
Rocha, Marina David
Walsh, Priscilla Vargas
Antunes, Camila André
Calhau, Clara Maria Dias Ferreira
author_sort Júnior, Luiz Rodolpho Pena Lima
collection PubMed
description Evaluation by imaging methods is critical in the preoperative care of cochlear implant (CI) surgery, providing safety to surgeons when indicating and performing this procedure. The ideal imaging study consists of an association between Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). AIM: To investigate the accuracy of imaging studies as predictors of possible complications of surgery. Study Design: A cross-sectional investigation. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The medical records of 104 patients undergoing CI surgery between May 2003 and October 2006 were studied. The preoperative muldisciplinary selection process included CT associated or not with MRI. RESULTS: The final sample was composed of 100 patients after 4 patients with no records of radiological exams were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups. The accuracy of group A (CT only) was 69.69%, the sensitivity was 36.36%, the specificity was 86.36%, the Positive Predictive Value (PPV) was 57.14%, and the Negative Predictive Value (NPV) was 73.07%; the accuracy of group B (CT and MRI) was 80.59%, the sensitivity was 38.46%, the specificity was 90.74%, the PPV was 50.0%, and the NPV was 85.96%. CONCLUSION: The preoperative radiological evaluation by CI was effective in identifying anatomic abnormalities, allowing surgeons to avoid, or at least be aware of, possible complications. This study demonstrated that CT and MRI were superior to CT alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9442093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94420932022-09-09 Evaluation by imaging methods of cochlear implant candidates: radiological and surgical correlation Júnior, Luiz Rodolpho Pena Lima Rocha, Marina David Walsh, Priscilla Vargas Antunes, Camila André Calhau, Clara Maria Dias Ferreira Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article Evaluation by imaging methods is critical in the preoperative care of cochlear implant (CI) surgery, providing safety to surgeons when indicating and performing this procedure. The ideal imaging study consists of an association between Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). AIM: To investigate the accuracy of imaging studies as predictors of possible complications of surgery. Study Design: A cross-sectional investigation. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The medical records of 104 patients undergoing CI surgery between May 2003 and October 2006 were studied. The preoperative muldisciplinary selection process included CT associated or not with MRI. RESULTS: The final sample was composed of 100 patients after 4 patients with no records of radiological exams were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups. The accuracy of group A (CT only) was 69.69%, the sensitivity was 36.36%, the specificity was 86.36%, the Positive Predictive Value (PPV) was 57.14%, and the Negative Predictive Value (NPV) was 73.07%; the accuracy of group B (CT and MRI) was 80.59%, the sensitivity was 38.46%, the specificity was 90.74%, the PPV was 50.0%, and the NPV was 85.96%. CONCLUSION: The preoperative radiological evaluation by CI was effective in identifying anatomic abnormalities, allowing surgeons to avoid, or at least be aware of, possible complications. This study demonstrated that CT and MRI were superior to CT alone. Elsevier 2015-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9442093/ /pubmed/18661014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30574-7 Text en . https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Júnior, Luiz Rodolpho Pena Lima
Rocha, Marina David
Walsh, Priscilla Vargas
Antunes, Camila André
Calhau, Clara Maria Dias Ferreira
Evaluation by imaging methods of cochlear implant candidates: radiological and surgical correlation
title Evaluation by imaging methods of cochlear implant candidates: radiological and surgical correlation
title_full Evaluation by imaging methods of cochlear implant candidates: radiological and surgical correlation
title_fullStr Evaluation by imaging methods of cochlear implant candidates: radiological and surgical correlation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation by imaging methods of cochlear implant candidates: radiological and surgical correlation
title_short Evaluation by imaging methods of cochlear implant candidates: radiological and surgical correlation
title_sort evaluation by imaging methods of cochlear implant candidates: radiological and surgical correlation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18661014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30574-7
work_keys_str_mv AT juniorluizrodolphopenalima evaluationbyimagingmethodsofcochlearimplantcandidatesradiologicalandsurgicalcorrelation
AT rochamarinadavid evaluationbyimagingmethodsofcochlearimplantcandidatesradiologicalandsurgicalcorrelation
AT walshpriscillavargas evaluationbyimagingmethodsofcochlearimplantcandidatesradiologicalandsurgicalcorrelation
AT antunescamilaandre evaluationbyimagingmethodsofcochlearimplantcandidatesradiologicalandsurgicalcorrelation
AT calhauclaramariadiasferreira evaluationbyimagingmethodsofcochlearimplantcandidatesradiologicalandsurgicalcorrelation