Cargando…

Australian perspectives on artificial intelligence in medical imaging

INTRODUCTION: While artificial intelligence (AI) and recent developments in deep learning (DL) have sparked interest in medical imaging, there has been little commentary on the impact of AI on imaging technologists. The aim of this survey was to understand the attitudes, applications and concerns am...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Currie, Geoffrey, Nelson, Tarni, Hewis, Johnathan, Chandler, Amanda, Spuur, Kelly, Nabasenja, Caroline, Thomas, Cate, Wheat, Janelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35429129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.581
_version_ 1784782780507357184
author Currie, Geoffrey
Nelson, Tarni
Hewis, Johnathan
Chandler, Amanda
Spuur, Kelly
Nabasenja, Caroline
Thomas, Cate
Wheat, Janelle
author_facet Currie, Geoffrey
Nelson, Tarni
Hewis, Johnathan
Chandler, Amanda
Spuur, Kelly
Nabasenja, Caroline
Thomas, Cate
Wheat, Janelle
author_sort Currie, Geoffrey
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: While artificial intelligence (AI) and recent developments in deep learning (DL) have sparked interest in medical imaging, there has been little commentary on the impact of AI on imaging technologists. The aim of this survey was to understand the attitudes, applications and concerns among nuclear medicine and radiography professionals in Australia with regard to the rapidly emerging applications of AI. METHODS: An anonymous online survey with invitation to participate was circulated to nuclear medicine and radiography members of the Rural Alliance in Nuclear Scintigraphy and the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy. The survey invitations were sent to members via email and as a push via social media with the survey open for 10 weeks. All information collected was anonymised and there is no disclosure of personal information as it was de‐identified from commencement. RESULTS: Among the 102 respondents, there was a high level of acceptance of lower order tasks (e.g. patient registration, triaging and dispensing) and less acceptance of high order task automation (e.g. surgery and interpretation). There was a low priority perception for the role of AI in higher order tasks (e.g. diagnosis, interpretation and decision making) and high priority for those applications that automate complex tasks (e.g. quantitation, segmentation, reconstruction) or improve image quality (e.g. dose / noise reduction and pseudo CT for attenuation correction). Medico‐legal, ethical, diversity and privacy issues posed moderate or high concern while there appeared to be no concern regarding AI being clinically useful and improving efficiency. Mild concerns included redundancy, training bias, transparency and validity. CONCLUSION: Australian nuclear medicine technologists and radiographers recognise important applications of AI for assisting with repetitive tasks, performing less complex tasks and enhancing the quality of outputs in medical imaging. There are concerns relating to ethical aspects of algorithm development and implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9442287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94422872022-09-09 Australian perspectives on artificial intelligence in medical imaging Currie, Geoffrey Nelson, Tarni Hewis, Johnathan Chandler, Amanda Spuur, Kelly Nabasenja, Caroline Thomas, Cate Wheat, Janelle J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: While artificial intelligence (AI) and recent developments in deep learning (DL) have sparked interest in medical imaging, there has been little commentary on the impact of AI on imaging technologists. The aim of this survey was to understand the attitudes, applications and concerns among nuclear medicine and radiography professionals in Australia with regard to the rapidly emerging applications of AI. METHODS: An anonymous online survey with invitation to participate was circulated to nuclear medicine and radiography members of the Rural Alliance in Nuclear Scintigraphy and the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy. The survey invitations were sent to members via email and as a push via social media with the survey open for 10 weeks. All information collected was anonymised and there is no disclosure of personal information as it was de‐identified from commencement. RESULTS: Among the 102 respondents, there was a high level of acceptance of lower order tasks (e.g. patient registration, triaging and dispensing) and less acceptance of high order task automation (e.g. surgery and interpretation). There was a low priority perception for the role of AI in higher order tasks (e.g. diagnosis, interpretation and decision making) and high priority for those applications that automate complex tasks (e.g. quantitation, segmentation, reconstruction) or improve image quality (e.g. dose / noise reduction and pseudo CT for attenuation correction). Medico‐legal, ethical, diversity and privacy issues posed moderate or high concern while there appeared to be no concern regarding AI being clinically useful and improving efficiency. Mild concerns included redundancy, training bias, transparency and validity. CONCLUSION: Australian nuclear medicine technologists and radiographers recognise important applications of AI for assisting with repetitive tasks, performing less complex tasks and enhancing the quality of outputs in medical imaging. There are concerns relating to ethical aspects of algorithm development and implementation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-15 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9442287/ /pubmed/35429129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.581 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Currie, Geoffrey
Nelson, Tarni
Hewis, Johnathan
Chandler, Amanda
Spuur, Kelly
Nabasenja, Caroline
Thomas, Cate
Wheat, Janelle
Australian perspectives on artificial intelligence in medical imaging
title Australian perspectives on artificial intelligence in medical imaging
title_full Australian perspectives on artificial intelligence in medical imaging
title_fullStr Australian perspectives on artificial intelligence in medical imaging
title_full_unstemmed Australian perspectives on artificial intelligence in medical imaging
title_short Australian perspectives on artificial intelligence in medical imaging
title_sort australian perspectives on artificial intelligence in medical imaging
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35429129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.581
work_keys_str_mv AT curriegeoffrey australianperspectivesonartificialintelligenceinmedicalimaging
AT nelsontarni australianperspectivesonartificialintelligenceinmedicalimaging
AT hewisjohnathan australianperspectivesonartificialintelligenceinmedicalimaging
AT chandleramanda australianperspectivesonartificialintelligenceinmedicalimaging
AT spuurkelly australianperspectivesonartificialintelligenceinmedicalimaging
AT nabasenjacaroline australianperspectivesonartificialintelligenceinmedicalimaging
AT thomascate australianperspectivesonartificialintelligenceinmedicalimaging
AT wheatjanelle australianperspectivesonartificialintelligenceinmedicalimaging