Cargando…
Australian perspectives on artificial intelligence in medical imaging
INTRODUCTION: While artificial intelligence (AI) and recent developments in deep learning (DL) have sparked interest in medical imaging, there has been little commentary on the impact of AI on imaging technologists. The aim of this survey was to understand the attitudes, applications and concerns am...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442287/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35429129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.581 |
_version_ | 1784782780507357184 |
---|---|
author | Currie, Geoffrey Nelson, Tarni Hewis, Johnathan Chandler, Amanda Spuur, Kelly Nabasenja, Caroline Thomas, Cate Wheat, Janelle |
author_facet | Currie, Geoffrey Nelson, Tarni Hewis, Johnathan Chandler, Amanda Spuur, Kelly Nabasenja, Caroline Thomas, Cate Wheat, Janelle |
author_sort | Currie, Geoffrey |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: While artificial intelligence (AI) and recent developments in deep learning (DL) have sparked interest in medical imaging, there has been little commentary on the impact of AI on imaging technologists. The aim of this survey was to understand the attitudes, applications and concerns among nuclear medicine and radiography professionals in Australia with regard to the rapidly emerging applications of AI. METHODS: An anonymous online survey with invitation to participate was circulated to nuclear medicine and radiography members of the Rural Alliance in Nuclear Scintigraphy and the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy. The survey invitations were sent to members via email and as a push via social media with the survey open for 10 weeks. All information collected was anonymised and there is no disclosure of personal information as it was de‐identified from commencement. RESULTS: Among the 102 respondents, there was a high level of acceptance of lower order tasks (e.g. patient registration, triaging and dispensing) and less acceptance of high order task automation (e.g. surgery and interpretation). There was a low priority perception for the role of AI in higher order tasks (e.g. diagnosis, interpretation and decision making) and high priority for those applications that automate complex tasks (e.g. quantitation, segmentation, reconstruction) or improve image quality (e.g. dose / noise reduction and pseudo CT for attenuation correction). Medico‐legal, ethical, diversity and privacy issues posed moderate or high concern while there appeared to be no concern regarding AI being clinically useful and improving efficiency. Mild concerns included redundancy, training bias, transparency and validity. CONCLUSION: Australian nuclear medicine technologists and radiographers recognise important applications of AI for assisting with repetitive tasks, performing less complex tasks and enhancing the quality of outputs in medical imaging. There are concerns relating to ethical aspects of algorithm development and implementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9442287 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94422872022-09-09 Australian perspectives on artificial intelligence in medical imaging Currie, Geoffrey Nelson, Tarni Hewis, Johnathan Chandler, Amanda Spuur, Kelly Nabasenja, Caroline Thomas, Cate Wheat, Janelle J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: While artificial intelligence (AI) and recent developments in deep learning (DL) have sparked interest in medical imaging, there has been little commentary on the impact of AI on imaging technologists. The aim of this survey was to understand the attitudes, applications and concerns among nuclear medicine and radiography professionals in Australia with regard to the rapidly emerging applications of AI. METHODS: An anonymous online survey with invitation to participate was circulated to nuclear medicine and radiography members of the Rural Alliance in Nuclear Scintigraphy and the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy. The survey invitations were sent to members via email and as a push via social media with the survey open for 10 weeks. All information collected was anonymised and there is no disclosure of personal information as it was de‐identified from commencement. RESULTS: Among the 102 respondents, there was a high level of acceptance of lower order tasks (e.g. patient registration, triaging and dispensing) and less acceptance of high order task automation (e.g. surgery and interpretation). There was a low priority perception for the role of AI in higher order tasks (e.g. diagnosis, interpretation and decision making) and high priority for those applications that automate complex tasks (e.g. quantitation, segmentation, reconstruction) or improve image quality (e.g. dose / noise reduction and pseudo CT for attenuation correction). Medico‐legal, ethical, diversity and privacy issues posed moderate or high concern while there appeared to be no concern regarding AI being clinically useful and improving efficiency. Mild concerns included redundancy, training bias, transparency and validity. CONCLUSION: Australian nuclear medicine technologists and radiographers recognise important applications of AI for assisting with repetitive tasks, performing less complex tasks and enhancing the quality of outputs in medical imaging. There are concerns relating to ethical aspects of algorithm development and implementation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-15 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9442287/ /pubmed/35429129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.581 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Currie, Geoffrey Nelson, Tarni Hewis, Johnathan Chandler, Amanda Spuur, Kelly Nabasenja, Caroline Thomas, Cate Wheat, Janelle Australian perspectives on artificial intelligence in medical imaging |
title | Australian perspectives on artificial intelligence in medical imaging |
title_full | Australian perspectives on artificial intelligence in medical imaging |
title_fullStr | Australian perspectives on artificial intelligence in medical imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Australian perspectives on artificial intelligence in medical imaging |
title_short | Australian perspectives on artificial intelligence in medical imaging |
title_sort | australian perspectives on artificial intelligence in medical imaging |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442287/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35429129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.581 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT curriegeoffrey australianperspectivesonartificialintelligenceinmedicalimaging AT nelsontarni australianperspectivesonartificialintelligenceinmedicalimaging AT hewisjohnathan australianperspectivesonartificialintelligenceinmedicalimaging AT chandleramanda australianperspectivesonartificialintelligenceinmedicalimaging AT spuurkelly australianperspectivesonartificialintelligenceinmedicalimaging AT nabasenjacaroline australianperspectivesonartificialintelligenceinmedicalimaging AT thomascate australianperspectivesonartificialintelligenceinmedicalimaging AT wheatjanelle australianperspectivesonartificialintelligenceinmedicalimaging |