Cargando…

Lived experiences of radiation therapists using health literacy strategies with patients—A qualitative review using interpretative phenomenological analysis

INTRODUCTION: Adaptive communication is an essential requirement to deliver quality patient‐centred care. Determining patients’ informational needs and acting on the needs are skills radiation therapists (RTs) employ daily with patients. Learning health literacy (HL) strategies to assist with the in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kelly, Toni, Thompson, Jennifer D, Surjan, Yolanda, Rinks, Marianne, Warren‐Forward, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35289107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.574
_version_ 1784782781527621632
author Kelly, Toni
Thompson, Jennifer D
Surjan, Yolanda
Rinks, Marianne
Warren‐Forward, Helen
author_facet Kelly, Toni
Thompson, Jennifer D
Surjan, Yolanda
Rinks, Marianne
Warren‐Forward, Helen
author_sort Kelly, Toni
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Adaptive communication is an essential requirement to deliver quality patient‐centred care. Determining patients’ informational needs and acting on the needs are skills radiation therapists (RTs) employ daily with patients. Learning health literacy (HL) strategies to assist with the informational delivery provides RTs with options to improve patients’ understanding of vital radiotherapy treatment information or tasks. This research investigates the lived experiences of RTs from the Illawarra and Shoalhaven Cancer Care Centres in Australia using HL strategies during patient interactions after undertaking HL training workshops. METHODS: An interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach was used. Audio‐recorded semi‐structured interviews were conducted with six RTs. Two reviewers analysed each interview script separately before discussing and constructing substantive and sub‐themes. RESULTS: Four substantive themes were constructed: RT personal attitudes and responses to HL, HL strategies used by RTs, patient associated HL needs and barriers when addressing patient HL needs. RTs were either person‐ or process‐focussed during patient interactions. It was identified that information is provided to patients according to how RTs themselves like to learn new information. CONCLUSION: This research has allowed an opportunity to inquire into the lived experiences of RTs implementing HL strategies when providing information to patients. While RTs may be person or process‐focussed, the patient’s needs are always prioritised when providing information, which ultimately results in patient understanding and increased engagement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9442295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94422952022-09-09 Lived experiences of radiation therapists using health literacy strategies with patients—A qualitative review using interpretative phenomenological analysis Kelly, Toni Thompson, Jennifer D Surjan, Yolanda Rinks, Marianne Warren‐Forward, Helen J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Adaptive communication is an essential requirement to deliver quality patient‐centred care. Determining patients’ informational needs and acting on the needs are skills radiation therapists (RTs) employ daily with patients. Learning health literacy (HL) strategies to assist with the informational delivery provides RTs with options to improve patients’ understanding of vital radiotherapy treatment information or tasks. This research investigates the lived experiences of RTs from the Illawarra and Shoalhaven Cancer Care Centres in Australia using HL strategies during patient interactions after undertaking HL training workshops. METHODS: An interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach was used. Audio‐recorded semi‐structured interviews were conducted with six RTs. Two reviewers analysed each interview script separately before discussing and constructing substantive and sub‐themes. RESULTS: Four substantive themes were constructed: RT personal attitudes and responses to HL, HL strategies used by RTs, patient associated HL needs and barriers when addressing patient HL needs. RTs were either person‐ or process‐focussed during patient interactions. It was identified that information is provided to patients according to how RTs themselves like to learn new information. CONCLUSION: This research has allowed an opportunity to inquire into the lived experiences of RTs implementing HL strategies when providing information to patients. While RTs may be person or process‐focussed, the patient’s needs are always prioritised when providing information, which ultimately results in patient understanding and increased engagement. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-14 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9442295/ /pubmed/35289107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.574 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kelly, Toni
Thompson, Jennifer D
Surjan, Yolanda
Rinks, Marianne
Warren‐Forward, Helen
Lived experiences of radiation therapists using health literacy strategies with patients—A qualitative review using interpretative phenomenological analysis
title Lived experiences of radiation therapists using health literacy strategies with patients—A qualitative review using interpretative phenomenological analysis
title_full Lived experiences of radiation therapists using health literacy strategies with patients—A qualitative review using interpretative phenomenological analysis
title_fullStr Lived experiences of radiation therapists using health literacy strategies with patients—A qualitative review using interpretative phenomenological analysis
title_full_unstemmed Lived experiences of radiation therapists using health literacy strategies with patients—A qualitative review using interpretative phenomenological analysis
title_short Lived experiences of radiation therapists using health literacy strategies with patients—A qualitative review using interpretative phenomenological analysis
title_sort lived experiences of radiation therapists using health literacy strategies with patients—a qualitative review using interpretative phenomenological analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35289107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.574
work_keys_str_mv AT kellytoni livedexperiencesofradiationtherapistsusinghealthliteracystrategieswithpatientsaqualitativereviewusinginterpretativephenomenologicalanalysis
AT thompsonjenniferd livedexperiencesofradiationtherapistsusinghealthliteracystrategieswithpatientsaqualitativereviewusinginterpretativephenomenologicalanalysis
AT surjanyolanda livedexperiencesofradiationtherapistsusinghealthliteracystrategieswithpatientsaqualitativereviewusinginterpretativephenomenologicalanalysis
AT rinksmarianne livedexperiencesofradiationtherapistsusinghealthliteracystrategieswithpatientsaqualitativereviewusinginterpretativephenomenologicalanalysis
AT warrenforwardhelen livedexperiencesofradiationtherapistsusinghealthliteracystrategieswithpatientsaqualitativereviewusinginterpretativephenomenologicalanalysis