Cargando…

Septoplasty with or without postoperative nasal packing? Prospective study

Anterior nasal packing is carried out in a number of nasal surgeries, especially in septoplasty. However, it is not an innocuous procedure and for this its benefit has been challenged. OBJECTIVE: To assess the need for anterior nasal packing and the quality of life of patients submitted to septoplas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernardo, Maria Teresa, Alves, Sandra, Lima, Nuno Barros, Helena, Diamantino, Condé, Artur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23929148
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20130084
_version_ 1784782802892357632
author Bernardo, Maria Teresa
Alves, Sandra
Lima, Nuno Barros
Helena, Diamantino
Condé, Artur
author_facet Bernardo, Maria Teresa
Alves, Sandra
Lima, Nuno Barros
Helena, Diamantino
Condé, Artur
author_sort Bernardo, Maria Teresa
collection PubMed
description Anterior nasal packing is carried out in a number of nasal surgeries, especially in septoplasty. However, it is not an innocuous procedure and for this its benefit has been challenged. OBJECTIVE: To assess the need for anterior nasal packing and the quality of life of patients submitted to septoplasty. METHOD: Patients submitted to septoplasty with or without inferior turbinoplasty were randomized to receive or not anterior nasal packing postoperatively. We recorded and compared postoperative data (pain and bleeding). Quality of life was assessed before and after surgery. This is a randomized prospective study. RESULTS: We had 73 patients (37 packed and 36 who did not receive a nasal packing) with a minimum follow-up of 3 months. Patients with nasal packing complained more of nasal pain and headache in the immediate postoperative period. Of these patients, 75.7% reported moderate/intense pain upon nasal packing removal. Bleeding was more frequent in those patients who did not receive a nasal packing, and only 1 patient required packing. All the patients enjoyed an improvement in quality of life. CONCLUSION: Septoplasty improves the quality of life of patients with septal deviation and nasal obstruction. Routine use of anterior nasal packing should be challenged for not presenting proven benefit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9442385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94423852022-09-09 Septoplasty with or without postoperative nasal packing? Prospective study Bernardo, Maria Teresa Alves, Sandra Lima, Nuno Barros Helena, Diamantino Condé, Artur Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article Anterior nasal packing is carried out in a number of nasal surgeries, especially in septoplasty. However, it is not an innocuous procedure and for this its benefit has been challenged. OBJECTIVE: To assess the need for anterior nasal packing and the quality of life of patients submitted to septoplasty. METHOD: Patients submitted to septoplasty with or without inferior turbinoplasty were randomized to receive or not anterior nasal packing postoperatively. We recorded and compared postoperative data (pain and bleeding). Quality of life was assessed before and after surgery. This is a randomized prospective study. RESULTS: We had 73 patients (37 packed and 36 who did not receive a nasal packing) with a minimum follow-up of 3 months. Patients with nasal packing complained more of nasal pain and headache in the immediate postoperative period. Of these patients, 75.7% reported moderate/intense pain upon nasal packing removal. Bleeding was more frequent in those patients who did not receive a nasal packing, and only 1 patient required packing. All the patients enjoyed an improvement in quality of life. CONCLUSION: Septoplasty improves the quality of life of patients with septal deviation and nasal obstruction. Routine use of anterior nasal packing should be challenged for not presenting proven benefit. Elsevier 2015-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9442385/ /pubmed/23929148 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20130084 Text en . https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Bernardo, Maria Teresa
Alves, Sandra
Lima, Nuno Barros
Helena, Diamantino
Condé, Artur
Septoplasty with or without postoperative nasal packing? Prospective study
title Septoplasty with or without postoperative nasal packing? Prospective study
title_full Septoplasty with or without postoperative nasal packing? Prospective study
title_fullStr Septoplasty with or without postoperative nasal packing? Prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Septoplasty with or without postoperative nasal packing? Prospective study
title_short Septoplasty with or without postoperative nasal packing? Prospective study
title_sort septoplasty with or without postoperative nasal packing? prospective study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23929148
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20130084
work_keys_str_mv AT bernardomariateresa septoplastywithorwithoutpostoperativenasalpackingprospectivestudy
AT alvessandra septoplastywithorwithoutpostoperativenasalpackingprospectivestudy
AT limanunobarros septoplastywithorwithoutpostoperativenasalpackingprospectivestudy
AT helenadiamantino septoplastywithorwithoutpostoperativenasalpackingprospectivestudy
AT condeartur septoplastywithorwithoutpostoperativenasalpackingprospectivestudy