Cargando…
Long-latency auditory evoked potentials with verbal and nonverbal stimuli()()
INTRODUCTION: Long-latency auditory evoked potentials represent the cortical activity related to attention, memory, and auditory discrimination skills. Acoustic signal processing occurs differently between verbal and nonverbal stimuli, influencing the latency and amplitude patterns. OBJECTIVE: To de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26480901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.10.005 |
_version_ | 1784782873981616128 |
---|---|
author | Oppitz, Sheila Jacques Didoné, Dayane Domeneghini da Silva, Débora Durigon Gois, Marjana Folgearini, Jordana Ferreira, Geise Corrêa Garcia, Michele Vargas |
author_facet | Oppitz, Sheila Jacques Didoné, Dayane Domeneghini da Silva, Débora Durigon Gois, Marjana Folgearini, Jordana Ferreira, Geise Corrêa Garcia, Michele Vargas |
author_sort | Oppitz, Sheila Jacques |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Long-latency auditory evoked potentials represent the cortical activity related to attention, memory, and auditory discrimination skills. Acoustic signal processing occurs differently between verbal and nonverbal stimuli, influencing the latency and amplitude patterns. OBJECTIVE: To describe the latencies of the cortical potentials P1, N1, P2, N2, and P3, as well as P3 amplitude, with different speech stimuli and tone bursts, and to classify them in the presence and absence of these data. METHODS: A total of 30 subjects with normal hearing were assessed, aged 18–32 years old, matched by gender. Nonverbal stimuli were used (tone burst; 1000 Hz – frequent and 4000 Hz – rare); and verbal (/ba/ – frequent; /ga/, /da/, and /di/ – rare). RESULTS: Considering the component N2 for tone burst, the lowest latency found was 217.45 ms for the BA/DI stimulus; the highest latency found was 256.5 ms. For the P3 component, the shortest latency with tone burst stimuli was 298.7 with BA/GA stimuli, the highest, was 340 ms. For the P3 amplitude, there was no statistically significant difference among the different stimuli. For latencies of components P1, N1, P2, N2, P3, there were no statistical differences among them, regardless of the stimuli used. CONCLUSION: There was a difference in the latency of potentials N2 and P3 among the stimuli employed but no difference was observed for the P3 amplitude. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9442689 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94426892022-09-09 Long-latency auditory evoked potentials with verbal and nonverbal stimuli()() Oppitz, Sheila Jacques Didoné, Dayane Domeneghini da Silva, Débora Durigon Gois, Marjana Folgearini, Jordana Ferreira, Geise Corrêa Garcia, Michele Vargas Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Long-latency auditory evoked potentials represent the cortical activity related to attention, memory, and auditory discrimination skills. Acoustic signal processing occurs differently between verbal and nonverbal stimuli, influencing the latency and amplitude patterns. OBJECTIVE: To describe the latencies of the cortical potentials P1, N1, P2, N2, and P3, as well as P3 amplitude, with different speech stimuli and tone bursts, and to classify them in the presence and absence of these data. METHODS: A total of 30 subjects with normal hearing were assessed, aged 18–32 years old, matched by gender. Nonverbal stimuli were used (tone burst; 1000 Hz – frequent and 4000 Hz – rare); and verbal (/ba/ – frequent; /ga/, /da/, and /di/ – rare). RESULTS: Considering the component N2 for tone burst, the lowest latency found was 217.45 ms for the BA/DI stimulus; the highest latency found was 256.5 ms. For the P3 component, the shortest latency with tone burst stimuli was 298.7 with BA/GA stimuli, the highest, was 340 ms. For the P3 amplitude, there was no statistically significant difference among the different stimuli. For latencies of components P1, N1, P2, N2, P3, there were no statistical differences among them, regardless of the stimuli used. CONCLUSION: There was a difference in the latency of potentials N2 and P3 among the stimuli employed but no difference was observed for the P3 amplitude. Elsevier 2015-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9442689/ /pubmed/26480901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.10.005 Text en © 2015 Associac¸ão Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Oppitz, Sheila Jacques Didoné, Dayane Domeneghini da Silva, Débora Durigon Gois, Marjana Folgearini, Jordana Ferreira, Geise Corrêa Garcia, Michele Vargas Long-latency auditory evoked potentials with verbal and nonverbal stimuli()() |
title | Long-latency auditory evoked potentials with verbal and nonverbal stimuli()() |
title_full | Long-latency auditory evoked potentials with verbal and nonverbal stimuli()() |
title_fullStr | Long-latency auditory evoked potentials with verbal and nonverbal stimuli()() |
title_full_unstemmed | Long-latency auditory evoked potentials with verbal and nonverbal stimuli()() |
title_short | Long-latency auditory evoked potentials with verbal and nonverbal stimuli()() |
title_sort | long-latency auditory evoked potentials with verbal and nonverbal stimuli()() |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26480901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.10.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oppitzsheilajacques longlatencyauditoryevokedpotentialswithverbalandnonverbalstimuli AT didonedayanedomeneghini longlatencyauditoryevokedpotentialswithverbalandnonverbalstimuli AT dasilvadeboradurigon longlatencyauditoryevokedpotentialswithverbalandnonverbalstimuli AT goismarjana longlatencyauditoryevokedpotentialswithverbalandnonverbalstimuli AT folgearinijordana longlatencyauditoryevokedpotentialswithverbalandnonverbalstimuli AT ferreirageisecorrea longlatencyauditoryevokedpotentialswithverbalandnonverbalstimuli AT garciamichelevargas longlatencyauditoryevokedpotentialswithverbalandnonverbalstimuli |