Cargando…

Long-latency auditory evoked potentials with verbal and nonverbal stimuli()()

INTRODUCTION: Long-latency auditory evoked potentials represent the cortical activity related to attention, memory, and auditory discrimination skills. Acoustic signal processing occurs differently between verbal and nonverbal stimuli, influencing the latency and amplitude patterns. OBJECTIVE: To de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oppitz, Sheila Jacques, Didoné, Dayane Domeneghini, da Silva, Débora Durigon, Gois, Marjana, Folgearini, Jordana, Ferreira, Geise Corrêa, Garcia, Michele Vargas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26480901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.10.005
_version_ 1784782873981616128
author Oppitz, Sheila Jacques
Didoné, Dayane Domeneghini
da Silva, Débora Durigon
Gois, Marjana
Folgearini, Jordana
Ferreira, Geise Corrêa
Garcia, Michele Vargas
author_facet Oppitz, Sheila Jacques
Didoné, Dayane Domeneghini
da Silva, Débora Durigon
Gois, Marjana
Folgearini, Jordana
Ferreira, Geise Corrêa
Garcia, Michele Vargas
author_sort Oppitz, Sheila Jacques
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Long-latency auditory evoked potentials represent the cortical activity related to attention, memory, and auditory discrimination skills. Acoustic signal processing occurs differently between verbal and nonverbal stimuli, influencing the latency and amplitude patterns. OBJECTIVE: To describe the latencies of the cortical potentials P1, N1, P2, N2, and P3, as well as P3 amplitude, with different speech stimuli and tone bursts, and to classify them in the presence and absence of these data. METHODS: A total of 30 subjects with normal hearing were assessed, aged 18–32 years old, matched by gender. Nonverbal stimuli were used (tone burst; 1000 Hz – frequent and 4000 Hz – rare); and verbal (/ba/ – frequent; /ga/, /da/, and /di/ – rare). RESULTS: Considering the component N2 for tone burst, the lowest latency found was 217.45 ms for the BA/DI stimulus; the highest latency found was 256.5 ms. For the P3 component, the shortest latency with tone burst stimuli was 298.7 with BA/GA stimuli, the highest, was 340 ms. For the P3 amplitude, there was no statistically significant difference among the different stimuli. For latencies of components P1, N1, P2, N2, P3, there were no statistical differences among them, regardless of the stimuli used. CONCLUSION: There was a difference in the latency of potentials N2 and P3 among the stimuli employed but no difference was observed for the P3 amplitude.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9442689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94426892022-09-09 Long-latency auditory evoked potentials with verbal and nonverbal stimuli()() Oppitz, Sheila Jacques Didoné, Dayane Domeneghini da Silva, Débora Durigon Gois, Marjana Folgearini, Jordana Ferreira, Geise Corrêa Garcia, Michele Vargas Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Long-latency auditory evoked potentials represent the cortical activity related to attention, memory, and auditory discrimination skills. Acoustic signal processing occurs differently between verbal and nonverbal stimuli, influencing the latency and amplitude patterns. OBJECTIVE: To describe the latencies of the cortical potentials P1, N1, P2, N2, and P3, as well as P3 amplitude, with different speech stimuli and tone bursts, and to classify them in the presence and absence of these data. METHODS: A total of 30 subjects with normal hearing were assessed, aged 18–32 years old, matched by gender. Nonverbal stimuli were used (tone burst; 1000 Hz – frequent and 4000 Hz – rare); and verbal (/ba/ – frequent; /ga/, /da/, and /di/ – rare). RESULTS: Considering the component N2 for tone burst, the lowest latency found was 217.45 ms for the BA/DI stimulus; the highest latency found was 256.5 ms. For the P3 component, the shortest latency with tone burst stimuli was 298.7 with BA/GA stimuli, the highest, was 340 ms. For the P3 amplitude, there was no statistically significant difference among the different stimuli. For latencies of components P1, N1, P2, N2, P3, there were no statistical differences among them, regardless of the stimuli used. CONCLUSION: There was a difference in the latency of potentials N2 and P3 among the stimuli employed but no difference was observed for the P3 amplitude. Elsevier 2015-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9442689/ /pubmed/26480901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.10.005 Text en © 2015 Associac¸ão Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Oppitz, Sheila Jacques
Didoné, Dayane Domeneghini
da Silva, Débora Durigon
Gois, Marjana
Folgearini, Jordana
Ferreira, Geise Corrêa
Garcia, Michele Vargas
Long-latency auditory evoked potentials with verbal and nonverbal stimuli()()
title Long-latency auditory evoked potentials with verbal and nonverbal stimuli()()
title_full Long-latency auditory evoked potentials with verbal and nonverbal stimuli()()
title_fullStr Long-latency auditory evoked potentials with verbal and nonverbal stimuli()()
title_full_unstemmed Long-latency auditory evoked potentials with verbal and nonverbal stimuli()()
title_short Long-latency auditory evoked potentials with verbal and nonverbal stimuli()()
title_sort long-latency auditory evoked potentials with verbal and nonverbal stimuli()()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26480901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.10.005
work_keys_str_mv AT oppitzsheilajacques longlatencyauditoryevokedpotentialswithverbalandnonverbalstimuli
AT didonedayanedomeneghini longlatencyauditoryevokedpotentialswithverbalandnonverbalstimuli
AT dasilvadeboradurigon longlatencyauditoryevokedpotentialswithverbalandnonverbalstimuli
AT goismarjana longlatencyauditoryevokedpotentialswithverbalandnonverbalstimuli
AT folgearinijordana longlatencyauditoryevokedpotentialswithverbalandnonverbalstimuli
AT ferreirageisecorrea longlatencyauditoryevokedpotentialswithverbalandnonverbalstimuli
AT garciamichelevargas longlatencyauditoryevokedpotentialswithverbalandnonverbalstimuli