Cargando…

Comparative study between biopsy and brushing sampling methods for detection of human papillomavirus in oral and oropharyngeal cavity lesions()()

INTRODUCTION: Many epidemiological studies have suggested that human papillomavirus (HPV), especially type 16, is involved in the genesis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx, especially in young, non-smoking patients; thus, its detection in lesions in this region is importan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marques, Marise da Penha Costa, Bussoloti Filho, Ivo, Rossi, Lia Mara, Andreoli, Maria Antonieta, Cruz, Natália Oliveira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26475771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.08.007
_version_ 1784782879437357056
author Marques, Marise da Penha Costa
Bussoloti Filho, Ivo
Rossi, Lia Mara
Andreoli, Maria Antonieta
Cruz, Natália Oliveira
author_facet Marques, Marise da Penha Costa
Bussoloti Filho, Ivo
Rossi, Lia Mara
Andreoli, Maria Antonieta
Cruz, Natália Oliveira
author_sort Marques, Marise da Penha Costa
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Many epidemiological studies have suggested that human papillomavirus (HPV), especially type 16, is involved in the genesis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx, especially in young, non-smoking patients; thus, its detection in lesions in this region is important. OBJECTIVE: To clarify the capacity of the brushing sampling method to detect the presence of HPV in oral or oropharyngeal lesions through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, and to compare the results with those obtained by biopsy. METHODS: Prospective study of adult patients with oral or oropharyngeal lesions assessed by PCR, comparing biopsy specimens with samples obtained by the brushing method. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the institution. RESULTS: A total of 35 sample pairs were analyzed, but 45.7% of the brushing samples were inadequate (16/35) and, thus, only 19 pairs could be compared. There was agreement of results in 94.7% (18/19) of the pairs, with HPV identified in 16 of them. HPV DNA was detected in 8.6% (3/35) of biopsy and 5.7% (2/35) of brushing samples. CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference between the two methods, but the brushing sampling method showed a higher number of inadequate samples, suggesting that it is an unreliable method for surveillance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9442710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94427102022-09-09 Comparative study between biopsy and brushing sampling methods for detection of human papillomavirus in oral and oropharyngeal cavity lesions()() Marques, Marise da Penha Costa Bussoloti Filho, Ivo Rossi, Lia Mara Andreoli, Maria Antonieta Cruz, Natália Oliveira Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Many epidemiological studies have suggested that human papillomavirus (HPV), especially type 16, is involved in the genesis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx, especially in young, non-smoking patients; thus, its detection in lesions in this region is important. OBJECTIVE: To clarify the capacity of the brushing sampling method to detect the presence of HPV in oral or oropharyngeal lesions through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing, and to compare the results with those obtained by biopsy. METHODS: Prospective study of adult patients with oral or oropharyngeal lesions assessed by PCR, comparing biopsy specimens with samples obtained by the brushing method. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the institution. RESULTS: A total of 35 sample pairs were analyzed, but 45.7% of the brushing samples were inadequate (16/35) and, thus, only 19 pairs could be compared. There was agreement of results in 94.7% (18/19) of the pairs, with HPV identified in 16 of them. HPV DNA was detected in 8.6% (3/35) of biopsy and 5.7% (2/35) of brushing samples. CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference between the two methods, but the brushing sampling method showed a higher number of inadequate samples, suggesting that it is an unreliable method for surveillance. Elsevier 2015-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9442710/ /pubmed/26475771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.08.007 Text en © 2015 Associac¸ão Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Marques, Marise da Penha Costa
Bussoloti Filho, Ivo
Rossi, Lia Mara
Andreoli, Maria Antonieta
Cruz, Natália Oliveira
Comparative study between biopsy and brushing sampling methods for detection of human papillomavirus in oral and oropharyngeal cavity lesions()()
title Comparative study between biopsy and brushing sampling methods for detection of human papillomavirus in oral and oropharyngeal cavity lesions()()
title_full Comparative study between biopsy and brushing sampling methods for detection of human papillomavirus in oral and oropharyngeal cavity lesions()()
title_fullStr Comparative study between biopsy and brushing sampling methods for detection of human papillomavirus in oral and oropharyngeal cavity lesions()()
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study between biopsy and brushing sampling methods for detection of human papillomavirus in oral and oropharyngeal cavity lesions()()
title_short Comparative study between biopsy and brushing sampling methods for detection of human papillomavirus in oral and oropharyngeal cavity lesions()()
title_sort comparative study between biopsy and brushing sampling methods for detection of human papillomavirus in oral and oropharyngeal cavity lesions()()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26475771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.08.007
work_keys_str_mv AT marquesmarisedapenhacosta comparativestudybetweenbiopsyandbrushingsamplingmethodsfordetectionofhumanpapillomavirusinoralandoropharyngealcavitylesions
AT bussolotifilhoivo comparativestudybetweenbiopsyandbrushingsamplingmethodsfordetectionofhumanpapillomavirusinoralandoropharyngealcavitylesions
AT rossiliamara comparativestudybetweenbiopsyandbrushingsamplingmethodsfordetectionofhumanpapillomavirusinoralandoropharyngealcavitylesions
AT andreolimariaantonieta comparativestudybetweenbiopsyandbrushingsamplingmethodsfordetectionofhumanpapillomavirusinoralandoropharyngealcavitylesions
AT cruznataliaoliveira comparativestudybetweenbiopsyandbrushingsamplingmethodsfordetectionofhumanpapillomavirusinoralandoropharyngealcavitylesions