Cargando…

Effect of conductive hearing loss on central auditory function()

INTRODUCTION: It has been demonstrated that long-term Conductive Hearing Loss (CHL) may influence the precise detection of the temporal features of acoustic signals or Auditory Temporal Processing (ATP). It can be argued that ATP may be the underlying component of many central auditory processing ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bayat, Arash, Farhadi, Mohammad, Emamdjomeh, Hesam, Saki, Nader, Mirmomeni, Golshan, Rahim, Fakher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27236631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.02.010
_version_ 1784782882161557504
author Bayat, Arash
Farhadi, Mohammad
Emamdjomeh, Hesam
Saki, Nader
Mirmomeni, Golshan
Rahim, Fakher
author_facet Bayat, Arash
Farhadi, Mohammad
Emamdjomeh, Hesam
Saki, Nader
Mirmomeni, Golshan
Rahim, Fakher
author_sort Bayat, Arash
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: It has been demonstrated that long-term Conductive Hearing Loss (CHL) may influence the precise detection of the temporal features of acoustic signals or Auditory Temporal Processing (ATP). It can be argued that ATP may be the underlying component of many central auditory processing capabilities such as speech comprehension or sound localization. Little is known about the consequences of CHL on temporal aspects of central auditory processing. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess auditory temporal processing ability in individuals with chronic CHL. METHODS: During this analytical cross-sectional study, 52 patients with mild to moderate chronic CHL and 52 normal-hearing listeners (control), aged between 18 and 45 year-old, were recruited. In order to evaluate auditory temporal processing, the Gaps-in-Noise (GIN) test was used. The results obtained for each ear were analyzed based on the gap perception threshold and the percentage of correct responses. RESULTS: The average of GIN thresholds was significantly smaller for the control group than for the CHL group for both ears (right: p = 0.004; left: p < 0.001). Individuals with CHL had significantly lower correct responses than individuals with normal hearing for both sides (p < 0.001). No correlation was found between GIN performance and degree of hearing loss in either group (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results suggest reduced auditory temporal processing ability in adults with CHL compared to normal hearing subjects. Therefore, developing a clinical protocol to evaluate auditory temporal processing in this population is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9442720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94427202022-09-09 Effect of conductive hearing loss on central auditory function() Bayat, Arash Farhadi, Mohammad Emamdjomeh, Hesam Saki, Nader Mirmomeni, Golshan Rahim, Fakher Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: It has been demonstrated that long-term Conductive Hearing Loss (CHL) may influence the precise detection of the temporal features of acoustic signals or Auditory Temporal Processing (ATP). It can be argued that ATP may be the underlying component of many central auditory processing capabilities such as speech comprehension or sound localization. Little is known about the consequences of CHL on temporal aspects of central auditory processing. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess auditory temporal processing ability in individuals with chronic CHL. METHODS: During this analytical cross-sectional study, 52 patients with mild to moderate chronic CHL and 52 normal-hearing listeners (control), aged between 18 and 45 year-old, were recruited. In order to evaluate auditory temporal processing, the Gaps-in-Noise (GIN) test was used. The results obtained for each ear were analyzed based on the gap perception threshold and the percentage of correct responses. RESULTS: The average of GIN thresholds was significantly smaller for the control group than for the CHL group for both ears (right: p = 0.004; left: p < 0.001). Individuals with CHL had significantly lower correct responses than individuals with normal hearing for both sides (p < 0.001). No correlation was found between GIN performance and degree of hearing loss in either group (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results suggest reduced auditory temporal processing ability in adults with CHL compared to normal hearing subjects. Therefore, developing a clinical protocol to evaluate auditory temporal processing in this population is recommended. Elsevier 2016-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9442720/ /pubmed/27236631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.02.010 Text en © 2017 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Bayat, Arash
Farhadi, Mohammad
Emamdjomeh, Hesam
Saki, Nader
Mirmomeni, Golshan
Rahim, Fakher
Effect of conductive hearing loss on central auditory function()
title Effect of conductive hearing loss on central auditory function()
title_full Effect of conductive hearing loss on central auditory function()
title_fullStr Effect of conductive hearing loss on central auditory function()
title_full_unstemmed Effect of conductive hearing loss on central auditory function()
title_short Effect of conductive hearing loss on central auditory function()
title_sort effect of conductive hearing loss on central auditory function()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27236631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.02.010
work_keys_str_mv AT bayatarash effectofconductivehearinglossoncentralauditoryfunction
AT farhadimohammad effectofconductivehearinglossoncentralauditoryfunction
AT emamdjomehhesam effectofconductivehearinglossoncentralauditoryfunction
AT sakinader effectofconductivehearinglossoncentralauditoryfunction
AT mirmomenigolshan effectofconductivehearinglossoncentralauditoryfunction
AT rahimfakher effectofconductivehearinglossoncentralauditoryfunction