Cargando…

Positioning of earphones and variations in auditory thresholds()()

INTRODUCTION: One of the problems observed in pure-tone audiometry tonal has been the variation in test results of a same individual, particularly at frequencies of 4 kHz, 6 kHz and/or 8 kHz. Improper placement of headphones is one of the factors that can cause alterations in results. OBJECTIVE: To...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almeida, Bettina Poggi, Menezes, Pedro de Lemos, de Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira, Teixeira, Cleide Fernandes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26454532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.08.016
_version_ 1784782891873468416
author Almeida, Bettina Poggi
Menezes, Pedro de Lemos
de Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira
Teixeira, Cleide Fernandes
author_facet Almeida, Bettina Poggi
Menezes, Pedro de Lemos
de Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira
Teixeira, Cleide Fernandes
author_sort Almeida, Bettina Poggi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: One of the problems observed in pure-tone audiometry tonal has been the variation in test results of a same individual, particularly at frequencies of 4 kHz, 6 kHz and/or 8 kHz. Improper placement of headphones is one of the factors that can cause alterations in results. OBJECTIVE: To compare differences in auditory thresholds using earphones positioned by the examiner and by the worker. METHODS: Clinical and experimental study conducted in 2009, with 324 workers aged between 19 and 61 years, with a mean of 33.29 years and mean exposure time of 7.67 years. All subjects were familiar with audiometry procedures. Auditory thresholds were obtained at frequencies of 0.25–8 kHz, with earphones positioned by the examiners, and at frequencies of 4, 6 and 8 kHz, with earphones placed by workers in a comfortable position, following the examiner's instructions. The thresholds obtained in these two situations were compared. RESULTS: The three frequencies exhibited better responses with earphones placed by the workers themselves (p < 0.001). At a frequency of 8 kHz a greater difference was found (p < 0.001), with a mean of 13.89 dB and standard deviation of 6.07 dB. CONCLUSION: Earphone placement by the workers themselves under supervision of the examiner results in improved mean auditory thresholds at frequencies of 4, 6 and 8 kHz, the last one significantly higher than the other two.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9442757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94427572022-09-09 Positioning of earphones and variations in auditory thresholds()() Almeida, Bettina Poggi Menezes, Pedro de Lemos de Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira Teixeira, Cleide Fernandes Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: One of the problems observed in pure-tone audiometry tonal has been the variation in test results of a same individual, particularly at frequencies of 4 kHz, 6 kHz and/or 8 kHz. Improper placement of headphones is one of the factors that can cause alterations in results. OBJECTIVE: To compare differences in auditory thresholds using earphones positioned by the examiner and by the worker. METHODS: Clinical and experimental study conducted in 2009, with 324 workers aged between 19 and 61 years, with a mean of 33.29 years and mean exposure time of 7.67 years. All subjects were familiar with audiometry procedures. Auditory thresholds were obtained at frequencies of 0.25–8 kHz, with earphones positioned by the examiners, and at frequencies of 4, 6 and 8 kHz, with earphones placed by workers in a comfortable position, following the examiner's instructions. The thresholds obtained in these two situations were compared. RESULTS: The three frequencies exhibited better responses with earphones placed by the workers themselves (p < 0.001). At a frequency of 8 kHz a greater difference was found (p < 0.001), with a mean of 13.89 dB and standard deviation of 6.07 dB. CONCLUSION: Earphone placement by the workers themselves under supervision of the examiner results in improved mean auditory thresholds at frequencies of 4, 6 and 8 kHz, the last one significantly higher than the other two. Elsevier 2015-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9442757/ /pubmed/26454532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.08.016 Text en © 2015 Associac¸ão Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Almeida, Bettina Poggi
Menezes, Pedro de Lemos
de Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira
Teixeira, Cleide Fernandes
Positioning of earphones and variations in auditory thresholds()()
title Positioning of earphones and variations in auditory thresholds()()
title_full Positioning of earphones and variations in auditory thresholds()()
title_fullStr Positioning of earphones and variations in auditory thresholds()()
title_full_unstemmed Positioning of earphones and variations in auditory thresholds()()
title_short Positioning of earphones and variations in auditory thresholds()()
title_sort positioning of earphones and variations in auditory thresholds()()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26454532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.08.016
work_keys_str_mv AT almeidabettinapoggi positioningofearphonesandvariationsinauditorythresholds
AT menezespedrodelemos positioningofearphonesandvariationsinauditorythresholds
AT deandradekellycristinalira positioningofearphonesandvariationsinauditorythresholds
AT teixeiracleidefernandes positioningofearphonesandvariationsinauditorythresholds