Cargando…

Revision rhinoplasty: physician–patient aesthetic and functional evaluation()

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 5–15% of patients submitted to rhinoplasty operations undergo revision surgery. Those patients have varied functional and aesthetic complaints that should receive a detailed assessment that includes all the expectations the patient had before the previous procedure. OBJEC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vian, Heloisa Nardi Koerner, Berger, Cezar Augusto Sarraff, Barra, Danielle Candia, Perin, Ana Paula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29074124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.08.011
_version_ 1784782908989374464
author Vian, Heloisa Nardi Koerner
Berger, Cezar Augusto Sarraff
Barra, Danielle Candia
Perin, Ana Paula
author_facet Vian, Heloisa Nardi Koerner
Berger, Cezar Augusto Sarraff
Barra, Danielle Candia
Perin, Ana Paula
author_sort Vian, Heloisa Nardi Koerner
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Approximately 5–15% of patients submitted to rhinoplasty operations undergo revision surgery. Those patients have varied functional and aesthetic complaints that should receive a detailed assessment that includes all the expectations the patient had before the previous procedure. OBJECTIVE: To draw the profile of the main aesthetic-functional complaints reported by patients to be submitted to revision rhinoplasty and to correlate them with the internal and external objective nasal evaluation performed by the surgeon. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted with 43 patients to be submitted to revision rhinoplasty and their respective surgeons, by applying a questionnaire about the patients’ epidemiological questions and subjective aesthetic-functional complaints as well as the respective functional deformities observed by the surgeons. Subsequently, these data were correlated with the purpose of observing the frequency of congruent reports between physicians and patients. RESULTS: The presence of drooping tip and residual bridge hump were the patients’ main complaints, confirmed by the surgeons. The correlation between subjective obstructive symptoms and the intranasal evaluation performed by surgeons was shown to be present in 87.5% of the cases. Among the patients with respiratory symptoms, the main deformity identified was residual septal deviation in 56.25% of the cases. CONCLUSION: The drooping tip followed by residual hump were the main complaints reported by the patients and confirmed by the objective examination by the physicians. The presence of nasal obstructive complaints in 37.2% of the patients shows that greater attention needs to be paid to functional deformities during the first surgical procedure. The differences observed between patients’ complaints and surgeons’ evaluations confirm the need for detailed assessment and clarification to the patients regarding their expectations and actual surgical possibilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9442826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94428262022-09-09 Revision rhinoplasty: physician–patient aesthetic and functional evaluation() Vian, Heloisa Nardi Koerner Berger, Cezar Augusto Sarraff Barra, Danielle Candia Perin, Ana Paula Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Approximately 5–15% of patients submitted to rhinoplasty operations undergo revision surgery. Those patients have varied functional and aesthetic complaints that should receive a detailed assessment that includes all the expectations the patient had before the previous procedure. OBJECTIVE: To draw the profile of the main aesthetic-functional complaints reported by patients to be submitted to revision rhinoplasty and to correlate them with the internal and external objective nasal evaluation performed by the surgeon. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted with 43 patients to be submitted to revision rhinoplasty and their respective surgeons, by applying a questionnaire about the patients’ epidemiological questions and subjective aesthetic-functional complaints as well as the respective functional deformities observed by the surgeons. Subsequently, these data were correlated with the purpose of observing the frequency of congruent reports between physicians and patients. RESULTS: The presence of drooping tip and residual bridge hump were the patients’ main complaints, confirmed by the surgeons. The correlation between subjective obstructive symptoms and the intranasal evaluation performed by surgeons was shown to be present in 87.5% of the cases. Among the patients with respiratory symptoms, the main deformity identified was residual septal deviation in 56.25% of the cases. CONCLUSION: The drooping tip followed by residual hump were the main complaints reported by the patients and confirmed by the objective examination by the physicians. The presence of nasal obstructive complaints in 37.2% of the patients shows that greater attention needs to be paid to functional deformities during the first surgical procedure. The differences observed between patients’ complaints and surgeons’ evaluations confirm the need for detailed assessment and clarification to the patients regarding their expectations and actual surgical possibilities. Elsevier 2017-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9442826/ /pubmed/29074124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.08.011 Text en © 2017 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Vian, Heloisa Nardi Koerner
Berger, Cezar Augusto Sarraff
Barra, Danielle Candia
Perin, Ana Paula
Revision rhinoplasty: physician–patient aesthetic and functional evaluation()
title Revision rhinoplasty: physician–patient aesthetic and functional evaluation()
title_full Revision rhinoplasty: physician–patient aesthetic and functional evaluation()
title_fullStr Revision rhinoplasty: physician–patient aesthetic and functional evaluation()
title_full_unstemmed Revision rhinoplasty: physician–patient aesthetic and functional evaluation()
title_short Revision rhinoplasty: physician–patient aesthetic and functional evaluation()
title_sort revision rhinoplasty: physician–patient aesthetic and functional evaluation()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29074124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.08.011
work_keys_str_mv AT vianheloisanardikoerner revisionrhinoplastyphysicianpatientaestheticandfunctionalevaluation
AT bergercezaraugustosarraff revisionrhinoplastyphysicianpatientaestheticandfunctionalevaluation
AT barradaniellecandia revisionrhinoplastyphysicianpatientaestheticandfunctionalevaluation
AT perinanapaula revisionrhinoplastyphysicianpatientaestheticandfunctionalevaluation