Cargando…

Integrating women’s voices in quality improvement for maternity care: A qualitative study

INTRODUCTION: Improving the quality of maternity care is high on the national agenda in the Netherlands. One aspect gaining significant attention is integrating women’s experiences – as users of maternity care – in this quality improvement. The aim of this study was to gain deeper insights into how...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cellissen, Evelien, Vogels-Broeke, Maaike, Korstjens, Irene, Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36119403
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/ejm/152253
_version_ 1784782941366255616
author Cellissen, Evelien
Vogels-Broeke, Maaike
Korstjens, Irene
Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne
author_facet Cellissen, Evelien
Vogels-Broeke, Maaike
Korstjens, Irene
Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne
author_sort Cellissen, Evelien
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Improving the quality of maternity care is high on the national agenda in the Netherlands. One aspect gaining significant attention is integrating women’s experiences – as users of maternity care – in this quality improvement. The aim of this study was to gain deeper insights into how maternity care professionals in Dutch Maternity Care Collaborations integrate women’s voices into quality improvement as part of integrated maternity care and what role midwives can have in this. METHODS: This was a descriptive qualitative study, using semi-structured individual interviews and content analysis for an in-depth exploration of maternity care professionals’ experiences and opinions on integrating women’s voices in quality improvement. Participants were twelve maternity care professionals involved in quality improvement activities from eight Dutch Maternity Care Collaborations. RESULTS: Four themes emerged: ‘Quality improvement based on women's voices is still in its infancy’ and was experienced as an important but challenging topic; ‘Collecting women's voices’ was conducted, but needed more facilitation; Using women's voices’ was hindered by a lack of expertise and a structured feedback and feedforward system; and ‘Ensuring listening to women's voices’ and integrating them in quality improvement required further facilitation. CONCLUSIONS: Care professionals emphasized that listening to women’s voices for quality improvement is important but challenging due to the lack of expertise, organizational structure, time, and financial resources. A feasible implementation strategy including concrete support is recommended by maternity care professionals to boost action.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9442975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher European Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94429752022-09-16 Integrating women’s voices in quality improvement for maternity care: A qualitative study Cellissen, Evelien Vogels-Broeke, Maaike Korstjens, Irene Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne Eur J Midwifery Research Paper INTRODUCTION: Improving the quality of maternity care is high on the national agenda in the Netherlands. One aspect gaining significant attention is integrating women’s experiences – as users of maternity care – in this quality improvement. The aim of this study was to gain deeper insights into how maternity care professionals in Dutch Maternity Care Collaborations integrate women’s voices into quality improvement as part of integrated maternity care and what role midwives can have in this. METHODS: This was a descriptive qualitative study, using semi-structured individual interviews and content analysis for an in-depth exploration of maternity care professionals’ experiences and opinions on integrating women’s voices in quality improvement. Participants were twelve maternity care professionals involved in quality improvement activities from eight Dutch Maternity Care Collaborations. RESULTS: Four themes emerged: ‘Quality improvement based on women's voices is still in its infancy’ and was experienced as an important but challenging topic; ‘Collecting women's voices’ was conducted, but needed more facilitation; Using women's voices’ was hindered by a lack of expertise and a structured feedback and feedforward system; and ‘Ensuring listening to women's voices’ and integrating them in quality improvement required further facilitation. CONCLUSIONS: Care professionals emphasized that listening to women’s voices for quality improvement is important but challenging due to the lack of expertise, organizational structure, time, and financial resources. A feasible implementation strategy including concrete support is recommended by maternity care professionals to boost action. European Publishing 2022-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9442975/ /pubmed/36119403 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/ejm/152253 Text en © 2022 Cellissen E. et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Cellissen, Evelien
Vogels-Broeke, Maaike
Korstjens, Irene
Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne
Integrating women’s voices in quality improvement for maternity care: A qualitative study
title Integrating women’s voices in quality improvement for maternity care: A qualitative study
title_full Integrating women’s voices in quality improvement for maternity care: A qualitative study
title_fullStr Integrating women’s voices in quality improvement for maternity care: A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Integrating women’s voices in quality improvement for maternity care: A qualitative study
title_short Integrating women’s voices in quality improvement for maternity care: A qualitative study
title_sort integrating women’s voices in quality improvement for maternity care: a qualitative study
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36119403
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/ejm/152253
work_keys_str_mv AT cellissenevelien integratingwomensvoicesinqualityimprovementformaternitycareaqualitativestudy
AT vogelsbroekemaaike integratingwomensvoicesinqualityimprovementformaternitycareaqualitativestudy
AT korstjensirene integratingwomensvoicesinqualityimprovementformaternitycareaqualitativestudy
AT nieuwenhuijzemarianne integratingwomensvoicesinqualityimprovementformaternitycareaqualitativestudy