Cargando…

Light-curing process for clear aligners’ attachment reproduction: comparison between two nanocomposites cured by the auxiliary of a new tool

BACKGROUND: Attachments’ configuration play an important role during Clear Aligner Treatment (CAT) for aligner retention and control of movements planned. The aims were to compare the macroscopic morphology of attachments reproduced with flowable (FNC) and conventional (CNC) composites and the effec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gazzani, Francesca, Bellisario, Denise, Quadrini, Fabrizio, Danesi, Carlotta, Alberti, Andrea, Cozza, Paola, Pavoni, Chiara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36064526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02407-8
_version_ 1784782944414466048
author Gazzani, Francesca
Bellisario, Denise
Quadrini, Fabrizio
Danesi, Carlotta
Alberti, Andrea
Cozza, Paola
Pavoni, Chiara
author_facet Gazzani, Francesca
Bellisario, Denise
Quadrini, Fabrizio
Danesi, Carlotta
Alberti, Andrea
Cozza, Paola
Pavoni, Chiara
author_sort Gazzani, Francesca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Attachments’ configuration play an important role during Clear Aligner Treatment (CAT) for aligner retention and control of movements planned. The aims were to compare the macroscopic morphology of attachments reproduced with flowable (FNC) and conventional (CNC) composites and the effects on them of two light-guide tips with different dimensions. METHODS: 4 resin casts derived from the initial scan of the same patient were obtained. 10 vestibular attachments were replaced on both upper and lower arches of each model with CNC (Models A, B) and FNC (Models C, D). Each composite was cured by means of the same LED lamp with both regular light-guide (Models A, B) and push and light tool® (Models C, D). The 80 attachments were qualitative analyzed by means of a digital stereo microscope. Surface roughness and waviness measurements were assessed by contact probe surface profiler (TalySurf CLI 2000; Taylor Hobson, Leicester, United Kingdom). Statistical analysis was performed with independent samples t-tests. Significance was established at the P < 0.05 level. RESULTS: Model A showed lower values of surface roughness (Ra − 1.41 µm, Rt − 3.46 µm) and waviness (Wa − 2.36 µm, Wt − 10.95 µm) when compared with Model C. Significant reduction of waviness (Wa − 3.85 µm, Wt − 4.90 µm) was observed on Model B when compared with Model D. Significant increase of roughness and waviness parameters (Ra 3.88 µm, Rt 21.07, Wa 2.89 µm, Wt 14.74 µm) was found when CNC sample (Model A) was cured with regular light-guide tip. Higher values (Ra 2.33 µm, Rt 24.07 µm, Wa 1.67 µm, Wt 20.79 µm) were observed after regular light-guide tips curing on FNC sample (Model C). CONCLUSIONS: CNC resins determine more regular surfaces of attachments profiles. The additional use of a smaller light- guide of the LED push and light tool® allows to improve the macroscopic morphology of the attachments and to maximize light irradiance delivering by enhancing the polymerization process and the integrity of the features during the treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9442987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94429872022-09-06 Light-curing process for clear aligners’ attachment reproduction: comparison between two nanocomposites cured by the auxiliary of a new tool Gazzani, Francesca Bellisario, Denise Quadrini, Fabrizio Danesi, Carlotta Alberti, Andrea Cozza, Paola Pavoni, Chiara BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: Attachments’ configuration play an important role during Clear Aligner Treatment (CAT) for aligner retention and control of movements planned. The aims were to compare the macroscopic morphology of attachments reproduced with flowable (FNC) and conventional (CNC) composites and the effects on them of two light-guide tips with different dimensions. METHODS: 4 resin casts derived from the initial scan of the same patient were obtained. 10 vestibular attachments were replaced on both upper and lower arches of each model with CNC (Models A, B) and FNC (Models C, D). Each composite was cured by means of the same LED lamp with both regular light-guide (Models A, B) and push and light tool® (Models C, D). The 80 attachments were qualitative analyzed by means of a digital stereo microscope. Surface roughness and waviness measurements were assessed by contact probe surface profiler (TalySurf CLI 2000; Taylor Hobson, Leicester, United Kingdom). Statistical analysis was performed with independent samples t-tests. Significance was established at the P < 0.05 level. RESULTS: Model A showed lower values of surface roughness (Ra − 1.41 µm, Rt − 3.46 µm) and waviness (Wa − 2.36 µm, Wt − 10.95 µm) when compared with Model C. Significant reduction of waviness (Wa − 3.85 µm, Wt − 4.90 µm) was observed on Model B when compared with Model D. Significant increase of roughness and waviness parameters (Ra 3.88 µm, Rt 21.07, Wa 2.89 µm, Wt 14.74 µm) was found when CNC sample (Model A) was cured with regular light-guide tip. Higher values (Ra 2.33 µm, Rt 24.07 µm, Wa 1.67 µm, Wt 20.79 µm) were observed after regular light-guide tips curing on FNC sample (Model C). CONCLUSIONS: CNC resins determine more regular surfaces of attachments profiles. The additional use of a smaller light- guide of the LED push and light tool® allows to improve the macroscopic morphology of the attachments and to maximize light irradiance delivering by enhancing the polymerization process and the integrity of the features during the treatment. BioMed Central 2022-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9442987/ /pubmed/36064526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02407-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gazzani, Francesca
Bellisario, Denise
Quadrini, Fabrizio
Danesi, Carlotta
Alberti, Andrea
Cozza, Paola
Pavoni, Chiara
Light-curing process for clear aligners’ attachment reproduction: comparison between two nanocomposites cured by the auxiliary of a new tool
title Light-curing process for clear aligners’ attachment reproduction: comparison between two nanocomposites cured by the auxiliary of a new tool
title_full Light-curing process for clear aligners’ attachment reproduction: comparison between two nanocomposites cured by the auxiliary of a new tool
title_fullStr Light-curing process for clear aligners’ attachment reproduction: comparison between two nanocomposites cured by the auxiliary of a new tool
title_full_unstemmed Light-curing process for clear aligners’ attachment reproduction: comparison between two nanocomposites cured by the auxiliary of a new tool
title_short Light-curing process for clear aligners’ attachment reproduction: comparison between two nanocomposites cured by the auxiliary of a new tool
title_sort light-curing process for clear aligners’ attachment reproduction: comparison between two nanocomposites cured by the auxiliary of a new tool
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9442987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36064526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02407-8
work_keys_str_mv AT gazzanifrancesca lightcuringprocessforclearalignersattachmentreproductioncomparisonbetweentwonanocompositescuredbytheauxiliaryofanewtool
AT bellisariodenise lightcuringprocessforclearalignersattachmentreproductioncomparisonbetweentwonanocompositescuredbytheauxiliaryofanewtool
AT quadrinifabrizio lightcuringprocessforclearalignersattachmentreproductioncomparisonbetweentwonanocompositescuredbytheauxiliaryofanewtool
AT danesicarlotta lightcuringprocessforclearalignersattachmentreproductioncomparisonbetweentwonanocompositescuredbytheauxiliaryofanewtool
AT albertiandrea lightcuringprocessforclearalignersattachmentreproductioncomparisonbetweentwonanocompositescuredbytheauxiliaryofanewtool
AT cozzapaola lightcuringprocessforclearalignersattachmentreproductioncomparisonbetweentwonanocompositescuredbytheauxiliaryofanewtool
AT pavonichiara lightcuringprocessforclearalignersattachmentreproductioncomparisonbetweentwonanocompositescuredbytheauxiliaryofanewtool