Cargando…

Vestibular evoked myogenic potential: new perspectives in multiple sclerosis

SUMMARY: Aim: To evaluate vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in patients with multiple sclerosis as method of diagnostic support. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We studied a group of normal individuals (n = 15) and a Studied group (n = 15) that comprised patients with diagnosis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aidar, Renata Chade, Suzuki, Fábio A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9443493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16446891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31284-2
_version_ 1784782995294519296
author Aidar, Renata Chade
Suzuki, Fábio A.
author_facet Aidar, Renata Chade
Suzuki, Fábio A.
author_sort Aidar, Renata Chade
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY: Aim: To evaluate vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in patients with multiple sclerosis as method of diagnostic support. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We studied a group of normal individuals (n = 15) and a Studied group (n = 15) that comprised patients with diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Both groups were submitted to vestibular evoked myogenic potential exam. In each ear it was applied 200 stimuli by clicks and repeated for 2 consecutive cycles with the purpose of evaluating reproducibility. The active electrode of surface was put on the superior S‡of sternocleidomastoid muscle and the reference electrode on the anterior border of the clavicle. The individuals were instructed to rotate theirs head to the opposite side to the stimulated ear. RESULTS: Vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses were prompt, reproducible and biphasic. The latency of wave P1 and N2 and P1-N2 amplitude showed a higher value in the studied group when compared with the normal group. There was no significant difference when the ears were compared in P1 and N2 amplitude. We noticed that individuals with multiple sclerosis showed no response in 30% of the cases. In evaluating the individuals of the Studied group with otoneurology symptoms and compared with individuals without symptoms, it was observed that P1 and N2 latencies and P1-N2 amplitude were higher in symptomatic cases. CONCLUSION: Vestibular evoked myogenic potential was considered a good method of diagnostic support of vestibulospinal tract in cases of multiple sclerosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9443493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94434932022-09-09 Vestibular evoked myogenic potential: new perspectives in multiple sclerosis Aidar, Renata Chade Suzuki, Fábio A. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article SUMMARY: Aim: To evaluate vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in patients with multiple sclerosis as method of diagnostic support. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We studied a group of normal individuals (n = 15) and a Studied group (n = 15) that comprised patients with diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Both groups were submitted to vestibular evoked myogenic potential exam. In each ear it was applied 200 stimuli by clicks and repeated for 2 consecutive cycles with the purpose of evaluating reproducibility. The active electrode of surface was put on the superior S‡of sternocleidomastoid muscle and the reference electrode on the anterior border of the clavicle. The individuals were instructed to rotate theirs head to the opposite side to the stimulated ear. RESULTS: Vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses were prompt, reproducible and biphasic. The latency of wave P1 and N2 and P1-N2 amplitude showed a higher value in the studied group when compared with the normal group. There was no significant difference when the ears were compared in P1 and N2 amplitude. We noticed that individuals with multiple sclerosis showed no response in 30% of the cases. In evaluating the individuals of the Studied group with otoneurology symptoms and compared with individuals without symptoms, it was observed that P1 and N2 latencies and P1-N2 amplitude were higher in symptomatic cases. CONCLUSION: Vestibular evoked myogenic potential was considered a good method of diagnostic support of vestibulospinal tract in cases of multiple sclerosis. Elsevier 2015-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9443493/ /pubmed/16446891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31284-2 Text en . https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Aidar, Renata Chade
Suzuki, Fábio A.
Vestibular evoked myogenic potential: new perspectives in multiple sclerosis
title Vestibular evoked myogenic potential: new perspectives in multiple sclerosis
title_full Vestibular evoked myogenic potential: new perspectives in multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr Vestibular evoked myogenic potential: new perspectives in multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Vestibular evoked myogenic potential: new perspectives in multiple sclerosis
title_short Vestibular evoked myogenic potential: new perspectives in multiple sclerosis
title_sort vestibular evoked myogenic potential: new perspectives in multiple sclerosis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9443493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16446891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31284-2
work_keys_str_mv AT aidarrenatachade vestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialnewperspectivesinmultiplesclerosis
AT suzukifabioa vestibularevokedmyogenicpotentialnewperspectivesinmultiplesclerosis