Cargando…
Is it important to restrict head movement after Epley maneuver?
The effectiveness of postmaneuver postural restrictions is controversial in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. AIM: To verify the role of postural restrictions in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo of posterior canal, submitted to a single Epley maneuver. STUDY DESIG...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9443566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16878246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31246-5 |
_version_ | 1784783012905353216 |
---|---|
author | Ganança, Fernando Freitas Simas, Ricardo Ganança, Maurício M. Korn, Gustavo P. Dorigueto, Ricardo S. |
author_facet | Ganança, Fernando Freitas Simas, Ricardo Ganança, Maurício M. Korn, Gustavo P. Dorigueto, Ricardo S. |
author_sort | Ganança, Fernando Freitas |
collection | PubMed |
description | The effectiveness of postmaneuver postural restrictions is controversial in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. AIM: To verify the role of postural restrictions in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo of posterior canal, submitted to a single Epley maneuver. STUDY DESIGN: clinical prospective. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Fifty eight patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo of posterior canal were randomly divided in two groups following the application of a unique Epley maneuver. The patients from group 1 were informed to restrict their head movements and to use a cervical collar and group 2 patients were not informed about these postmaneuver restrictions. The patients from both groups were reevaluated one week after Epley maneuver, regarding the presence of symptoms and positional nystagmus. RESULTS: One week after Epley maneuver 82.1% of the patients from group 1 and 73.3% from group 2 didn't present positional nystagmus (p = 0.421). There was a clinical improvement in 96.0% of the patients from group 1 and in 94.0% from group 2 (p = 0.781). CONCLUSION: The use of postural restrictions in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo of posterior canal didn't interfere in their clinical evaluation, one week after a unique Epley maneuver. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9443566 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94435662022-09-09 Is it important to restrict head movement after Epley maneuver? Ganança, Fernando Freitas Simas, Ricardo Ganança, Maurício M. Korn, Gustavo P. Dorigueto, Ricardo S. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article The effectiveness of postmaneuver postural restrictions is controversial in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. AIM: To verify the role of postural restrictions in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo of posterior canal, submitted to a single Epley maneuver. STUDY DESIGN: clinical prospective. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Fifty eight patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo of posterior canal were randomly divided in two groups following the application of a unique Epley maneuver. The patients from group 1 were informed to restrict their head movements and to use a cervical collar and group 2 patients were not informed about these postmaneuver restrictions. The patients from both groups were reevaluated one week after Epley maneuver, regarding the presence of symptoms and positional nystagmus. RESULTS: One week after Epley maneuver 82.1% of the patients from group 1 and 73.3% from group 2 didn't present positional nystagmus (p = 0.421). There was a clinical improvement in 96.0% of the patients from group 1 and in 94.0% from group 2 (p = 0.781). CONCLUSION: The use of postural restrictions in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo of posterior canal didn't interfere in their clinical evaluation, one week after a unique Epley maneuver. Elsevier 2015-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9443566/ /pubmed/16878246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31246-5 Text en . https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ganança, Fernando Freitas Simas, Ricardo Ganança, Maurício M. Korn, Gustavo P. Dorigueto, Ricardo S. Is it important to restrict head movement after Epley maneuver? |
title | Is it important to restrict head movement after Epley maneuver? |
title_full | Is it important to restrict head movement after Epley maneuver? |
title_fullStr | Is it important to restrict head movement after Epley maneuver? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is it important to restrict head movement after Epley maneuver? |
title_short | Is it important to restrict head movement after Epley maneuver? |
title_sort | is it important to restrict head movement after epley maneuver? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9443566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16878246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31246-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ganancafernandofreitas isitimportanttorestrictheadmovementafterepleymaneuver AT simasricardo isitimportanttorestrictheadmovementafterepleymaneuver AT ganancamauriciom isitimportanttorestrictheadmovementafterepleymaneuver AT korngustavop isitimportanttorestrictheadmovementafterepleymaneuver AT doriguetoricardos isitimportanttorestrictheadmovementafterepleymaneuver |