Cargando…

Neonatal Hearing Screening: failures, hearing loss and risk indicators

ABSTRACT: To check the rate of failure, hearing loss and its association with demographic variables and risk indicators for hearing loss in newborns submitted to the Newborn Hearing Screening in a secondary hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional and retrospective study, involving 1,570 new...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Onoda, Raquel Mari, de Azevedo, Marisa Frasson, Nunes dos Santos, Amélia Miyashiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9443756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22183285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942011000600015
_version_ 1784783058060181504
author Onoda, Raquel Mari
de Azevedo, Marisa Frasson
Nunes dos Santos, Amélia Miyashiro
author_facet Onoda, Raquel Mari
de Azevedo, Marisa Frasson
Nunes dos Santos, Amélia Miyashiro
author_sort Onoda, Raquel Mari
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: To check the rate of failure, hearing loss and its association with demographic variables and risk indicators for hearing loss in newborns submitted to the Newborn Hearing Screening in a secondary hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional and retrospective study, involving 1,570 newborns submitted to the different stages of the Newborn Hearing Screening Program. Initially, we carried out otoacoustic emission tests (ILO Echocheck) and the cochlear-eyelid reflex. Afterwards, we analyzed the demographic and clinical characteristics of the newborns, screening rate of failure, hearing loss and its association with demographic variables and risk indicators. RESULTS: Twenty-six newborns had failures in the first stages of the Program (1.7%), who were then referred to diagnostic evaluation. Of these, 16 (61.5%) did not come, two (7.7%) had normal results and eight (30.8%) were diagnosed with hearing disorders. The screening failure rate was 1.7% and the frequency of hearing disorders was 0.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-term newborns of very low birth weights had higher rates of screening failures and a greater occurrence of hearing changes. The factors associated with screening failure and hearing changes were similar to the ones described in the literature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9443756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94437562022-09-09 Neonatal Hearing Screening: failures, hearing loss and risk indicators Onoda, Raquel Mari de Azevedo, Marisa Frasson Nunes dos Santos, Amélia Miyashiro Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article ABSTRACT: To check the rate of failure, hearing loss and its association with demographic variables and risk indicators for hearing loss in newborns submitted to the Newborn Hearing Screening in a secondary hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional and retrospective study, involving 1,570 newborns submitted to the different stages of the Newborn Hearing Screening Program. Initially, we carried out otoacoustic emission tests (ILO Echocheck) and the cochlear-eyelid reflex. Afterwards, we analyzed the demographic and clinical characteristics of the newborns, screening rate of failure, hearing loss and its association with demographic variables and risk indicators. RESULTS: Twenty-six newborns had failures in the first stages of the Program (1.7%), who were then referred to diagnostic evaluation. Of these, 16 (61.5%) did not come, two (7.7%) had normal results and eight (30.8%) were diagnosed with hearing disorders. The screening failure rate was 1.7% and the frequency of hearing disorders was 0.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-term newborns of very low birth weights had higher rates of screening failures and a greater occurrence of hearing changes. The factors associated with screening failure and hearing changes were similar to the ones described in the literature. Elsevier 2015-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9443756/ /pubmed/22183285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942011000600015 Text en . https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Onoda, Raquel Mari
de Azevedo, Marisa Frasson
Nunes dos Santos, Amélia Miyashiro
Neonatal Hearing Screening: failures, hearing loss and risk indicators
title Neonatal Hearing Screening: failures, hearing loss and risk indicators
title_full Neonatal Hearing Screening: failures, hearing loss and risk indicators
title_fullStr Neonatal Hearing Screening: failures, hearing loss and risk indicators
title_full_unstemmed Neonatal Hearing Screening: failures, hearing loss and risk indicators
title_short Neonatal Hearing Screening: failures, hearing loss and risk indicators
title_sort neonatal hearing screening: failures, hearing loss and risk indicators
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9443756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22183285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942011000600015
work_keys_str_mv AT onodaraquelmari neonatalhearingscreeningfailureshearinglossandriskindicators
AT deazevedomarisafrasson neonatalhearingscreeningfailureshearinglossandriskindicators
AT nunesdossantosameliamiyashiro neonatalhearingscreeningfailureshearinglossandriskindicators