Cargando…
Neonatal Hearing Screening: failures, hearing loss and risk indicators
ABSTRACT: To check the rate of failure, hearing loss and its association with demographic variables and risk indicators for hearing loss in newborns submitted to the Newborn Hearing Screening in a secondary hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional and retrospective study, involving 1,570 new...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9443756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22183285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942011000600015 |
_version_ | 1784783058060181504 |
---|---|
author | Onoda, Raquel Mari de Azevedo, Marisa Frasson Nunes dos Santos, Amélia Miyashiro |
author_facet | Onoda, Raquel Mari de Azevedo, Marisa Frasson Nunes dos Santos, Amélia Miyashiro |
author_sort | Onoda, Raquel Mari |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: To check the rate of failure, hearing loss and its association with demographic variables and risk indicators for hearing loss in newborns submitted to the Newborn Hearing Screening in a secondary hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional and retrospective study, involving 1,570 newborns submitted to the different stages of the Newborn Hearing Screening Program. Initially, we carried out otoacoustic emission tests (ILO Echocheck) and the cochlear-eyelid reflex. Afterwards, we analyzed the demographic and clinical characteristics of the newborns, screening rate of failure, hearing loss and its association with demographic variables and risk indicators. RESULTS: Twenty-six newborns had failures in the first stages of the Program (1.7%), who were then referred to diagnostic evaluation. Of these, 16 (61.5%) did not come, two (7.7%) had normal results and eight (30.8%) were diagnosed with hearing disorders. The screening failure rate was 1.7% and the frequency of hearing disorders was 0.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-term newborns of very low birth weights had higher rates of screening failures and a greater occurrence of hearing changes. The factors associated with screening failure and hearing changes were similar to the ones described in the literature. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9443756 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94437562022-09-09 Neonatal Hearing Screening: failures, hearing loss and risk indicators Onoda, Raquel Mari de Azevedo, Marisa Frasson Nunes dos Santos, Amélia Miyashiro Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article ABSTRACT: To check the rate of failure, hearing loss and its association with demographic variables and risk indicators for hearing loss in newborns submitted to the Newborn Hearing Screening in a secondary hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional and retrospective study, involving 1,570 newborns submitted to the different stages of the Newborn Hearing Screening Program. Initially, we carried out otoacoustic emission tests (ILO Echocheck) and the cochlear-eyelid reflex. Afterwards, we analyzed the demographic and clinical characteristics of the newborns, screening rate of failure, hearing loss and its association with demographic variables and risk indicators. RESULTS: Twenty-six newborns had failures in the first stages of the Program (1.7%), who were then referred to diagnostic evaluation. Of these, 16 (61.5%) did not come, two (7.7%) had normal results and eight (30.8%) were diagnosed with hearing disorders. The screening failure rate was 1.7% and the frequency of hearing disorders was 0.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-term newborns of very low birth weights had higher rates of screening failures and a greater occurrence of hearing changes. The factors associated with screening failure and hearing changes were similar to the ones described in the literature. Elsevier 2015-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9443756/ /pubmed/22183285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942011000600015 Text en . https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Onoda, Raquel Mari de Azevedo, Marisa Frasson Nunes dos Santos, Amélia Miyashiro Neonatal Hearing Screening: failures, hearing loss and risk indicators |
title | Neonatal Hearing Screening: failures, hearing loss and risk indicators |
title_full | Neonatal Hearing Screening: failures, hearing loss and risk indicators |
title_fullStr | Neonatal Hearing Screening: failures, hearing loss and risk indicators |
title_full_unstemmed | Neonatal Hearing Screening: failures, hearing loss and risk indicators |
title_short | Neonatal Hearing Screening: failures, hearing loss and risk indicators |
title_sort | neonatal hearing screening: failures, hearing loss and risk indicators |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9443756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22183285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942011000600015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT onodaraquelmari neonatalhearingscreeningfailureshearinglossandriskindicators AT deazevedomarisafrasson neonatalhearingscreeningfailureshearinglossandriskindicators AT nunesdossantosameliamiyashiro neonatalhearingscreeningfailureshearinglossandriskindicators |