Cargando…

Microbiology of Middle Meatus in Chronic Rhinosinusitis

This was a prospective study which assessed endoscopically collected middle meatus secretions in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and compared those findings with microbiological data of healthy individuals. METHODS: Middle meatus samples were collected from 134 CRS patients. In the labora...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Araujo, Elisabeth, Dall, Celso, Cantarelli, Vladmir, Pereira, Alexandre, Mariante, Afonso Ravanello
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9443770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17923927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30108-7
_version_ 1784783061554036736
author Araujo, Elisabeth
Dall, Celso
Cantarelli, Vladmir
Pereira, Alexandre
Mariante, Afonso Ravanello
author_facet Araujo, Elisabeth
Dall, Celso
Cantarelli, Vladmir
Pereira, Alexandre
Mariante, Afonso Ravanello
author_sort Araujo, Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description This was a prospective study which assessed endoscopically collected middle meatus secretions in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and compared those findings with microbiological data of healthy individuals. METHODS: Middle meatus samples were collected from 134 CRS patients. In the laboratory, samples were Gram stained for microscopic examination with white blood cels (WBCs) count and also send for aerobic, anaerobic and fungal cultures. Fifty volunteers served as control. RESULTS: In CRS patients a total of 220 microorganisms were isolated. The most frequent microorganisms were Staphylococcus aureus (31%), coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS) (23%). Gram-negative or facultative microorganisms were isolated in 37% of the samples, anaerobes in 12% and fungi in 14%. Seventy four percent of the samples with positive cultures presented many or few WBC. In the control group, 76% of cultures were positive for aerobes and 12% for fungi. No anaerobes were isolated. There were rare or no WBC in the fifty samples. The most frequent microorganisms were CNS (40%), Staphylococcus aureus (18%). CONCLUSION: The microbiology of the middle meatus is similar in CRS patients and healthy individuals. Despite this, there was an important difference between the WBC count in these two groups, which helps to distinguish an infective from a saprophitic microorganism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9443770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94437702022-09-09 Microbiology of Middle Meatus in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Araujo, Elisabeth Dall, Celso Cantarelli, Vladmir Pereira, Alexandre Mariante, Afonso Ravanello Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article This was a prospective study which assessed endoscopically collected middle meatus secretions in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and compared those findings with microbiological data of healthy individuals. METHODS: Middle meatus samples were collected from 134 CRS patients. In the laboratory, samples were Gram stained for microscopic examination with white blood cels (WBCs) count and also send for aerobic, anaerobic and fungal cultures. Fifty volunteers served as control. RESULTS: In CRS patients a total of 220 microorganisms were isolated. The most frequent microorganisms were Staphylococcus aureus (31%), coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS) (23%). Gram-negative or facultative microorganisms were isolated in 37% of the samples, anaerobes in 12% and fungi in 14%. Seventy four percent of the samples with positive cultures presented many or few WBC. In the control group, 76% of cultures were positive for aerobes and 12% for fungi. No anaerobes were isolated. There were rare or no WBC in the fifty samples. The most frequent microorganisms were CNS (40%), Staphylococcus aureus (18%). CONCLUSION: The microbiology of the middle meatus is similar in CRS patients and healthy individuals. Despite this, there was an important difference between the WBC count in these two groups, which helps to distinguish an infective from a saprophitic microorganism. Elsevier 2015-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9443770/ /pubmed/17923927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30108-7 Text en . https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Araujo, Elisabeth
Dall, Celso
Cantarelli, Vladmir
Pereira, Alexandre
Mariante, Afonso Ravanello
Microbiology of Middle Meatus in Chronic Rhinosinusitis
title Microbiology of Middle Meatus in Chronic Rhinosinusitis
title_full Microbiology of Middle Meatus in Chronic Rhinosinusitis
title_fullStr Microbiology of Middle Meatus in Chronic Rhinosinusitis
title_full_unstemmed Microbiology of Middle Meatus in Chronic Rhinosinusitis
title_short Microbiology of Middle Meatus in Chronic Rhinosinusitis
title_sort microbiology of middle meatus in chronic rhinosinusitis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9443770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17923927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30108-7
work_keys_str_mv AT araujoelisabeth microbiologyofmiddlemeatusinchronicrhinosinusitis
AT dallcelso microbiologyofmiddlemeatusinchronicrhinosinusitis
AT cantarellivladmir microbiologyofmiddlemeatusinchronicrhinosinusitis
AT pereiraalexandre microbiologyofmiddlemeatusinchronicrhinosinusitis
AT marianteafonsoravanello microbiologyofmiddlemeatusinchronicrhinosinusitis