Cargando…
Post-lingual deafness: benefits of cochlear implants vs. conventional hearing aids
The technological advances in cochlear implants and processing strategies have enabled subjects affected by severe to profound hearing loss to hear sounds and recognize speech in various different degrees. The variability of hearing outcomes in subjects with post-lingual deafness has been significan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9443817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22499380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942012000200019 |
_version_ | 1784783073040138240 |
---|---|
author | Bittencourt, Aline Gomes Ikari, Liliane Satomi Torre, Ana Adelina Giantomassi Della Bento, Ricardo Ferreira Tsuji, Robinson Koji de Brito Neto, Rubens Vuono |
author_facet | Bittencourt, Aline Gomes Ikari, Liliane Satomi Torre, Ana Adelina Giantomassi Della Bento, Ricardo Ferreira Tsuji, Robinson Koji de Brito Neto, Rubens Vuono |
author_sort | Bittencourt, Aline Gomes |
collection | PubMed |
description | The technological advances in cochlear implants and processing strategies have enabled subjects affected by severe to profound hearing loss to hear sounds and recognize speech in various different degrees. The variability of hearing outcomes in subjects with post-lingual deafness has been significant and cochlear implant indications have been extended to include an ever larger population. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to look into the groups of post-lingual deafness patients to find where cochlear implants have yielded better outcomes than conventional hearing aids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review the literature available on databases SciELO, Cochrane, MEDLINE, and LILACS-BIREME. The publications selected for review were rated as A or B on evidence strength on the day of the review. Their authors analyzed and compared hearing aids and cochlear implants in populations of post-lingually deaf patients. Study Design: Systematic review. RESULTS: Eleven out of the 2,169 papers searched were found to be pertinent to the topic and were rated B for evidence strength. Six studies were prospective cohort trials, four were cross-sectional studies and one was a clinical trial. CONCLUSION: The assessment done on the benefits yielded by post-lingually deaf subjects from cochlear implants showed that they are effective and provide for better results than conventional hearing aids. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9443817 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94438172022-09-09 Post-lingual deafness: benefits of cochlear implants vs. conventional hearing aids Bittencourt, Aline Gomes Ikari, Liliane Satomi Torre, Ana Adelina Giantomassi Della Bento, Ricardo Ferreira Tsuji, Robinson Koji de Brito Neto, Rubens Vuono Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Review Article The technological advances in cochlear implants and processing strategies have enabled subjects affected by severe to profound hearing loss to hear sounds and recognize speech in various different degrees. The variability of hearing outcomes in subjects with post-lingual deafness has been significant and cochlear implant indications have been extended to include an ever larger population. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to look into the groups of post-lingual deafness patients to find where cochlear implants have yielded better outcomes than conventional hearing aids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review the literature available on databases SciELO, Cochrane, MEDLINE, and LILACS-BIREME. The publications selected for review were rated as A or B on evidence strength on the day of the review. Their authors analyzed and compared hearing aids and cochlear implants in populations of post-lingually deaf patients. Study Design: Systematic review. RESULTS: Eleven out of the 2,169 papers searched were found to be pertinent to the topic and were rated B for evidence strength. Six studies were prospective cohort trials, four were cross-sectional studies and one was a clinical trial. CONCLUSION: The assessment done on the benefits yielded by post-lingually deaf subjects from cochlear implants showed that they are effective and provide for better results than conventional hearing aids. Elsevier 2015-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9443817/ /pubmed/22499380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942012000200019 Text en . https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Bittencourt, Aline Gomes Ikari, Liliane Satomi Torre, Ana Adelina Giantomassi Della Bento, Ricardo Ferreira Tsuji, Robinson Koji de Brito Neto, Rubens Vuono Post-lingual deafness: benefits of cochlear implants vs. conventional hearing aids |
title | Post-lingual deafness: benefits of cochlear implants vs. conventional hearing aids |
title_full | Post-lingual deafness: benefits of cochlear implants vs. conventional hearing aids |
title_fullStr | Post-lingual deafness: benefits of cochlear implants vs. conventional hearing aids |
title_full_unstemmed | Post-lingual deafness: benefits of cochlear implants vs. conventional hearing aids |
title_short | Post-lingual deafness: benefits of cochlear implants vs. conventional hearing aids |
title_sort | post-lingual deafness: benefits of cochlear implants vs. conventional hearing aids |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9443817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22499380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942012000200019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bittencourtalinegomes postlingualdeafnessbenefitsofcochlearimplantsvsconventionalhearingaids AT ikarililianesatomi postlingualdeafnessbenefitsofcochlearimplantsvsconventionalhearingaids AT torreanaadelinagiantomassidella postlingualdeafnessbenefitsofcochlearimplantsvsconventionalhearingaids AT bentoricardoferreira postlingualdeafnessbenefitsofcochlearimplantsvsconventionalhearingaids AT tsujirobinsonkoji postlingualdeafnessbenefitsofcochlearimplantsvsconventionalhearingaids AT debritonetorubensvuono postlingualdeafnessbenefitsofcochlearimplantsvsconventionalhearingaids |