Cargando…

Hearing aids and recovery times: a study according to cognitive status

Studies have shown that elderly people with cognitive impairments benefit more from hearing aids with slower recovery times. OBJECTIVE: To study participation constraints and speech recognition in noise of elderly subjects equipped with hearing aids of different recovery times according to cognitive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghiringhelli, Rosângela, Martinelli Iorio, Maria Cecilia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9443837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23670323
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20130032
_version_ 1784783077957959680
author Ghiringhelli, Rosângela
Martinelli Iorio, Maria Cecilia
author_facet Ghiringhelli, Rosângela
Martinelli Iorio, Maria Cecilia
author_sort Ghiringhelli, Rosângela
collection PubMed
description Studies have shown that elderly people with cognitive impairments benefit more from hearing aids with slower recovery times. OBJECTIVE: To study participation constraints and speech recognition in noise of elderly subjects equipped with hearing aids of different recovery times according to cognitive impairment status. METHOD: Fifty subjects aged between 60 and 80 years were followed for four months. They were divided at first in groups of individuals without (G1; n = 24) and with (G2; n = 26) cognitive impairment based on results of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Sub-scale test. Half the members of each group received hearing aids with faster recovery times and half got slower recovery aids, thus forming four groups: two without cognitive impairment (faster recovery - G1F; slower recovery - G1S) and two suspected for cognitive impairment (faster recovery - G2F; slower recovery - G2S). All subjects were interviewed, submitted to basic audiological assessment, asked to answer the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly questionnaire, and tested for speech recognition in noise. ANOVA, McNemar's test, and the Chi-square test were applied. The significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: There was significant improvement in participation constraint and speech recognition in noise with hearing aids alone. Sub-group G2F needed more favorable signal-to-noise ratios to recognize 50% of the speech in noise. CONCLUSION: Participation constraint and speech recognition in noise were improved regardless of recovery times or cognitive impairment status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9443837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94438372022-09-09 Hearing aids and recovery times: a study according to cognitive status Ghiringhelli, Rosângela Martinelli Iorio, Maria Cecilia Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article Studies have shown that elderly people with cognitive impairments benefit more from hearing aids with slower recovery times. OBJECTIVE: To study participation constraints and speech recognition in noise of elderly subjects equipped with hearing aids of different recovery times according to cognitive impairment status. METHOD: Fifty subjects aged between 60 and 80 years were followed for four months. They were divided at first in groups of individuals without (G1; n = 24) and with (G2; n = 26) cognitive impairment based on results of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Sub-scale test. Half the members of each group received hearing aids with faster recovery times and half got slower recovery aids, thus forming four groups: two without cognitive impairment (faster recovery - G1F; slower recovery - G1S) and two suspected for cognitive impairment (faster recovery - G2F; slower recovery - G2S). All subjects were interviewed, submitted to basic audiological assessment, asked to answer the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly questionnaire, and tested for speech recognition in noise. ANOVA, McNemar's test, and the Chi-square test were applied. The significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: There was significant improvement in participation constraint and speech recognition in noise with hearing aids alone. Sub-group G2F needed more favorable signal-to-noise ratios to recognize 50% of the speech in noise. CONCLUSION: Participation constraint and speech recognition in noise were improved regardless of recovery times or cognitive impairment status. Elsevier 2015-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9443837/ /pubmed/23670323 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20130032 Text en . https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Ghiringhelli, Rosângela
Martinelli Iorio, Maria Cecilia
Hearing aids and recovery times: a study according to cognitive status
title Hearing aids and recovery times: a study according to cognitive status
title_full Hearing aids and recovery times: a study according to cognitive status
title_fullStr Hearing aids and recovery times: a study according to cognitive status
title_full_unstemmed Hearing aids and recovery times: a study according to cognitive status
title_short Hearing aids and recovery times: a study according to cognitive status
title_sort hearing aids and recovery times: a study according to cognitive status
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9443837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23670323
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20130032
work_keys_str_mv AT ghiringhellirosangela hearingaidsandrecoverytimesastudyaccordingtocognitivestatus
AT martinelliioriomariacecilia hearingaidsandrecoverytimesastudyaccordingtocognitivestatus