Cargando…

Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects

INTRODUCTION: Auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) are an important tool to detect objectively frequency-specific hearing thresholds. Pure-tone audiometry is the gold-standard for hearing evaluation, although sometimes it may be inconclusive, especially in children and uncooperative adults. AIM: C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Oliveira Beck, Roberto Miquelino, Ramos, Bernardo Faria, Grasel, Signe Schuster, Ramos, Henrique Faria, de Moraes, Maria Flávia Bonadia B., de Almeida, Edigar Rezende, Bento, Ricardo Ferreira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9443973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24626890
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20140009
_version_ 1784783111060455424
author de Oliveira Beck, Roberto Miquelino
Ramos, Bernardo Faria
Grasel, Signe Schuster
Ramos, Henrique Faria
de Moraes, Maria Flávia Bonadia B.
de Almeida, Edigar Rezende
Bento, Ricardo Ferreira
author_facet de Oliveira Beck, Roberto Miquelino
Ramos, Bernardo Faria
Grasel, Signe Schuster
Ramos, Henrique Faria
de Moraes, Maria Flávia Bonadia B.
de Almeida, Edigar Rezende
Bento, Ricardo Ferreira
author_sort de Oliveira Beck, Roberto Miquelino
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) are an important tool to detect objectively frequency-specific hearing thresholds. Pure-tone audiometry is the gold-standard for hearing evaluation, although sometimes it may be inconclusive, especially in children and uncooperative adults. AIM: Compare pure tone thresholds (PT) with ASSR thresholds in normal hearing subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cross-sectional study we included 26 adults (n = 52 ears) of both genders, without any hearing complaints or otologic diseases and normal pure-tone thresholds. All subjects had clinical history, otomicroscopy, audiometry and immitance measurements. This evaluation was followed by the ASSR test. The mean pure-tone and ASSR thresholds for each frequency were calculated. RESULTS: The mean difference between PT and ASSR thresholdswas 7,12 for 500 Hz, 7,6 for 1000 Hz, 8,27 for 2000 Hz and 9,71 dB for 4000 Hz. There were no difference between PT and ASSR means at either frequency. CONCLUSION: ASSR thresholds were comparable to pure-tone thresholds in normal hearing adults. Nevertheless it should not be used as the only method of hearing evaluation. © 2014 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9443973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94439732022-09-09 Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects de Oliveira Beck, Roberto Miquelino Ramos, Bernardo Faria Grasel, Signe Schuster Ramos, Henrique Faria de Moraes, Maria Flávia Bonadia B. de Almeida, Edigar Rezende Bento, Ricardo Ferreira Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original article INTRODUCTION: Auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) are an important tool to detect objectively frequency-specific hearing thresholds. Pure-tone audiometry is the gold-standard for hearing evaluation, although sometimes it may be inconclusive, especially in children and uncooperative adults. AIM: Compare pure tone thresholds (PT) with ASSR thresholds in normal hearing subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cross-sectional study we included 26 adults (n = 52 ears) of both genders, without any hearing complaints or otologic diseases and normal pure-tone thresholds. All subjects had clinical history, otomicroscopy, audiometry and immitance measurements. This evaluation was followed by the ASSR test. The mean pure-tone and ASSR thresholds for each frequency were calculated. RESULTS: The mean difference between PT and ASSR thresholdswas 7,12 for 500 Hz, 7,6 for 1000 Hz, 8,27 for 2000 Hz and 9,71 dB for 4000 Hz. There were no difference between PT and ASSR means at either frequency. CONCLUSION: ASSR thresholds were comparable to pure-tone thresholds in normal hearing adults. Nevertheless it should not be used as the only method of hearing evaluation. © 2014 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved. Elsevier 2014-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9443973/ /pubmed/24626890 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20140009 Text en © 2014 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Original article
de Oliveira Beck, Roberto Miquelino
Ramos, Bernardo Faria
Grasel, Signe Schuster
Ramos, Henrique Faria
de Moraes, Maria Flávia Bonadia B.
de Almeida, Edigar Rezende
Bento, Ricardo Ferreira
Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects
title Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects
title_full Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects
title_fullStr Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects
title_short Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects
title_sort comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects
topic Original article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9443973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24626890
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20140009
work_keys_str_mv AT deoliveirabeckrobertomiquelino comparativestudybetweenpuretoneaudiometryandauditorysteadystateresponsesinnormalhearingsubjects
AT ramosbernardofaria comparativestudybetweenpuretoneaudiometryandauditorysteadystateresponsesinnormalhearingsubjects
AT graselsigneschuster comparativestudybetweenpuretoneaudiometryandauditorysteadystateresponsesinnormalhearingsubjects
AT ramoshenriquefaria comparativestudybetweenpuretoneaudiometryandauditorysteadystateresponsesinnormalhearingsubjects
AT demoraesmariaflaviabonadiab comparativestudybetweenpuretoneaudiometryandauditorysteadystateresponsesinnormalhearingsubjects
AT dealmeidaedigarrezende comparativestudybetweenpuretoneaudiometryandauditorysteadystateresponsesinnormalhearingsubjects
AT bentoricardoferreira comparativestudybetweenpuretoneaudiometryandauditorysteadystateresponsesinnormalhearingsubjects