Cargando…
Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects
INTRODUCTION: Auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) are an important tool to detect objectively frequency-specific hearing thresholds. Pure-tone audiometry is the gold-standard for hearing evaluation, although sometimes it may be inconclusive, especially in children and uncooperative adults. AIM: C...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9443973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24626890 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20140009 |
_version_ | 1784783111060455424 |
---|---|
author | de Oliveira Beck, Roberto Miquelino Ramos, Bernardo Faria Grasel, Signe Schuster Ramos, Henrique Faria de Moraes, Maria Flávia Bonadia B. de Almeida, Edigar Rezende Bento, Ricardo Ferreira |
author_facet | de Oliveira Beck, Roberto Miquelino Ramos, Bernardo Faria Grasel, Signe Schuster Ramos, Henrique Faria de Moraes, Maria Flávia Bonadia B. de Almeida, Edigar Rezende Bento, Ricardo Ferreira |
author_sort | de Oliveira Beck, Roberto Miquelino |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) are an important tool to detect objectively frequency-specific hearing thresholds. Pure-tone audiometry is the gold-standard for hearing evaluation, although sometimes it may be inconclusive, especially in children and uncooperative adults. AIM: Compare pure tone thresholds (PT) with ASSR thresholds in normal hearing subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cross-sectional study we included 26 adults (n = 52 ears) of both genders, without any hearing complaints or otologic diseases and normal pure-tone thresholds. All subjects had clinical history, otomicroscopy, audiometry and immitance measurements. This evaluation was followed by the ASSR test. The mean pure-tone and ASSR thresholds for each frequency were calculated. RESULTS: The mean difference between PT and ASSR thresholdswas 7,12 for 500 Hz, 7,6 for 1000 Hz, 8,27 for 2000 Hz and 9,71 dB for 4000 Hz. There were no difference between PT and ASSR means at either frequency. CONCLUSION: ASSR thresholds were comparable to pure-tone thresholds in normal hearing adults. Nevertheless it should not be used as the only method of hearing evaluation. © 2014 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9443973 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94439732022-09-09 Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects de Oliveira Beck, Roberto Miquelino Ramos, Bernardo Faria Grasel, Signe Schuster Ramos, Henrique Faria de Moraes, Maria Flávia Bonadia B. de Almeida, Edigar Rezende Bento, Ricardo Ferreira Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original article INTRODUCTION: Auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) are an important tool to detect objectively frequency-specific hearing thresholds. Pure-tone audiometry is the gold-standard for hearing evaluation, although sometimes it may be inconclusive, especially in children and uncooperative adults. AIM: Compare pure tone thresholds (PT) with ASSR thresholds in normal hearing subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cross-sectional study we included 26 adults (n = 52 ears) of both genders, without any hearing complaints or otologic diseases and normal pure-tone thresholds. All subjects had clinical history, otomicroscopy, audiometry and immitance measurements. This evaluation was followed by the ASSR test. The mean pure-tone and ASSR thresholds for each frequency were calculated. RESULTS: The mean difference between PT and ASSR thresholdswas 7,12 for 500 Hz, 7,6 for 1000 Hz, 8,27 for 2000 Hz and 9,71 dB for 4000 Hz. There were no difference between PT and ASSR means at either frequency. CONCLUSION: ASSR thresholds were comparable to pure-tone thresholds in normal hearing adults. Nevertheless it should not be used as the only method of hearing evaluation. © 2014 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved. Elsevier 2014-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9443973/ /pubmed/24626890 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20140009 Text en © 2014 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original article de Oliveira Beck, Roberto Miquelino Ramos, Bernardo Faria Grasel, Signe Schuster Ramos, Henrique Faria de Moraes, Maria Flávia Bonadia B. de Almeida, Edigar Rezende Bento, Ricardo Ferreira Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects |
title | Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects |
title_full | Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects |
title_fullStr | Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects |
title_short | Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects |
title_sort | comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects |
topic | Original article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9443973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24626890 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20140009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deoliveirabeckrobertomiquelino comparativestudybetweenpuretoneaudiometryandauditorysteadystateresponsesinnormalhearingsubjects AT ramosbernardofaria comparativestudybetweenpuretoneaudiometryandauditorysteadystateresponsesinnormalhearingsubjects AT graselsigneschuster comparativestudybetweenpuretoneaudiometryandauditorysteadystateresponsesinnormalhearingsubjects AT ramoshenriquefaria comparativestudybetweenpuretoneaudiometryandauditorysteadystateresponsesinnormalhearingsubjects AT demoraesmariaflaviabonadiab comparativestudybetweenpuretoneaudiometryandauditorysteadystateresponsesinnormalhearingsubjects AT dealmeidaedigarrezende comparativestudybetweenpuretoneaudiometryandauditorysteadystateresponsesinnormalhearingsubjects AT bentoricardoferreira comparativestudybetweenpuretoneaudiometryandauditorysteadystateresponsesinnormalhearingsubjects |