Cargando…

Evaluation of Common Nasal Cannulas in Neonatal Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) Using a Novel Neonatal Nasal Model

PURPOSE: Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) may reduce intubation rates and be especially beneficial in the care of preterm infants, in addition to other care modalities. Currently, ventilators do not display the pressure at the nares but the pressure in the ventilator tubing system. There are several n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borg, Ulf, Aviano, Jeffrey, Ginani, Milan, Li, Kun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36072575
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S374418
_version_ 1784783172567826432
author Borg, Ulf
Aviano, Jeffrey
Ginani, Milan
Li, Kun
author_facet Borg, Ulf
Aviano, Jeffrey
Ginani, Milan
Li, Kun
author_sort Borg, Ulf
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) may reduce intubation rates and be especially beneficial in the care of preterm infants, in addition to other care modalities. Currently, ventilators do not display the pressure at the nares but the pressure in the ventilator tubing system. There are several nasal cannulas available for use to deliver NIV. The purpose of this study was to compare the inspiratory pressure on the ventilator to the measured pressure delivered at the nares using three cannula brands (Manufacturer A, Fisher & Paykel; Manufacturer B, Neotech RAM; and Manufacturer C, Hudson RCI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This bench study utilized a 3D printed nasal model, including nares in multiple sizes to accommodate all nasal prongs studied. The nasal adaptors were connected to neonatal test lungs, to simulate patient breathing. Multiple sizes of nasal cannulas from the three manufacturers were tested for inspiratory vs delivered pressure at the patient side of the cannula, using eight combinations of ventilator settings. Each nasal cannula was tested on six Puritan Bennett™ 980 ventilators. RESULTS: The measured delivered pressure at the nares was consistently lower than the clinician-set inspiratory pressure. Across all ventilator settings, 7 of the 11 cannulas delivered significantly less pressure at the nares compared to the inspiratory ventilator pressure (p < 0.01). For each cannula, as inspiratory pressure increased, the difference between delivered and inspiratory pressures also increased. The cannula from Manufacturer B consistently demonstrated the greatest differences between set inspiratory and delivered pressures for each ventilator setting. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated substantial differences between ventilator inspiratory pressure and measured delivered pressure, which may have clinical significance. Being unaware of the actual airway pressure delivered to the patient may lead to erroneous adjustments to the level of ventilator pressure, which may be especially consequential to those with delicate and developing respiratory systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9444233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94442332022-09-06 Evaluation of Common Nasal Cannulas in Neonatal Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) Using a Novel Neonatal Nasal Model Borg, Ulf Aviano, Jeffrey Ginani, Milan Li, Kun Med Devices (Auckl) Original Research PURPOSE: Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) may reduce intubation rates and be especially beneficial in the care of preterm infants, in addition to other care modalities. Currently, ventilators do not display the pressure at the nares but the pressure in the ventilator tubing system. There are several nasal cannulas available for use to deliver NIV. The purpose of this study was to compare the inspiratory pressure on the ventilator to the measured pressure delivered at the nares using three cannula brands (Manufacturer A, Fisher & Paykel; Manufacturer B, Neotech RAM; and Manufacturer C, Hudson RCI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This bench study utilized a 3D printed nasal model, including nares in multiple sizes to accommodate all nasal prongs studied. The nasal adaptors were connected to neonatal test lungs, to simulate patient breathing. Multiple sizes of nasal cannulas from the three manufacturers were tested for inspiratory vs delivered pressure at the patient side of the cannula, using eight combinations of ventilator settings. Each nasal cannula was tested on six Puritan Bennett™ 980 ventilators. RESULTS: The measured delivered pressure at the nares was consistently lower than the clinician-set inspiratory pressure. Across all ventilator settings, 7 of the 11 cannulas delivered significantly less pressure at the nares compared to the inspiratory ventilator pressure (p < 0.01). For each cannula, as inspiratory pressure increased, the difference between delivered and inspiratory pressures also increased. The cannula from Manufacturer B consistently demonstrated the greatest differences between set inspiratory and delivered pressures for each ventilator setting. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated substantial differences between ventilator inspiratory pressure and measured delivered pressure, which may have clinical significance. Being unaware of the actual airway pressure delivered to the patient may lead to erroneous adjustments to the level of ventilator pressure, which may be especially consequential to those with delicate and developing respiratory systems. Dove 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9444233/ /pubmed/36072575 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S374418 Text en © 2022 Borg et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Borg, Ulf
Aviano, Jeffrey
Ginani, Milan
Li, Kun
Evaluation of Common Nasal Cannulas in Neonatal Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) Using a Novel Neonatal Nasal Model
title Evaluation of Common Nasal Cannulas in Neonatal Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) Using a Novel Neonatal Nasal Model
title_full Evaluation of Common Nasal Cannulas in Neonatal Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) Using a Novel Neonatal Nasal Model
title_fullStr Evaluation of Common Nasal Cannulas in Neonatal Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) Using a Novel Neonatal Nasal Model
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Common Nasal Cannulas in Neonatal Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) Using a Novel Neonatal Nasal Model
title_short Evaluation of Common Nasal Cannulas in Neonatal Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) Using a Novel Neonatal Nasal Model
title_sort evaluation of common nasal cannulas in neonatal noninvasive ventilation (niv) using a novel neonatal nasal model
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36072575
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S374418
work_keys_str_mv AT borgulf evaluationofcommonnasalcannulasinneonatalnoninvasiveventilationnivusinganovelneonatalnasalmodel
AT avianojeffrey evaluationofcommonnasalcannulasinneonatalnoninvasiveventilationnivusinganovelneonatalnasalmodel
AT ginanimilan evaluationofcommonnasalcannulasinneonatalnoninvasiveventilationnivusinganovelneonatalnasalmodel
AT likun evaluationofcommonnasalcannulasinneonatalnoninvasiveventilationnivusinganovelneonatalnasalmodel