Cargando…

Artificial selection methods from evolutionary computing show promise for directed evolution of microbes

Directed microbial evolution harnesses evolutionary processes in the laboratory to construct microorganisms with enhanced or novel functional traits. Attempting to direct evolutionary processes for applied goals is fundamental to evolutionary computation, which harnesses the principles of Darwinian...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lalejini, Alexander, Dolson, Emily, Vostinar, Anya E, Zaman, Luis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35916365
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79665
_version_ 1784783174256033792
author Lalejini, Alexander
Dolson, Emily
Vostinar, Anya E
Zaman, Luis
author_facet Lalejini, Alexander
Dolson, Emily
Vostinar, Anya E
Zaman, Luis
author_sort Lalejini, Alexander
collection PubMed
description Directed microbial evolution harnesses evolutionary processes in the laboratory to construct microorganisms with enhanced or novel functional traits. Attempting to direct evolutionary processes for applied goals is fundamental to evolutionary computation, which harnesses the principles of Darwinian evolution as a general-purpose search engine for solutions to challenging computational problems. Despite their overlapping approaches, artificial selection methods from evolutionary computing are not commonly applied to living systems in the laboratory. In this work, we ask whether parent selection algorithms—procedures for choosing promising progenitors—from evolutionary computation might be useful for directing the evolution of microbial populations when selecting for multiple functional traits. To do so, we introduce an agent-based model of directed microbial evolution, which we used to evaluate how well three selection algorithms from evolutionary computing (tournament selection, lexicase selection, and non-dominated elite selection) performed relative to methods commonly used in the laboratory (elite and top 10% selection). We found that multiobjective selection techniques from evolutionary computing (lexicase and non-dominated elite) generally outperformed the commonly used directed evolution approaches when selecting for multiple traits of interest. Our results motivate ongoing work transferring these multiobjective selection procedures into the laboratory and a continued evaluation of more sophisticated artificial selection methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9444240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94442402022-09-06 Artificial selection methods from evolutionary computing show promise for directed evolution of microbes Lalejini, Alexander Dolson, Emily Vostinar, Anya E Zaman, Luis eLife Computational and Systems Biology Directed microbial evolution harnesses evolutionary processes in the laboratory to construct microorganisms with enhanced or novel functional traits. Attempting to direct evolutionary processes for applied goals is fundamental to evolutionary computation, which harnesses the principles of Darwinian evolution as a general-purpose search engine for solutions to challenging computational problems. Despite their overlapping approaches, artificial selection methods from evolutionary computing are not commonly applied to living systems in the laboratory. In this work, we ask whether parent selection algorithms—procedures for choosing promising progenitors—from evolutionary computation might be useful for directing the evolution of microbial populations when selecting for multiple functional traits. To do so, we introduce an agent-based model of directed microbial evolution, which we used to evaluate how well three selection algorithms from evolutionary computing (tournament selection, lexicase selection, and non-dominated elite selection) performed relative to methods commonly used in the laboratory (elite and top 10% selection). We found that multiobjective selection techniques from evolutionary computing (lexicase and non-dominated elite) generally outperformed the commonly used directed evolution approaches when selecting for multiple traits of interest. Our results motivate ongoing work transferring these multiobjective selection procedures into the laboratory and a continued evaluation of more sophisticated artificial selection methods. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9444240/ /pubmed/35916365 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79665 Text en © 2022, Lalejini et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Computational and Systems Biology
Lalejini, Alexander
Dolson, Emily
Vostinar, Anya E
Zaman, Luis
Artificial selection methods from evolutionary computing show promise for directed evolution of microbes
title Artificial selection methods from evolutionary computing show promise for directed evolution of microbes
title_full Artificial selection methods from evolutionary computing show promise for directed evolution of microbes
title_fullStr Artificial selection methods from evolutionary computing show promise for directed evolution of microbes
title_full_unstemmed Artificial selection methods from evolutionary computing show promise for directed evolution of microbes
title_short Artificial selection methods from evolutionary computing show promise for directed evolution of microbes
title_sort artificial selection methods from evolutionary computing show promise for directed evolution of microbes
topic Computational and Systems Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35916365
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79665
work_keys_str_mv AT lalejinialexander artificialselectionmethodsfromevolutionarycomputingshowpromisefordirectedevolutionofmicrobes
AT dolsonemily artificialselectionmethodsfromevolutionarycomputingshowpromisefordirectedevolutionofmicrobes
AT vostinaranyae artificialselectionmethodsfromevolutionarycomputingshowpromisefordirectedevolutionofmicrobes
AT zamanluis artificialselectionmethodsfromevolutionarycomputingshowpromisefordirectedevolutionofmicrobes