Cargando…

The score after 10 years of registration of systematic review protocols

BACKGROUND: With the exponential growth of published systematic reviews (SR), there is a high potential for overlapping and redundant duplication of work. Prospective protocol registration gives the opportunity to assess the added value of a new study or review, thereby potentially reducing research...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	van der Braak, Kim, Ghannad, Mona, Orelio, Claudia, Heus, Pauline, Damen, Johanna A. A., Spijker, René, Robinson, Karen, Lund, Hans, Hooft, Lotty
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2022
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36064610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02053-9

Ejemplares similares

Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: Systematic Review of De-Implementation Studies
por: Orelio, Claudia C., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

What did we learn in 35 years of research on nutrition and supplements for age‐related macular degeneration: a systematic review
por: Pameijer, Els M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Damen, Johanna A., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The increasing need for systematic reviews of prognosis studies: strategies to facilitate review production and improve quality of primary research
por: Damen, Johanna A. A. G., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The methodological quality of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018 reveals a positive trend but also an urgent need for improvement
por: Vinkers, Christiaan H., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Infrequent and incomplete registration of test accuracy studies: analysis of recent study reports
por: Korevaar, Daniël A, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Poor reporting of multivariable prediction model studies: towards a targeted implementation strategy of the TRIPOD statement
por: Heus, Pauline, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Uniformity in measuring adherence to reporting guidelines: the example of TRIPOD for assessing completeness of reporting of prediction model studies
por: Heus, Pauline, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Evidence for pharmacological interventions to reduce cardiovascular risk for patients with chronic kidney disease: a study protocol of an evidence map
por: Colombijn, Julia M. T., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Trial Registration Numbers Are Underreported in Biomedical Publications
por: van de Wetering, Fleur T., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Reducing low-value care: what can we learn from eight de-implementation studies in the Netherlands?
por: Verkerk, Eva W, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effectiveness of contact tracing apps for SARS-CoV-2: a rapid systematic review
por: Jenniskens, Kevin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Barriers and facilitators to reduce low-value care: a qualitative evidence synthesis
por: van Dulmen, SA, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

How to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic model studies
por: Damen, Johanna A.A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Clinical trial registration was associated with lower risk of bias compared with non-registered trials among trials included in systematic reviews
por: Lindsley, Kristina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Decision aids to help older people make health decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: van Weert, Julia C. M., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Introducing PALETTE: an iterative method for conducting a literature search for a review in palliative care
por: Zwakman, Marieke, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Assessing the Well-Being at Work of Nurses and Doctors in Hospitals: Protocol for a Scoping Review of Monitoring Instruments
por: Boskma, Amber, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Search filters to identify geriatric medicine in Medline
por: van de Glind, Esther M M, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

What are Effective Strategies to Reduce Low-Value Care? An Analysis of 121 Randomized Deimplementation Studies
por: Heus, Pauline, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review
por: Damen, Johanna A A G, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

From registration to publication: A study on Dutch academic randomized controlled trials
por: Huiskens, Joost, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

High accuracy, fiducial marker-based image registration of correlative microscopy images
por: Mohammadian, Sajjad, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes
por: Debray, Thomas PA, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

TRIPOD statement: a preliminary pre-post analysis of reporting and methods of prediction models
por: Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Amir H, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Empirical evidence of the impact of study characteristics on the performance of prediction models: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Damen, Johanna A A G, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID‐19
por: Struyf, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Expression analysis of the TAB2 protein in adult mouse tissues
por: Orelio, C., et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID‐19 disease
por: Struyf, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)
por: Snell, Kym I E, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Structural and thermodynamic signatures that define pseudotriloop RNA hairpins
por: van der Werf, Ramon, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques
por: Andaur Navarro, Constanza L, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review
por: Andaur Navarro, Constanza L, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
por: Andaur Navarro, Constanza L., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Identification of Additional Trials in Prospective Trial Registers for Cochrane Systematic Reviews
por: van Enst, Wynanda A., et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review
por: Dhiman, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
por: Dhiman, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved
por: Dhiman, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement
por: Peters, Jeroen P. M., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Assessment of the Quality of Reporting of Randomised Controlled Trials in Otorhinolaryngologic Literature – Adherence to the CONSORT Statement
por: Peters, Jeroen P. M., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_5p8l2hgh60ntlpjravsboje7ti