Cargando…

Viral RNA Load in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic COVID-19 Omicron Variant-Positive Patients

OBJECTIVES: Viral load is important when evaluating viral transmission potential, involving the use of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycle threshold (Ct) value. We aimed to analyze the PCR Ct values of respiratory tract samples taken from patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Qian, Shi, Lixia, Li, Haomin, Huang, Shuping, Li, Hongwei, Li, Li, Han, Jin, Wu, Qi, Pei, Zhengcun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36072643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5460400
_version_ 1784783221599240192
author Wu, Qian
Shi, Lixia
Li, Haomin
Huang, Shuping
Li, Hongwei
Li, Li
Han, Jin
Wu, Qi
Pei, Zhengcun
author_facet Wu, Qian
Shi, Lixia
Li, Haomin
Huang, Shuping
Li, Hongwei
Li, Li
Han, Jin
Wu, Qi
Pei, Zhengcun
author_sort Wu, Qian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Viral load is important when evaluating viral transmission potential, involving the use of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycle threshold (Ct) value. We aimed to analyze the PCR Ct values of respiratory tract samples taken from patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant strains to evaluate these strains' viral dynamics. METHODS: This study comprised 361 patients. The Ct values of SARS-CoV-2-related respiratory samples were compared between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. RESULTS: The median (25(th) percentile and 75(th) percentile) nasopharynx and oropharynx SARS-CoV-2 Ct values were 30.5 (24.5–35.0) and 34.5 (30.0–37.0) in the symptomatic group, respectively, and 27.8 (23.4–34.5) and 33.5 (26.0–35.0) in the asymptomatic group, respectively, without significance. In the symptomatic group, subgroup analyses according to age showed the mean nasal Ct value for patients aged >18 years was 29.0 (23.5–34.5), which was significantly lower than that of patients aged 0–4 years and 5–13 years (36.0 (30.5–38.0) and 34.5 (31.0–39.0), respectively). The nasal Ct value for asymptomatic patients aged >18 years was 25.5 (20.9–28.4), which was significantly lower than of patients aged 5–13 years (34.5 (25.6–36.4)). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the viral loads of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients did not differ significantly. However, adults infected with SARS-CoV-2 had higher nasal viral loads that those of young children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9444452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94444522022-09-06 Viral RNA Load in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic COVID-19 Omicron Variant-Positive Patients Wu, Qian Shi, Lixia Li, Haomin Huang, Shuping Li, Hongwei Li, Li Han, Jin Wu, Qi Pei, Zhengcun Can Respir J Research Article OBJECTIVES: Viral load is important when evaluating viral transmission potential, involving the use of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) cycle threshold (Ct) value. We aimed to analyze the PCR Ct values of respiratory tract samples taken from patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant strains to evaluate these strains' viral dynamics. METHODS: This study comprised 361 patients. The Ct values of SARS-CoV-2-related respiratory samples were compared between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. RESULTS: The median (25(th) percentile and 75(th) percentile) nasopharynx and oropharynx SARS-CoV-2 Ct values were 30.5 (24.5–35.0) and 34.5 (30.0–37.0) in the symptomatic group, respectively, and 27.8 (23.4–34.5) and 33.5 (26.0–35.0) in the asymptomatic group, respectively, without significance. In the symptomatic group, subgroup analyses according to age showed the mean nasal Ct value for patients aged >18 years was 29.0 (23.5–34.5), which was significantly lower than that of patients aged 0–4 years and 5–13 years (36.0 (30.5–38.0) and 34.5 (31.0–39.0), respectively). The nasal Ct value for asymptomatic patients aged >18 years was 25.5 (20.9–28.4), which was significantly lower than of patients aged 5–13 years (34.5 (25.6–36.4)). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the viral loads of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients did not differ significantly. However, adults infected with SARS-CoV-2 had higher nasal viral loads that those of young children. Hindawi 2022-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9444452/ /pubmed/36072643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5460400 Text en Copyright © 2022 Qian Wu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wu, Qian
Shi, Lixia
Li, Haomin
Huang, Shuping
Li, Hongwei
Li, Li
Han, Jin
Wu, Qi
Pei, Zhengcun
Viral RNA Load in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic COVID-19 Omicron Variant-Positive Patients
title Viral RNA Load in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic COVID-19 Omicron Variant-Positive Patients
title_full Viral RNA Load in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic COVID-19 Omicron Variant-Positive Patients
title_fullStr Viral RNA Load in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic COVID-19 Omicron Variant-Positive Patients
title_full_unstemmed Viral RNA Load in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic COVID-19 Omicron Variant-Positive Patients
title_short Viral RNA Load in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic COVID-19 Omicron Variant-Positive Patients
title_sort viral rna load in symptomatic and asymptomatic covid-19 omicron variant-positive patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36072643
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5460400
work_keys_str_mv AT wuqian viralrnaloadinsymptomaticandasymptomaticcovid19omicronvariantpositivepatients
AT shilixia viralrnaloadinsymptomaticandasymptomaticcovid19omicronvariantpositivepatients
AT lihaomin viralrnaloadinsymptomaticandasymptomaticcovid19omicronvariantpositivepatients
AT huangshuping viralrnaloadinsymptomaticandasymptomaticcovid19omicronvariantpositivepatients
AT lihongwei viralrnaloadinsymptomaticandasymptomaticcovid19omicronvariantpositivepatients
AT lili viralrnaloadinsymptomaticandasymptomaticcovid19omicronvariantpositivepatients
AT hanjin viralrnaloadinsymptomaticandasymptomaticcovid19omicronvariantpositivepatients
AT wuqi viralrnaloadinsymptomaticandasymptomaticcovid19omicronvariantpositivepatients
AT peizhengcun viralrnaloadinsymptomaticandasymptomaticcovid19omicronvariantpositivepatients