Cargando…

Comparison of accuracy between digital and conventional implant impressions: two and three dimensional evaluations

PURPOSE: The present study compared the accuracy between digital and conventional implant impressions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The experimental models were divided into six groups depending on the implant location and the scanning span. Digital impressions were captured using the intraoral optical sc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Bi, Chuang, Wang, Xingyu, Tian, Fangfang, Qu, Zhe, Zhao, Jiaming
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2022
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105881 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.4.236

Ejemplares similares

Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Impression versus Conventional Method: Effect of Implant Angulation and Connection Type
por: Alikhasi, Marzieh, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral digital impression system and conventional impression techniques for multiple implants in the full-arch edentulous mandible
por: Farhan, Firas-Abdulameer, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Accuracy of digital impressions versus conventional impressions for 2 implants: an in vitro study evaluating the effect of implant angulation
por: Abduo, Jaafar, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Accuracy of Implant Casts Generated with Conventional and Digital Impressions—An In Vitro Study
por: Ribeiro, Paulo, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Three-dimensional accuracy of different impression techniques for dental implants
por: Nakhaei, Mohammadreza, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

In vitro comparison of the accuracy of four intraoral scanners and three conventional impression methods for two neighboring implants
por: Roig, Elena, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

In Vitro Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Impressions for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses
por: D’haese, Rani, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Evaluation of the accuracy of digital and conventional implant-level impression techniques for maxillofacial prosthesis
por: Baghani, Mohammad Taghi, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Impressions for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses: An In Vitro Study
por: Drancourt, Noemie, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of 3D accuracy of three different digital intraoral scanners in full-arch implant impressions
por: Akkal, Ozcan, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Full-Arch Impressions in Patients: An Update
por: Schmidt, Alexander, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

In vitro accuracy of digital and conventional impressions in the partially edentulous maxilla
por: Waldecker, Moritz, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

In Vivo Complete-Arch Implant Digital Impressions: Comparison of the Precision of Three Optical Impression Systems
por: Orejas-Perez, Jaime, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Accuracy of Digital Dental Implants Impression Taking with Intraoral Scanners Compared with Conventional Impression Techniques: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies
por: Albanchez-González, María Isabel, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Do digital impressions have a greater accuracy for full-arch implant-supported reconstructions compared to conventional impressions? An in vitro study
por: Shaikh, Mohsin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Accuracy of digital and conventional dental implant impressions for fixed partial dentures: A comparative clinical study
por: Gedrimiene, Agne, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comparison of the accuracy of different impression procedures in case of multiple and angulated implants: Accuracy of impressions in multiple and angulated implants
por: Richi, M. Wafa, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of the Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Printed Casts, Digital, and Conventional Casts: An In Vitro Study
por: Aly, Passent, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Accuracy of Digital Impressions and Fitness of Single Crowns Based on Digital Impressions
por: Yang, Xin, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Dimensional accuracy of vinyl polyether and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials in direct implant impression technique for multiple dental implants
por: Rajendran, Rohini, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking Using Intraoral Scanner versus the Conventional Technique
por: Zarbakhsh, Arash, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Effect of inter-dental abutment distance on the impression accuracy of digital and conventional methods
por: Shalileh, Shouka, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy between Open-Tray and Closed-Tray Implant Impression Technique in 15° Angled Implants
por: Balouch, F, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Effect of Storage Time of Extended-Pour and Conventional Alginate Impressions on Dimensional Accuracy of Casts
por: Rohanian, Ahmad, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Effect of impression coping and implant angulation on the accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro study
por: Jo, Si-Hoon, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Methods of Obtaining Full-Arch Dental Impression (In Vitro Study)
por: Husein, Hassan A, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Accuracy of tooth‐implant impressions: Comparison of five different techniques
por: Fathi, Amirhossein, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Effect of different impression materials and techniques on the dimensional accuracy of implant definitive casts
por: Ebadian, Behnaz, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparative Analysis of Three Different Impression Techniques for Impression Defects and Dimensional Accuracy Using a Digital Intraoral Scanner for Fixed Partial Dentures: An In Vivo Study
por: Khatuja, Neha G, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of digital and silicone impressions for single-tooth implants and two- and three-unit implants for a free-end edentulous saddle
por: Nagata, Koudai, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Accuracy of an intraoral digital impression: A review
por: Aswani, Kanchan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of the accuracy of fixture-level implant impressions using two different materials for splinting
por: Negahdari, Ramin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of intraoral scanning and conventional impression techniques using 3-dimensional superimposition
por: Rhee, Ye-Kyu, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparison of Digital and Conventional Impression Methods by Preclinical Students: Efficiency and Future Expectations
por: Bilir, Halenur, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparative evaluation of the effect of impression materials and trays on the accuracy of angulated implants impressions
por: Siadat, Hakimeh, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The impact of impression coping geometrical design on accuracy of implant impressions: an experimental study
por: Osman, Motaz, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The dimensional accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using two different impression techniques: An in vitro study
por: Kumari, Nirmala, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Conventional and Digital Impressions for Fabrication of Complete Implant-Supported Bars: A Comparative In Vitro Study
por: Vieira, Samanta N. V., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of the accuracy of open-tray and snap-on impression techniques of implants with different angulations
por: Tafti, Abbass Fallah, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comparison of the Accuracy of Fixture-Level Implant Impression Making with Different Splinting Techniques
por: Nateghi, Mehrdad, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_50huihpo5ee4b20j6r4nkh1usv