Cargando…

Impact of early elective tracheotomy in critically ill patients()

INTRODUCTION: Tracheotomy is one of the most frequent surgical procedures performed in critically ill patients hospitalized at intensive care units. The ideal timing for a tracheotomy is still controversial, despite decades of experience. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of performing early trache...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Correia, Isabel Araújo Marques, Sousa, Vítor, Pinto, Luis Marques, Barros, Ezequiel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25303819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.07.008
_version_ 1784783261798498304
author Correia, Isabel Araújo Marques
Sousa, Vítor
Pinto, Luis Marques
Barros, Ezequiel
author_facet Correia, Isabel Araújo Marques
Sousa, Vítor
Pinto, Luis Marques
Barros, Ezequiel
author_sort Correia, Isabel Araújo Marques
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Tracheotomy is one of the most frequent surgical procedures performed in critically ill patients hospitalized at intensive care units. The ideal timing for a tracheotomy is still controversial, despite decades of experience. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of performing early tracheotomies in critically ill patients on duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, overall hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. METHODS: Retrospective and observational study of cases subjected to elective tracheotomy at one of the intensive care units of this hospital during five consecutive years. The patients were stratified into two groups: early tracheotomy group (tracheotomy performed from day one up to and including day seven of mechanical ventilation) and late tracheotomy group (tracheotomy performed after day seven). The outcomes of the groups were compared. RESULTS: In the early tracheotomy group, there was a statistically significant reduction in duration of mechanical ventilation (6 days vs. 19 days; p < 0.001), duration of intensive care unit stay (10 days vs. 28 days; p = 0.001), and incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (1 case vs. 44 cases; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Early tracheotomy has a significant positive impact on critically ill patients hospitalized at this intensive care unit. These results support the tendency to balance the risk-benefit analysis in favor of early tracheotomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9444593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94445932022-09-09 Impact of early elective tracheotomy in critically ill patients() Correia, Isabel Araújo Marques Sousa, Vítor Pinto, Luis Marques Barros, Ezequiel Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Tracheotomy is one of the most frequent surgical procedures performed in critically ill patients hospitalized at intensive care units. The ideal timing for a tracheotomy is still controversial, despite decades of experience. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of performing early tracheotomies in critically ill patients on duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, overall hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. METHODS: Retrospective and observational study of cases subjected to elective tracheotomy at one of the intensive care units of this hospital during five consecutive years. The patients were stratified into two groups: early tracheotomy group (tracheotomy performed from day one up to and including day seven of mechanical ventilation) and late tracheotomy group (tracheotomy performed after day seven). The outcomes of the groups were compared. RESULTS: In the early tracheotomy group, there was a statistically significant reduction in duration of mechanical ventilation (6 days vs. 19 days; p < 0.001), duration of intensive care unit stay (10 days vs. 28 days; p = 0.001), and incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (1 case vs. 44 cases; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Early tracheotomy has a significant positive impact on critically ill patients hospitalized at this intensive care unit. These results support the tendency to balance the risk-benefit analysis in favor of early tracheotomy. Elsevier 2014-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9444593/ /pubmed/25303819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.07.008 Text en © 2014 Associac¸ão Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Correia, Isabel Araújo Marques
Sousa, Vítor
Pinto, Luis Marques
Barros, Ezequiel
Impact of early elective tracheotomy in critically ill patients()
title Impact of early elective tracheotomy in critically ill patients()
title_full Impact of early elective tracheotomy in critically ill patients()
title_fullStr Impact of early elective tracheotomy in critically ill patients()
title_full_unstemmed Impact of early elective tracheotomy in critically ill patients()
title_short Impact of early elective tracheotomy in critically ill patients()
title_sort impact of early elective tracheotomy in critically ill patients()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25303819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.07.008
work_keys_str_mv AT correiaisabelaraujomarques impactofearlyelectivetracheotomyincriticallyillpatients
AT sousavitor impactofearlyelectivetracheotomyincriticallyillpatients
AT pintoluismarques impactofearlyelectivetracheotomyincriticallyillpatients
AT barrosezequiel impactofearlyelectivetracheotomyincriticallyillpatients