Cargando…

Lack of protection against gentamicin ototoxicity by auditory conditioning with noise()()

INTRODUCTION: Auditory conditioning consists of the pre-exposure to low levels of a potential harmful agent to protect against a subsequent harmful exposure. OBJECTIVE: To confirm if conditioning with an agent different from that used to cause the trauma can also be effective. METHODS: This was an e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strose, Alex, Hyppolito, Miguel Ângelo, Colombari, Gleice Cristina, Rossato, Maria, de Oliveira, Jose Antônio Aparecido
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25303813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.07.009
_version_ 1784783268108828672
author Strose, Alex
Hyppolito, Miguel Ângelo
Colombari, Gleice Cristina
Rossato, Maria
de Oliveira, Jose Antônio Aparecido
author_facet Strose, Alex
Hyppolito, Miguel Ângelo
Colombari, Gleice Cristina
Rossato, Maria
de Oliveira, Jose Antônio Aparecido
author_sort Strose, Alex
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Auditory conditioning consists of the pre-exposure to low levels of a potential harmful agent to protect against a subsequent harmful exposure. OBJECTIVE: To confirm if conditioning with an agent different from that used to cause the trauma can also be effective. METHODS: This was an experimental study with 17 guinea pigs, divided into three groups: an ototoxic control group (Cont) that received intramuscular administration of gentamicin 160 mg/kg/day for ten consecutive days, but no sound exposure; a sound control group (Sound) that was exposed to 85 dB broadband noise centered at 4 kHz, 30 min each day for ten consecutive days, but received no ototoxic medications; and an experimental group (Expt) that received sound exposure identical to the Sound group and after each noise presentation, received gentamicin similarly to Cont group. The animals were evaluated by distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs), and scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: The animals that were conditioned with noise did not show any protective effect compared with the ones that received only the ototoxic gentamicin administration. This lack of protection was observed functionally and morphologically. CONCLUSION: Conditioning with 85 dB broadband noises, 30 min a day for ten consecutive days does not protect against an ototoxic gentamicin administration of 160 mg/kg/day for ten consecutive days in the guinea pig.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9444619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94446192022-09-09 Lack of protection against gentamicin ototoxicity by auditory conditioning with noise()() Strose, Alex Hyppolito, Miguel Ângelo Colombari, Gleice Cristina Rossato, Maria de Oliveira, Jose Antônio Aparecido Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Auditory conditioning consists of the pre-exposure to low levels of a potential harmful agent to protect against a subsequent harmful exposure. OBJECTIVE: To confirm if conditioning with an agent different from that used to cause the trauma can also be effective. METHODS: This was an experimental study with 17 guinea pigs, divided into three groups: an ototoxic control group (Cont) that received intramuscular administration of gentamicin 160 mg/kg/day for ten consecutive days, but no sound exposure; a sound control group (Sound) that was exposed to 85 dB broadband noise centered at 4 kHz, 30 min each day for ten consecutive days, but received no ototoxic medications; and an experimental group (Expt) that received sound exposure identical to the Sound group and after each noise presentation, received gentamicin similarly to Cont group. The animals were evaluated by distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs), and scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: The animals that were conditioned with noise did not show any protective effect compared with the ones that received only the ototoxic gentamicin administration. This lack of protection was observed functionally and morphologically. CONCLUSION: Conditioning with 85 dB broadband noises, 30 min a day for ten consecutive days does not protect against an ototoxic gentamicin administration of 160 mg/kg/day for ten consecutive days in the guinea pig. Elsevier 2014-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9444619/ /pubmed/25303813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.07.009 Text en © 2014 Associac¸ão Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Strose, Alex
Hyppolito, Miguel Ângelo
Colombari, Gleice Cristina
Rossato, Maria
de Oliveira, Jose Antônio Aparecido
Lack of protection against gentamicin ototoxicity by auditory conditioning with noise()()
title Lack of protection against gentamicin ototoxicity by auditory conditioning with noise()()
title_full Lack of protection against gentamicin ototoxicity by auditory conditioning with noise()()
title_fullStr Lack of protection against gentamicin ototoxicity by auditory conditioning with noise()()
title_full_unstemmed Lack of protection against gentamicin ototoxicity by auditory conditioning with noise()()
title_short Lack of protection against gentamicin ototoxicity by auditory conditioning with noise()()
title_sort lack of protection against gentamicin ototoxicity by auditory conditioning with noise()()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25303813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.07.009
work_keys_str_mv AT strosealex lackofprotectionagainstgentamicinototoxicitybyauditoryconditioningwithnoise
AT hyppolitomiguelangelo lackofprotectionagainstgentamicinototoxicitybyauditoryconditioningwithnoise
AT colombarigleicecristina lackofprotectionagainstgentamicinototoxicitybyauditoryconditioningwithnoise
AT rossatomaria lackofprotectionagainstgentamicinototoxicitybyauditoryconditioningwithnoise
AT deoliveirajoseantonioaparecido lackofprotectionagainstgentamicinototoxicitybyauditoryconditioningwithnoise