Cargando…
Lack of protection against gentamicin ototoxicity by auditory conditioning with noise()()
INTRODUCTION: Auditory conditioning consists of the pre-exposure to low levels of a potential harmful agent to protect against a subsequent harmful exposure. OBJECTIVE: To confirm if conditioning with an agent different from that used to cause the trauma can also be effective. METHODS: This was an e...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25303813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.07.009 |
_version_ | 1784783268108828672 |
---|---|
author | Strose, Alex Hyppolito, Miguel Ângelo Colombari, Gleice Cristina Rossato, Maria de Oliveira, Jose Antônio Aparecido |
author_facet | Strose, Alex Hyppolito, Miguel Ângelo Colombari, Gleice Cristina Rossato, Maria de Oliveira, Jose Antônio Aparecido |
author_sort | Strose, Alex |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Auditory conditioning consists of the pre-exposure to low levels of a potential harmful agent to protect against a subsequent harmful exposure. OBJECTIVE: To confirm if conditioning with an agent different from that used to cause the trauma can also be effective. METHODS: This was an experimental study with 17 guinea pigs, divided into three groups: an ototoxic control group (Cont) that received intramuscular administration of gentamicin 160 mg/kg/day for ten consecutive days, but no sound exposure; a sound control group (Sound) that was exposed to 85 dB broadband noise centered at 4 kHz, 30 min each day for ten consecutive days, but received no ototoxic medications; and an experimental group (Expt) that received sound exposure identical to the Sound group and after each noise presentation, received gentamicin similarly to Cont group. The animals were evaluated by distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs), and scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: The animals that were conditioned with noise did not show any protective effect compared with the ones that received only the ototoxic gentamicin administration. This lack of protection was observed functionally and morphologically. CONCLUSION: Conditioning with 85 dB broadband noises, 30 min a day for ten consecutive days does not protect against an ototoxic gentamicin administration of 160 mg/kg/day for ten consecutive days in the guinea pig. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9444619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94446192022-09-09 Lack of protection against gentamicin ototoxicity by auditory conditioning with noise()() Strose, Alex Hyppolito, Miguel Ângelo Colombari, Gleice Cristina Rossato, Maria de Oliveira, Jose Antônio Aparecido Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Auditory conditioning consists of the pre-exposure to low levels of a potential harmful agent to protect against a subsequent harmful exposure. OBJECTIVE: To confirm if conditioning with an agent different from that used to cause the trauma can also be effective. METHODS: This was an experimental study with 17 guinea pigs, divided into three groups: an ototoxic control group (Cont) that received intramuscular administration of gentamicin 160 mg/kg/day for ten consecutive days, but no sound exposure; a sound control group (Sound) that was exposed to 85 dB broadband noise centered at 4 kHz, 30 min each day for ten consecutive days, but received no ototoxic medications; and an experimental group (Expt) that received sound exposure identical to the Sound group and after each noise presentation, received gentamicin similarly to Cont group. The animals were evaluated by distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs), and scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: The animals that were conditioned with noise did not show any protective effect compared with the ones that received only the ototoxic gentamicin administration. This lack of protection was observed functionally and morphologically. CONCLUSION: Conditioning with 85 dB broadband noises, 30 min a day for ten consecutive days does not protect against an ototoxic gentamicin administration of 160 mg/kg/day for ten consecutive days in the guinea pig. Elsevier 2014-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9444619/ /pubmed/25303813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.07.009 Text en © 2014 Associac¸ão Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Strose, Alex Hyppolito, Miguel Ângelo Colombari, Gleice Cristina Rossato, Maria de Oliveira, Jose Antônio Aparecido Lack of protection against gentamicin ototoxicity by auditory conditioning with noise()() |
title | Lack of protection against gentamicin ototoxicity by auditory conditioning with noise()() |
title_full | Lack of protection against gentamicin ototoxicity by auditory conditioning with noise()() |
title_fullStr | Lack of protection against gentamicin ototoxicity by auditory conditioning with noise()() |
title_full_unstemmed | Lack of protection against gentamicin ototoxicity by auditory conditioning with noise()() |
title_short | Lack of protection against gentamicin ototoxicity by auditory conditioning with noise()() |
title_sort | lack of protection against gentamicin ototoxicity by auditory conditioning with noise()() |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25303813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.07.009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strosealex lackofprotectionagainstgentamicinototoxicitybyauditoryconditioningwithnoise AT hyppolitomiguelangelo lackofprotectionagainstgentamicinototoxicitybyauditoryconditioningwithnoise AT colombarigleicecristina lackofprotectionagainstgentamicinototoxicitybyauditoryconditioningwithnoise AT rossatomaria lackofprotectionagainstgentamicinototoxicitybyauditoryconditioningwithnoise AT deoliveirajoseantonioaparecido lackofprotectionagainstgentamicinototoxicitybyauditoryconditioningwithnoise |