Cargando…

Hearing performance as a predictor of postural recovery in cochlear implant users()

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate if hearing performance is a predictor of postural control in cochlear implant (CI) users at least six months after surgery. METHODS: Cross-sectional study including (CI) recipients with post-lingual deafness and controls who were divided into the following gro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greters, Mario Edvin, Bittar, Roseli Saraiva Moreira, Grasel, Signe Schuster, Oiticica, Jeanne, Bento, Ricardo Ferreira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27090567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.01.002
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate if hearing performance is a predictor of postural control in cochlear implant (CI) users at least six months after surgery. METHODS: Cross-sectional study including (CI) recipients with post-lingual deafness and controls who were divided into the following groups: nine CI users with good hearing performance (G+), five CI users with poor hearing performance (G−), and seven controls (CG). For each patient, computerized dynamic posturography (CDP) tests, a sensory organization test (SOT), and an adaptation test (ADT) were applied as dual task performance, with first test (FT) and re-test (RT) on the same day, including a 40–60 min interval between them to evaluate the short-term learning ability on postural recovery strategies. The results of the groups were compared. RESULTS: Comparing the dual task performance on CDP and the weighted average between all test conditions, the G+ group showed better performance on RT in SOT4, SOT5, SOT6, and CS, which was not observed for G− and CG. The G− group had significantly lower levels of short-term learning ability than the other two groups in SOT5 (p = 0.021), SOT6 (p = 0.025), and CS (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: The CI users with good hearing performance had a higher index of postural recovery when compared to CI users with poor hearing performance.