Cargando…
Hearing performance as a predictor of postural recovery in cochlear implant users()
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate if hearing performance is a predictor of postural control in cochlear implant (CI) users at least six months after surgery. METHODS: Cross-sectional study including (CI) recipients with post-lingual deafness and controls who were divided into the following gro...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27090567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.01.002 |
_version_ | 1784783306056794112 |
---|---|
author | Greters, Mario Edvin Bittar, Roseli Saraiva Moreira Grasel, Signe Schuster Oiticica, Jeanne Bento, Ricardo Ferreira |
author_facet | Greters, Mario Edvin Bittar, Roseli Saraiva Moreira Grasel, Signe Schuster Oiticica, Jeanne Bento, Ricardo Ferreira |
author_sort | Greters, Mario Edvin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate if hearing performance is a predictor of postural control in cochlear implant (CI) users at least six months after surgery. METHODS: Cross-sectional study including (CI) recipients with post-lingual deafness and controls who were divided into the following groups: nine CI users with good hearing performance (G+), five CI users with poor hearing performance (G−), and seven controls (CG). For each patient, computerized dynamic posturography (CDP) tests, a sensory organization test (SOT), and an adaptation test (ADT) were applied as dual task performance, with first test (FT) and re-test (RT) on the same day, including a 40–60 min interval between them to evaluate the short-term learning ability on postural recovery strategies. The results of the groups were compared. RESULTS: Comparing the dual task performance on CDP and the weighted average between all test conditions, the G+ group showed better performance on RT in SOT4, SOT5, SOT6, and CS, which was not observed for G− and CG. The G− group had significantly lower levels of short-term learning ability than the other two groups in SOT5 (p = 0.021), SOT6 (p = 0.025), and CS (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: The CI users with good hearing performance had a higher index of postural recovery when compared to CI users with poor hearing performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9444772 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94447722022-09-09 Hearing performance as a predictor of postural recovery in cochlear implant users() Greters, Mario Edvin Bittar, Roseli Saraiva Moreira Grasel, Signe Schuster Oiticica, Jeanne Bento, Ricardo Ferreira Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate if hearing performance is a predictor of postural control in cochlear implant (CI) users at least six months after surgery. METHODS: Cross-sectional study including (CI) recipients with post-lingual deafness and controls who were divided into the following groups: nine CI users with good hearing performance (G+), five CI users with poor hearing performance (G−), and seven controls (CG). For each patient, computerized dynamic posturography (CDP) tests, a sensory organization test (SOT), and an adaptation test (ADT) were applied as dual task performance, with first test (FT) and re-test (RT) on the same day, including a 40–60 min interval between them to evaluate the short-term learning ability on postural recovery strategies. The results of the groups were compared. RESULTS: Comparing the dual task performance on CDP and the weighted average between all test conditions, the G+ group showed better performance on RT in SOT4, SOT5, SOT6, and CS, which was not observed for G− and CG. The G− group had significantly lower levels of short-term learning ability than the other two groups in SOT5 (p = 0.021), SOT6 (p = 0.025), and CS (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: The CI users with good hearing performance had a higher index of postural recovery when compared to CI users with poor hearing performance. Elsevier 2016-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9444772/ /pubmed/27090567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.01.002 Text en © 2016 Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. on behalf of Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Greters, Mario Edvin Bittar, Roseli Saraiva Moreira Grasel, Signe Schuster Oiticica, Jeanne Bento, Ricardo Ferreira Hearing performance as a predictor of postural recovery in cochlear implant users() |
title | Hearing performance as a predictor of postural recovery in cochlear implant users() |
title_full | Hearing performance as a predictor of postural recovery in cochlear implant users() |
title_fullStr | Hearing performance as a predictor of postural recovery in cochlear implant users() |
title_full_unstemmed | Hearing performance as a predictor of postural recovery in cochlear implant users() |
title_short | Hearing performance as a predictor of postural recovery in cochlear implant users() |
title_sort | hearing performance as a predictor of postural recovery in cochlear implant users() |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27090567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.01.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gretersmarioedvin hearingperformanceasapredictorofposturalrecoveryincochlearimplantusers AT bittarroselisaraivamoreira hearingperformanceasapredictorofposturalrecoveryincochlearimplantusers AT graselsigneschuster hearingperformanceasapredictorofposturalrecoveryincochlearimplantusers AT oiticicajeanne hearingperformanceasapredictorofposturalrecoveryincochlearimplantusers AT bentoricardoferreira hearingperformanceasapredictorofposturalrecoveryincochlearimplantusers |