Cargando…

Hearing performance as a predictor of postural recovery in cochlear implant users()

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate if hearing performance is a predictor of postural control in cochlear implant (CI) users at least six months after surgery. METHODS: Cross-sectional study including (CI) recipients with post-lingual deafness and controls who were divided into the following gro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greters, Mario Edvin, Bittar, Roseli Saraiva Moreira, Grasel, Signe Schuster, Oiticica, Jeanne, Bento, Ricardo Ferreira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27090567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.01.002
_version_ 1784783306056794112
author Greters, Mario Edvin
Bittar, Roseli Saraiva Moreira
Grasel, Signe Schuster
Oiticica, Jeanne
Bento, Ricardo Ferreira
author_facet Greters, Mario Edvin
Bittar, Roseli Saraiva Moreira
Grasel, Signe Schuster
Oiticica, Jeanne
Bento, Ricardo Ferreira
author_sort Greters, Mario Edvin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate if hearing performance is a predictor of postural control in cochlear implant (CI) users at least six months after surgery. METHODS: Cross-sectional study including (CI) recipients with post-lingual deafness and controls who were divided into the following groups: nine CI users with good hearing performance (G+), five CI users with poor hearing performance (G−), and seven controls (CG). For each patient, computerized dynamic posturography (CDP) tests, a sensory organization test (SOT), and an adaptation test (ADT) were applied as dual task performance, with first test (FT) and re-test (RT) on the same day, including a 40–60 min interval between them to evaluate the short-term learning ability on postural recovery strategies. The results of the groups were compared. RESULTS: Comparing the dual task performance on CDP and the weighted average between all test conditions, the G+ group showed better performance on RT in SOT4, SOT5, SOT6, and CS, which was not observed for G− and CG. The G− group had significantly lower levels of short-term learning ability than the other two groups in SOT5 (p = 0.021), SOT6 (p = 0.025), and CS (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: The CI users with good hearing performance had a higher index of postural recovery when compared to CI users with poor hearing performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9444772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94447722022-09-09 Hearing performance as a predictor of postural recovery in cochlear implant users() Greters, Mario Edvin Bittar, Roseli Saraiva Moreira Grasel, Signe Schuster Oiticica, Jeanne Bento, Ricardo Ferreira Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate if hearing performance is a predictor of postural control in cochlear implant (CI) users at least six months after surgery. METHODS: Cross-sectional study including (CI) recipients with post-lingual deafness and controls who were divided into the following groups: nine CI users with good hearing performance (G+), five CI users with poor hearing performance (G−), and seven controls (CG). For each patient, computerized dynamic posturography (CDP) tests, a sensory organization test (SOT), and an adaptation test (ADT) were applied as dual task performance, with first test (FT) and re-test (RT) on the same day, including a 40–60 min interval between them to evaluate the short-term learning ability on postural recovery strategies. The results of the groups were compared. RESULTS: Comparing the dual task performance on CDP and the weighted average between all test conditions, the G+ group showed better performance on RT in SOT4, SOT5, SOT6, and CS, which was not observed for G− and CG. The G− group had significantly lower levels of short-term learning ability than the other two groups in SOT5 (p = 0.021), SOT6 (p = 0.025), and CS (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: The CI users with good hearing performance had a higher index of postural recovery when compared to CI users with poor hearing performance. Elsevier 2016-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9444772/ /pubmed/27090567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.01.002 Text en © 2016 Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. on behalf of Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Greters, Mario Edvin
Bittar, Roseli Saraiva Moreira
Grasel, Signe Schuster
Oiticica, Jeanne
Bento, Ricardo Ferreira
Hearing performance as a predictor of postural recovery in cochlear implant users()
title Hearing performance as a predictor of postural recovery in cochlear implant users()
title_full Hearing performance as a predictor of postural recovery in cochlear implant users()
title_fullStr Hearing performance as a predictor of postural recovery in cochlear implant users()
title_full_unstemmed Hearing performance as a predictor of postural recovery in cochlear implant users()
title_short Hearing performance as a predictor of postural recovery in cochlear implant users()
title_sort hearing performance as a predictor of postural recovery in cochlear implant users()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27090567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.01.002
work_keys_str_mv AT gretersmarioedvin hearingperformanceasapredictorofposturalrecoveryincochlearimplantusers
AT bittarroselisaraivamoreira hearingperformanceasapredictorofposturalrecoveryincochlearimplantusers
AT graselsigneschuster hearingperformanceasapredictorofposturalrecoveryincochlearimplantusers
AT oiticicajeanne hearingperformanceasapredictorofposturalrecoveryincochlearimplantusers
AT bentoricardoferreira hearingperformanceasapredictorofposturalrecoveryincochlearimplantusers