Cargando…

Mode of recording and modulation frequency effects of auditory steady state response thresholds()

INTRODUCTION: The performance of auditory steady state response (ASSR) in threshold testing when recorded ipsilaterally and contralaterally, as well as at low and high modulation frequencies (MFs), has not been systematically studied. OBJECTIVE: To verify the influences of mode of recording (ipsilat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jalaei, Bahram, Shaabani, Moslem, Zakaria, Mohd Normani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27102175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.12.005
_version_ 1784783307065524224
author Jalaei, Bahram
Shaabani, Moslem
Zakaria, Mohd Normani
author_facet Jalaei, Bahram
Shaabani, Moslem
Zakaria, Mohd Normani
author_sort Jalaei, Bahram
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The performance of auditory steady state response (ASSR) in threshold testing when recorded ipsilaterally and contralaterally, as well as at low and high modulation frequencies (MFs), has not been systematically studied. OBJECTIVE: To verify the influences of mode of recording (ipsilateral vs. contralateral) and modulation frequency (40 Hz vs. 90 Hz) on ASSR thresholds. METHODS: Fifteen female and 14 male subjects (aged 18–30 years) with normal hearing bilaterally were studied. Narrow-band CE-chirp(®) stimuli (centerd at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) modulated at 40 and 90 Hz MFs were presented to the participants’ right ear. The ASSR thresholds were then recorded at each test frequency in both ipsilateral and contralateral channels. RESULTS: Due to pronounced interaction effects between mode of recording and MF (p < 0.05 by two-way repeated measures ANOVA), mean ASSR thresholds were then compared among four conditions (ipsi-40 Hz, ipsi-90 Hz, contra-40 Hz, and contra-90 Hz) using one-way repeated measures ANOVA. At the 500 and 1000 Hz test frequencies, contra-40 Hz condition produced the lowest mean ASSR thresholds. In contrast, at high frequencies (2000 and 4000 Hz), ipsi-90 Hz condition revealed the lowest mean ASSR thresholds. At most test frequencies, contra-90 Hz produced the highest mean ASSR thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings, the present study recommends two different protocols for an optimum threshold testing with ASSR, at least when testing young adults. This includes the use of contra-40 Hz recording mode due to its promising performance in hearing threshold estimation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9444776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94447762022-09-09 Mode of recording and modulation frequency effects of auditory steady state response thresholds() Jalaei, Bahram Shaabani, Moslem Zakaria, Mohd Normani Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: The performance of auditory steady state response (ASSR) in threshold testing when recorded ipsilaterally and contralaterally, as well as at low and high modulation frequencies (MFs), has not been systematically studied. OBJECTIVE: To verify the influences of mode of recording (ipsilateral vs. contralateral) and modulation frequency (40 Hz vs. 90 Hz) on ASSR thresholds. METHODS: Fifteen female and 14 male subjects (aged 18–30 years) with normal hearing bilaterally were studied. Narrow-band CE-chirp(®) stimuli (centerd at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) modulated at 40 and 90 Hz MFs were presented to the participants’ right ear. The ASSR thresholds were then recorded at each test frequency in both ipsilateral and contralateral channels. RESULTS: Due to pronounced interaction effects between mode of recording and MF (p < 0.05 by two-way repeated measures ANOVA), mean ASSR thresholds were then compared among four conditions (ipsi-40 Hz, ipsi-90 Hz, contra-40 Hz, and contra-90 Hz) using one-way repeated measures ANOVA. At the 500 and 1000 Hz test frequencies, contra-40 Hz condition produced the lowest mean ASSR thresholds. In contrast, at high frequencies (2000 and 4000 Hz), ipsi-90 Hz condition revealed the lowest mean ASSR thresholds. At most test frequencies, contra-90 Hz produced the highest mean ASSR thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings, the present study recommends two different protocols for an optimum threshold testing with ASSR, at least when testing young adults. This includes the use of contra-40 Hz recording mode due to its promising performance in hearing threshold estimation. Elsevier 2016-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9444776/ /pubmed/27102175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.12.005 Text en © 2016 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Jalaei, Bahram
Shaabani, Moslem
Zakaria, Mohd Normani
Mode of recording and modulation frequency effects of auditory steady state response thresholds()
title Mode of recording and modulation frequency effects of auditory steady state response thresholds()
title_full Mode of recording and modulation frequency effects of auditory steady state response thresholds()
title_fullStr Mode of recording and modulation frequency effects of auditory steady state response thresholds()
title_full_unstemmed Mode of recording and modulation frequency effects of auditory steady state response thresholds()
title_short Mode of recording and modulation frequency effects of auditory steady state response thresholds()
title_sort mode of recording and modulation frequency effects of auditory steady state response thresholds()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27102175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.12.005
work_keys_str_mv AT jalaeibahram modeofrecordingandmodulationfrequencyeffectsofauditorysteadystateresponsethresholds
AT shaabanimoslem modeofrecordingandmodulationfrequencyeffectsofauditorysteadystateresponsethresholds
AT zakariamohdnormani modeofrecordingandmodulationfrequencyeffectsofauditorysteadystateresponsethresholds