Cargando…
Difficult septal deviation cases: open or closed technique?()
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to compare the functional aspects of open technique (OTS) and endonasal septoplasty (ENS) in “difficult septal deviation cases”. METHODS: 60 patients with severe nasal obstruction from S-shaped deformities, multiple deformities, high deviations etc. were includ...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27210822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.03.015 |
_version_ | 1784783308557647872 |
---|---|
author | Şevik Eliçora, Sultan Erdem, Duygu Işık, Hüseyin Damar, Murat Dinç, Aykut Erdem |
author_facet | Şevik Eliçora, Sultan Erdem, Duygu Işık, Hüseyin Damar, Murat Dinç, Aykut Erdem |
author_sort | Şevik Eliçora, Sultan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to compare the functional aspects of open technique (OTS) and endonasal septoplasty (ENS) in “difficult septal deviation cases”. METHODS: 60 patients with severe nasal obstruction from S-shaped deformities, multiple deformities, high deviations etc. were included in the study. The OTS was used in 30 patients and the ENS was performed in 30 patients. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale was administered preoperatively and at first month following surgery. Patients were also evaluated for pain postoperatively with Visual Analog Scale (VAS). RESULTS: The mean NOSE score was decreased 62.5–11.0 in the OTS group and 61.3–21.33 in the ENS group. Improvement of the symptoms following the two surgical techniques is similar and no statistically significant difference was found between both techniques. Also there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain between the OTS and ENS groups evaluated by VAS. CONCLUSION: ENS is as successful as the OTS in management difficult septal deviation cases. In patients with severe septal deformities type of the surgical technique should be selected according to the surgeon's experience and the patient's preference. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9444782 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94447822022-09-09 Difficult septal deviation cases: open or closed technique?() Şevik Eliçora, Sultan Erdem, Duygu Işık, Hüseyin Damar, Murat Dinç, Aykut Erdem Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to compare the functional aspects of open technique (OTS) and endonasal septoplasty (ENS) in “difficult septal deviation cases”. METHODS: 60 patients with severe nasal obstruction from S-shaped deformities, multiple deformities, high deviations etc. were included in the study. The OTS was used in 30 patients and the ENS was performed in 30 patients. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale was administered preoperatively and at first month following surgery. Patients were also evaluated for pain postoperatively with Visual Analog Scale (VAS). RESULTS: The mean NOSE score was decreased 62.5–11.0 in the OTS group and 61.3–21.33 in the ENS group. Improvement of the symptoms following the two surgical techniques is similar and no statistically significant difference was found between both techniques. Also there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain between the OTS and ENS groups evaluated by VAS. CONCLUSION: ENS is as successful as the OTS in management difficult septal deviation cases. In patients with severe septal deformities type of the surgical technique should be selected according to the surgeon's experience and the patient's preference. Elsevier 2016-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9444782/ /pubmed/27210822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.03.015 Text en © 2016 Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. on behalf of Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Şevik Eliçora, Sultan Erdem, Duygu Işık, Hüseyin Damar, Murat Dinç, Aykut Erdem Difficult septal deviation cases: open or closed technique?() |
title | Difficult septal deviation cases: open or closed technique?() |
title_full | Difficult septal deviation cases: open or closed technique?() |
title_fullStr | Difficult septal deviation cases: open or closed technique?() |
title_full_unstemmed | Difficult septal deviation cases: open or closed technique?() |
title_short | Difficult septal deviation cases: open or closed technique?() |
title_sort | difficult septal deviation cases: open or closed technique?() |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27210822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.03.015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sevikelicorasultan difficultseptaldeviationcasesopenorclosedtechnique AT erdemduygu difficultseptaldeviationcasesopenorclosedtechnique AT isıkhuseyin difficultseptaldeviationcasesopenorclosedtechnique AT damarmurat difficultseptaldeviationcasesopenorclosedtechnique AT dincaykuterdem difficultseptaldeviationcasesopenorclosedtechnique |