Cargando…

Difficult septal deviation cases: open or closed technique?()

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to compare the functional aspects of open technique (OTS) and endonasal septoplasty (ENS) in “difficult septal deviation cases”. METHODS: 60 patients with severe nasal obstruction from S-shaped deformities, multiple deformities, high deviations etc. were includ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Şevik Eliçora, Sultan, Erdem, Duygu, Işık, Hüseyin, Damar, Murat, Dinç, Aykut Erdem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27210822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.03.015
_version_ 1784783308557647872
author Şevik Eliçora, Sultan
Erdem, Duygu
Işık, Hüseyin
Damar, Murat
Dinç, Aykut Erdem
author_facet Şevik Eliçora, Sultan
Erdem, Duygu
Işık, Hüseyin
Damar, Murat
Dinç, Aykut Erdem
author_sort Şevik Eliçora, Sultan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to compare the functional aspects of open technique (OTS) and endonasal septoplasty (ENS) in “difficult septal deviation cases”. METHODS: 60 patients with severe nasal obstruction from S-shaped deformities, multiple deformities, high deviations etc. were included in the study. The OTS was used in 30 patients and the ENS was performed in 30 patients. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale was administered preoperatively and at first month following surgery. Patients were also evaluated for pain postoperatively with Visual Analog Scale (VAS). RESULTS: The mean NOSE score was decreased 62.5–11.0 in the OTS group and 61.3–21.33 in the ENS group. Improvement of the symptoms following the two surgical techniques is similar and no statistically significant difference was found between both techniques. Also there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain between the OTS and ENS groups evaluated by VAS. CONCLUSION: ENS is as successful as the OTS in management difficult septal deviation cases. In patients with severe septal deformities type of the surgical technique should be selected according to the surgeon's experience and the patient's preference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9444782
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94447822022-09-09 Difficult septal deviation cases: open or closed technique?() Şevik Eliçora, Sultan Erdem, Duygu Işık, Hüseyin Damar, Murat Dinç, Aykut Erdem Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to compare the functional aspects of open technique (OTS) and endonasal septoplasty (ENS) in “difficult septal deviation cases”. METHODS: 60 patients with severe nasal obstruction from S-shaped deformities, multiple deformities, high deviations etc. were included in the study. The OTS was used in 30 patients and the ENS was performed in 30 patients. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale was administered preoperatively and at first month following surgery. Patients were also evaluated for pain postoperatively with Visual Analog Scale (VAS). RESULTS: The mean NOSE score was decreased 62.5–11.0 in the OTS group and 61.3–21.33 in the ENS group. Improvement of the symptoms following the two surgical techniques is similar and no statistically significant difference was found between both techniques. Also there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain between the OTS and ENS groups evaluated by VAS. CONCLUSION: ENS is as successful as the OTS in management difficult septal deviation cases. In patients with severe septal deformities type of the surgical technique should be selected according to the surgeon's experience and the patient's preference. Elsevier 2016-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9444782/ /pubmed/27210822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.03.015 Text en © 2016 Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. on behalf of Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Şevik Eliçora, Sultan
Erdem, Duygu
Işık, Hüseyin
Damar, Murat
Dinç, Aykut Erdem
Difficult septal deviation cases: open or closed technique?()
title Difficult septal deviation cases: open or closed technique?()
title_full Difficult septal deviation cases: open or closed technique?()
title_fullStr Difficult septal deviation cases: open or closed technique?()
title_full_unstemmed Difficult septal deviation cases: open or closed technique?()
title_short Difficult septal deviation cases: open or closed technique?()
title_sort difficult septal deviation cases: open or closed technique?()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9444782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27210822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.03.015
work_keys_str_mv AT sevikelicorasultan difficultseptaldeviationcasesopenorclosedtechnique
AT erdemduygu difficultseptaldeviationcasesopenorclosedtechnique
AT isıkhuseyin difficultseptaldeviationcasesopenorclosedtechnique
AT damarmurat difficultseptaldeviationcasesopenorclosedtechnique
AT dincaykuterdem difficultseptaldeviationcasesopenorclosedtechnique