Cargando…

Low test–retest reliability of a protocol for assessing somatosensory cortex excitability generated from sensory nerves of the lower back

In people with chronic low back pain (CLBP), maladaptive structural and functional changes on a cortical level have been identified. On a functional level, somatosensory cortical excitability has been shown to be reduced in chronic pain conditions, resulting in cortical disinhibition. The occurrence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ehrenbrusthoff, Katja, Ryan, Cormac G., Martin, Denis J., Milnik, Volker, Dinse, Hubert R., Grüneberg, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36082228
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.898759
_version_ 1784783355594670080
author Ehrenbrusthoff, Katja
Ryan, Cormac G.
Martin, Denis J.
Milnik, Volker
Dinse, Hubert R.
Grüneberg, Christian
author_facet Ehrenbrusthoff, Katja
Ryan, Cormac G.
Martin, Denis J.
Milnik, Volker
Dinse, Hubert R.
Grüneberg, Christian
author_sort Ehrenbrusthoff, Katja
collection PubMed
description In people with chronic low back pain (CLBP), maladaptive structural and functional changes on a cortical level have been identified. On a functional level, somatosensory cortical excitability has been shown to be reduced in chronic pain conditions, resulting in cortical disinhibition. The occurrence of structural and/or functional maladaptive cortical changes in people with CLBP could play a role in maintaining the pain. There is currently no measurement protocol for cortical excitability that employs stimulation directly to the lower back. We developed a protocol for the measurement of single pulse somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) waveforms and paired-pulse behavior (PPB) generated from sensory nerves of the lower back and quantified its test–retest reliability in a sample of 30 healthy individuals to gain insights into the normal variability of cortical responses, which could then be compared to results from people with CLBP. We investigated cortical excitability by measuring SEPs and PPB. PPB was defined as the ratio of the amplitude of the second cortical response (A2s) divided by the first cortical response (A1). A2s was determined by subtracting the response to single-pulse stimuli from the paired pulse stimuli response to account for linear superposition effects. The test–retest reliability of the protocol was very poor with no evidence of systematic bias but a high amount of random variability between sessions. There was no significant difference in the right side PPB for session 1 (Mean ratio A2s/A1 = 0.66, SD = 0.54) and session 2 (Mean ratio A2s/A1 = 0.94, SD = 1.56); mean session difference [(95% CI) = −0.44 (−1.23 to 0.34); t (22) = −1.17, p = 0.26]. The ICC(3).(1) (absolute agreement) for the outlier-removed right side PPB were 0.19 (95% CI: −0.84 to 0.66) and 0.43 for left side PPB (95% CI: −0.37 to 0.76). This finding potentially has wider implications for PPB protocols. If these findings were replicated in other groups and other nerves, it would question the validity of this measure more generally. However, these findings are restricted to healthy people and sensory nerves of the lower back and may not be generalizable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9445117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94451172022-09-07 Low test–retest reliability of a protocol for assessing somatosensory cortex excitability generated from sensory nerves of the lower back Ehrenbrusthoff, Katja Ryan, Cormac G. Martin, Denis J. Milnik, Volker Dinse, Hubert R. Grüneberg, Christian Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience In people with chronic low back pain (CLBP), maladaptive structural and functional changes on a cortical level have been identified. On a functional level, somatosensory cortical excitability has been shown to be reduced in chronic pain conditions, resulting in cortical disinhibition. The occurrence of structural and/or functional maladaptive cortical changes in people with CLBP could play a role in maintaining the pain. There is currently no measurement protocol for cortical excitability that employs stimulation directly to the lower back. We developed a protocol for the measurement of single pulse somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) waveforms and paired-pulse behavior (PPB) generated from sensory nerves of the lower back and quantified its test–retest reliability in a sample of 30 healthy individuals to gain insights into the normal variability of cortical responses, which could then be compared to results from people with CLBP. We investigated cortical excitability by measuring SEPs and PPB. PPB was defined as the ratio of the amplitude of the second cortical response (A2s) divided by the first cortical response (A1). A2s was determined by subtracting the response to single-pulse stimuli from the paired pulse stimuli response to account for linear superposition effects. The test–retest reliability of the protocol was very poor with no evidence of systematic bias but a high amount of random variability between sessions. There was no significant difference in the right side PPB for session 1 (Mean ratio A2s/A1 = 0.66, SD = 0.54) and session 2 (Mean ratio A2s/A1 = 0.94, SD = 1.56); mean session difference [(95% CI) = −0.44 (−1.23 to 0.34); t (22) = −1.17, p = 0.26]. The ICC(3).(1) (absolute agreement) for the outlier-removed right side PPB were 0.19 (95% CI: −0.84 to 0.66) and 0.43 for left side PPB (95% CI: −0.37 to 0.76). This finding potentially has wider implications for PPB protocols. If these findings were replicated in other groups and other nerves, it would question the validity of this measure more generally. However, these findings are restricted to healthy people and sensory nerves of the lower back and may not be generalizable. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9445117/ /pubmed/36082228 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.898759 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ehrenbrusthoff, Ryan, Martin, Milnik, Dinse and Grüneberg. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Human Neuroscience
Ehrenbrusthoff, Katja
Ryan, Cormac G.
Martin, Denis J.
Milnik, Volker
Dinse, Hubert R.
Grüneberg, Christian
Low test–retest reliability of a protocol for assessing somatosensory cortex excitability generated from sensory nerves of the lower back
title Low test–retest reliability of a protocol for assessing somatosensory cortex excitability generated from sensory nerves of the lower back
title_full Low test–retest reliability of a protocol for assessing somatosensory cortex excitability generated from sensory nerves of the lower back
title_fullStr Low test–retest reliability of a protocol for assessing somatosensory cortex excitability generated from sensory nerves of the lower back
title_full_unstemmed Low test–retest reliability of a protocol for assessing somatosensory cortex excitability generated from sensory nerves of the lower back
title_short Low test–retest reliability of a protocol for assessing somatosensory cortex excitability generated from sensory nerves of the lower back
title_sort low test–retest reliability of a protocol for assessing somatosensory cortex excitability generated from sensory nerves of the lower back
topic Human Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36082228
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.898759
work_keys_str_mv AT ehrenbrusthoffkatja lowtestretestreliabilityofaprotocolforassessingsomatosensorycortexexcitabilitygeneratedfromsensorynervesofthelowerback
AT ryancormacg lowtestretestreliabilityofaprotocolforassessingsomatosensorycortexexcitabilitygeneratedfromsensorynervesofthelowerback
AT martindenisj lowtestretestreliabilityofaprotocolforassessingsomatosensorycortexexcitabilitygeneratedfromsensorynervesofthelowerback
AT milnikvolker lowtestretestreliabilityofaprotocolforassessingsomatosensorycortexexcitabilitygeneratedfromsensorynervesofthelowerback
AT dinsehubertr lowtestretestreliabilityofaprotocolforassessingsomatosensorycortexexcitabilitygeneratedfromsensorynervesofthelowerback
AT grunebergchristian lowtestretestreliabilityofaprotocolforassessingsomatosensorycortexexcitabilitygeneratedfromsensorynervesofthelowerback