Cargando…
Embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization: a retrospective comparison of outcomes with different techniques in two centres
BACKGROUND: Embolisation of the parenchymal tract is a key step after any other transhepatic or transplenic percutaneous portal vein catheterization since eventual venous bleeding is difficult to control and may require surgical management. Different techniques have been proposed to perform tract em...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36063253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-022-00321-2 |
_version_ | 1784783360897318912 |
---|---|
author | Marra, Paolo Carbone, Francesco Saverio Augello, Luigi Dulcetta, Ludovico Muglia, Riccardo Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea Della Corte, Angelo Steidler, Stephanie Gusmini, Simone Guazzarotti, Giorgia Palumbo, Diego Venturini, Massimo De Cobelli, Francesco Sironi, Sandro |
author_facet | Marra, Paolo Carbone, Francesco Saverio Augello, Luigi Dulcetta, Ludovico Muglia, Riccardo Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea Della Corte, Angelo Steidler, Stephanie Gusmini, Simone Guazzarotti, Giorgia Palumbo, Diego Venturini, Massimo De Cobelli, Francesco Sironi, Sandro |
author_sort | Marra, Paolo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Embolisation of the parenchymal tract is a key step after any other transhepatic or transplenic percutaneous portal vein catheterization since eventual venous bleeding is difficult to control and may require surgical management. Different techniques have been proposed to perform tract embolisation. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of different techniques of haemostasis of the parenchymal tract. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All the interventional procedures with percutaneous transhepatic or transplenic access to the portal vein (excluding ipsilateral portal vein embolisation) from January 2010 to July 2020, in two tertiary hospitals, were retrospectively analyzed. The following data were evaluated: access site, the technique of embolisation, technical success in terms of immediate thrombosis of the tract, safety and clinical efficacy in terms of the absence of hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. RESULTS: One-hundred-sixty-one patients underwent 220 percutaneous transhepatic or transplenic portal vein catheterization procedures. The main indications were pancreatic islet transplantation, portal anastomotic stenosis after liver transplantation, and portal vein thrombosis recanalization. As embolic materials gelfoam was used in 105 cases, metallic micro-coils in 54 cases, and cyanoacrylic glue in 44 cases; in 17 cases the parenchymal tract was not embolized. Technical success was 98% without significant difference among groups (p-value = 0.22). Eighteen post-procedural abdominal bleedings occurred, all grade 3 and were managed conservatively; difference among groups was not significant (p-value = 0.25). We detected 12 intrahepatic portal branch thromboses not related to the embolisation technique; only one case of non-target embolisation was documented after liver tract embolisation with glue, without clinical consequences. CONCLUSION: Embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization is technically safe and effective. No significant differences were found between coils, glue, and gelfoam in effectiveness and complications rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, Cohort study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9445138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94451382022-09-07 Embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization: a retrospective comparison of outcomes with different techniques in two centres Marra, Paolo Carbone, Francesco Saverio Augello, Luigi Dulcetta, Ludovico Muglia, Riccardo Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea Della Corte, Angelo Steidler, Stephanie Gusmini, Simone Guazzarotti, Giorgia Palumbo, Diego Venturini, Massimo De Cobelli, Francesco Sironi, Sandro CVIR Endovasc Original Article BACKGROUND: Embolisation of the parenchymal tract is a key step after any other transhepatic or transplenic percutaneous portal vein catheterization since eventual venous bleeding is difficult to control and may require surgical management. Different techniques have been proposed to perform tract embolisation. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of different techniques of haemostasis of the parenchymal tract. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All the interventional procedures with percutaneous transhepatic or transplenic access to the portal vein (excluding ipsilateral portal vein embolisation) from January 2010 to July 2020, in two tertiary hospitals, were retrospectively analyzed. The following data were evaluated: access site, the technique of embolisation, technical success in terms of immediate thrombosis of the tract, safety and clinical efficacy in terms of the absence of hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. RESULTS: One-hundred-sixty-one patients underwent 220 percutaneous transhepatic or transplenic portal vein catheterization procedures. The main indications were pancreatic islet transplantation, portal anastomotic stenosis after liver transplantation, and portal vein thrombosis recanalization. As embolic materials gelfoam was used in 105 cases, metallic micro-coils in 54 cases, and cyanoacrylic glue in 44 cases; in 17 cases the parenchymal tract was not embolized. Technical success was 98% without significant difference among groups (p-value = 0.22). Eighteen post-procedural abdominal bleedings occurred, all grade 3 and were managed conservatively; difference among groups was not significant (p-value = 0.25). We detected 12 intrahepatic portal branch thromboses not related to the embolisation technique; only one case of non-target embolisation was documented after liver tract embolisation with glue, without clinical consequences. CONCLUSION: Embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization is technically safe and effective. No significant differences were found between coils, glue, and gelfoam in effectiveness and complications rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, Cohort study. Springer International Publishing 2022-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9445138/ /pubmed/36063253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-022-00321-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Marra, Paolo Carbone, Francesco Saverio Augello, Luigi Dulcetta, Ludovico Muglia, Riccardo Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea Della Corte, Angelo Steidler, Stephanie Gusmini, Simone Guazzarotti, Giorgia Palumbo, Diego Venturini, Massimo De Cobelli, Francesco Sironi, Sandro Embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization: a retrospective comparison of outcomes with different techniques in two centres |
title | Embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization: a retrospective comparison of outcomes with different techniques in two centres |
title_full | Embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization: a retrospective comparison of outcomes with different techniques in two centres |
title_fullStr | Embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization: a retrospective comparison of outcomes with different techniques in two centres |
title_full_unstemmed | Embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization: a retrospective comparison of outcomes with different techniques in two centres |
title_short | Embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization: a retrospective comparison of outcomes with different techniques in two centres |
title_sort | embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization: a retrospective comparison of outcomes with different techniques in two centres |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36063253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-022-00321-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marrapaolo embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres AT carbonefrancescosaverio embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres AT augelloluigi embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres AT dulcettaludovico embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres AT mugliariccardo embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres AT bonaffinipietroandrea embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres AT dellacorteangelo embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres AT steidlerstephanie embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres AT gusminisimone embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres AT guazzarottigiorgia embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres AT palumbodiego embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres AT venturinimassimo embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres AT decobellifrancesco embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres AT sironisandro embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres |