Cargando…

Embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization: a retrospective comparison of outcomes with different techniques in two centres

BACKGROUND: Embolisation of the parenchymal tract is a key step after any other transhepatic or transplenic percutaneous portal vein catheterization since eventual venous bleeding is difficult to control and may require surgical management. Different techniques have been proposed to perform tract em...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marra, Paolo, Carbone, Francesco Saverio, Augello, Luigi, Dulcetta, Ludovico, Muglia, Riccardo, Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea, Della Corte, Angelo, Steidler, Stephanie, Gusmini, Simone, Guazzarotti, Giorgia, Palumbo, Diego, Venturini, Massimo, De Cobelli, Francesco, Sironi, Sandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36063253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-022-00321-2
_version_ 1784783360897318912
author Marra, Paolo
Carbone, Francesco Saverio
Augello, Luigi
Dulcetta, Ludovico
Muglia, Riccardo
Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea
Della Corte, Angelo
Steidler, Stephanie
Gusmini, Simone
Guazzarotti, Giorgia
Palumbo, Diego
Venturini, Massimo
De Cobelli, Francesco
Sironi, Sandro
author_facet Marra, Paolo
Carbone, Francesco Saverio
Augello, Luigi
Dulcetta, Ludovico
Muglia, Riccardo
Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea
Della Corte, Angelo
Steidler, Stephanie
Gusmini, Simone
Guazzarotti, Giorgia
Palumbo, Diego
Venturini, Massimo
De Cobelli, Francesco
Sironi, Sandro
author_sort Marra, Paolo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Embolisation of the parenchymal tract is a key step after any other transhepatic or transplenic percutaneous portal vein catheterization since eventual venous bleeding is difficult to control and may require surgical management. Different techniques have been proposed to perform tract embolisation. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of different techniques of haemostasis of the parenchymal tract. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All the interventional procedures with percutaneous transhepatic or transplenic access to the portal vein (excluding ipsilateral portal vein embolisation) from January 2010 to July 2020, in two tertiary hospitals, were retrospectively analyzed. The following data were evaluated: access site, the technique of embolisation, technical success in terms of immediate thrombosis of the tract, safety and clinical efficacy in terms of the absence of hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. RESULTS: One-hundred-sixty-one patients underwent 220 percutaneous transhepatic or transplenic portal vein catheterization procedures. The main indications were pancreatic islet transplantation, portal anastomotic stenosis after liver transplantation, and portal vein thrombosis recanalization. As embolic materials gelfoam was used in 105 cases, metallic micro-coils in 54 cases, and cyanoacrylic glue in 44 cases; in 17 cases the parenchymal tract was not embolized. Technical success was 98% without significant difference among groups (p-value = 0.22). Eighteen post-procedural abdominal bleedings occurred, all grade 3 and were managed conservatively; difference among groups was not significant (p-value = 0.25). We detected 12 intrahepatic portal branch thromboses not related to the embolisation technique; only one case of non-target embolisation was documented after liver tract embolisation with glue, without clinical consequences. CONCLUSION: Embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization is technically safe and effective. No significant differences were found between coils, glue, and gelfoam in effectiveness and complications rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, Cohort study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9445138
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94451382022-09-07 Embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization: a retrospective comparison of outcomes with different techniques in two centres Marra, Paolo Carbone, Francesco Saverio Augello, Luigi Dulcetta, Ludovico Muglia, Riccardo Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea Della Corte, Angelo Steidler, Stephanie Gusmini, Simone Guazzarotti, Giorgia Palumbo, Diego Venturini, Massimo De Cobelli, Francesco Sironi, Sandro CVIR Endovasc Original Article BACKGROUND: Embolisation of the parenchymal tract is a key step after any other transhepatic or transplenic percutaneous portal vein catheterization since eventual venous bleeding is difficult to control and may require surgical management. Different techniques have been proposed to perform tract embolisation. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of different techniques of haemostasis of the parenchymal tract. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All the interventional procedures with percutaneous transhepatic or transplenic access to the portal vein (excluding ipsilateral portal vein embolisation) from January 2010 to July 2020, in two tertiary hospitals, were retrospectively analyzed. The following data were evaluated: access site, the technique of embolisation, technical success in terms of immediate thrombosis of the tract, safety and clinical efficacy in terms of the absence of hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. RESULTS: One-hundred-sixty-one patients underwent 220 percutaneous transhepatic or transplenic portal vein catheterization procedures. The main indications were pancreatic islet transplantation, portal anastomotic stenosis after liver transplantation, and portal vein thrombosis recanalization. As embolic materials gelfoam was used in 105 cases, metallic micro-coils in 54 cases, and cyanoacrylic glue in 44 cases; in 17 cases the parenchymal tract was not embolized. Technical success was 98% without significant difference among groups (p-value = 0.22). Eighteen post-procedural abdominal bleedings occurred, all grade 3 and were managed conservatively; difference among groups was not significant (p-value = 0.25). We detected 12 intrahepatic portal branch thromboses not related to the embolisation technique; only one case of non-target embolisation was documented after liver tract embolisation with glue, without clinical consequences. CONCLUSION: Embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization is technically safe and effective. No significant differences were found between coils, glue, and gelfoam in effectiveness and complications rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, Cohort study. Springer International Publishing 2022-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9445138/ /pubmed/36063253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-022-00321-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Marra, Paolo
Carbone, Francesco Saverio
Augello, Luigi
Dulcetta, Ludovico
Muglia, Riccardo
Bonaffini, Pietro Andrea
Della Corte, Angelo
Steidler, Stephanie
Gusmini, Simone
Guazzarotti, Giorgia
Palumbo, Diego
Venturini, Massimo
De Cobelli, Francesco
Sironi, Sandro
Embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization: a retrospective comparison of outcomes with different techniques in two centres
title Embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization: a retrospective comparison of outcomes with different techniques in two centres
title_full Embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization: a retrospective comparison of outcomes with different techniques in two centres
title_fullStr Embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization: a retrospective comparison of outcomes with different techniques in two centres
title_full_unstemmed Embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization: a retrospective comparison of outcomes with different techniques in two centres
title_short Embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization: a retrospective comparison of outcomes with different techniques in two centres
title_sort embolisation of the parenchymal tract after percutaneous portal vein catheterization: a retrospective comparison of outcomes with different techniques in two centres
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445138/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36063253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-022-00321-2
work_keys_str_mv AT marrapaolo embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres
AT carbonefrancescosaverio embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres
AT augelloluigi embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres
AT dulcettaludovico embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres
AT mugliariccardo embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres
AT bonaffinipietroandrea embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres
AT dellacorteangelo embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres
AT steidlerstephanie embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres
AT gusminisimone embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres
AT guazzarottigiorgia embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres
AT palumbodiego embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres
AT venturinimassimo embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres
AT decobellifrancesco embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres
AT sironisandro embolisationoftheparenchymaltractafterpercutaneousportalveincatheterizationaretrospectivecomparisonofoutcomeswithdifferenttechniquesintwocentres