Cargando…
A randomized, double-blind, parallel control study to evaluate the biosimilarity of QL1209 with Perjeta(®) in healthy male subjects
Purpose: This is the first study to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety and, immunogenicity of QL1209, a biosimilar of Perjeta(®). Methods: This study was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled clinical trial evaluating the biosimilarity between QL1209 (specification: 420 mg:14 ml, single...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36081953 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.953641 |
_version_ | 1784783379418316800 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Yuanyuan Yang, Heng Yang, Xiaoyan Yang, Shuang Guo, Can Chen, Honghui Cui, Chang Xiang, Yuxia Yang, Guoping Huang, Jie |
author_facet | Sun, Yuanyuan Yang, Heng Yang, Xiaoyan Yang, Shuang Guo, Can Chen, Honghui Cui, Chang Xiang, Yuxia Yang, Guoping Huang, Jie |
author_sort | Sun, Yuanyuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: This is the first study to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety and, immunogenicity of QL1209, a biosimilar of Perjeta(®). Methods: This study was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled clinical trial evaluating the biosimilarity between QL1209 (specification: 420 mg:14 ml, single use via, manufacturer: Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., batch number: 201808001KJL) and Perjeta(®) (specification: 420 mg: 14 ml, single use via, manufacturer: Roche Pharma AG, batch number: H0309H02). The trial period was 99 days (blood samples for PK were collected 99 days after infusion). Serum concentrations were determined using a validated assay. PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental model and analyzed statistically. Anti-drug antibody (ADA)-positive samples were further tested for the presence of neutralization antibody detection (NAb). Results: A total of 137 healthy subjects were administrated. The subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive QL1209 or Perjeta(®) 420 mg intravenously. The geometric mean ratio (GMRs) for QL1209 versus Perjeta(®) are 104.14%, 104.09%, and 110.59% for C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-∞), respectively, and their 90% confidence interval (CIs) all fell within the predefined bioequivalence margin 80.00–125%. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was 95.6% and 95.5% in the QL1209 and Perjeta(®) groups, respectively, also comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: The results of this comparative clinical pharmacology study demonstrated the PK similarity of QL1209 (420 mg: 14 ml) and Perjeta(®) (420 mg: 14 ml) and there was no significant difference in safety and immunogenicity between QL1209 and Perjeta(®) manufactured by Roche Pharma AG. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9445216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94452162022-09-07 A randomized, double-blind, parallel control study to evaluate the biosimilarity of QL1209 with Perjeta(®) in healthy male subjects Sun, Yuanyuan Yang, Heng Yang, Xiaoyan Yang, Shuang Guo, Can Chen, Honghui Cui, Chang Xiang, Yuxia Yang, Guoping Huang, Jie Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Purpose: This is the first study to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety and, immunogenicity of QL1209, a biosimilar of Perjeta(®). Methods: This study was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled clinical trial evaluating the biosimilarity between QL1209 (specification: 420 mg:14 ml, single use via, manufacturer: Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., batch number: 201808001KJL) and Perjeta(®) (specification: 420 mg: 14 ml, single use via, manufacturer: Roche Pharma AG, batch number: H0309H02). The trial period was 99 days (blood samples for PK were collected 99 days after infusion). Serum concentrations were determined using a validated assay. PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental model and analyzed statistically. Anti-drug antibody (ADA)-positive samples were further tested for the presence of neutralization antibody detection (NAb). Results: A total of 137 healthy subjects were administrated. The subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive QL1209 or Perjeta(®) 420 mg intravenously. The geometric mean ratio (GMRs) for QL1209 versus Perjeta(®) are 104.14%, 104.09%, and 110.59% for C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-∞), respectively, and their 90% confidence interval (CIs) all fell within the predefined bioequivalence margin 80.00–125%. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was 95.6% and 95.5% in the QL1209 and Perjeta(®) groups, respectively, also comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: The results of this comparative clinical pharmacology study demonstrated the PK similarity of QL1209 (420 mg: 14 ml) and Perjeta(®) (420 mg: 14 ml) and there was no significant difference in safety and immunogenicity between QL1209 and Perjeta(®) manufactured by Roche Pharma AG. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9445216/ /pubmed/36081953 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.953641 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sun, Yang, Yang, Yang, Guo, Chen, Cui, Xiang, Yang and Huang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Sun, Yuanyuan Yang, Heng Yang, Xiaoyan Yang, Shuang Guo, Can Chen, Honghui Cui, Chang Xiang, Yuxia Yang, Guoping Huang, Jie A randomized, double-blind, parallel control study to evaluate the biosimilarity of QL1209 with Perjeta(®) in healthy male subjects |
title | A randomized, double-blind, parallel control study to evaluate the biosimilarity of QL1209 with Perjeta(®) in healthy male subjects |
title_full | A randomized, double-blind, parallel control study to evaluate the biosimilarity of QL1209 with Perjeta(®) in healthy male subjects |
title_fullStr | A randomized, double-blind, parallel control study to evaluate the biosimilarity of QL1209 with Perjeta(®) in healthy male subjects |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized, double-blind, parallel control study to evaluate the biosimilarity of QL1209 with Perjeta(®) in healthy male subjects |
title_short | A randomized, double-blind, parallel control study to evaluate the biosimilarity of QL1209 with Perjeta(®) in healthy male subjects |
title_sort | randomized, double-blind, parallel control study to evaluate the biosimilarity of ql1209 with perjeta(®) in healthy male subjects |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36081953 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.953641 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunyuanyuan arandomizeddoubleblindparallelcontrolstudytoevaluatethebiosimilarityofql1209withperjetainhealthymalesubjects AT yangheng arandomizeddoubleblindparallelcontrolstudytoevaluatethebiosimilarityofql1209withperjetainhealthymalesubjects AT yangxiaoyan arandomizeddoubleblindparallelcontrolstudytoevaluatethebiosimilarityofql1209withperjetainhealthymalesubjects AT yangshuang arandomizeddoubleblindparallelcontrolstudytoevaluatethebiosimilarityofql1209withperjetainhealthymalesubjects AT guocan arandomizeddoubleblindparallelcontrolstudytoevaluatethebiosimilarityofql1209withperjetainhealthymalesubjects AT chenhonghui arandomizeddoubleblindparallelcontrolstudytoevaluatethebiosimilarityofql1209withperjetainhealthymalesubjects AT cuichang arandomizeddoubleblindparallelcontrolstudytoevaluatethebiosimilarityofql1209withperjetainhealthymalesubjects AT xiangyuxia arandomizeddoubleblindparallelcontrolstudytoevaluatethebiosimilarityofql1209withperjetainhealthymalesubjects AT yangguoping arandomizeddoubleblindparallelcontrolstudytoevaluatethebiosimilarityofql1209withperjetainhealthymalesubjects AT huangjie arandomizeddoubleblindparallelcontrolstudytoevaluatethebiosimilarityofql1209withperjetainhealthymalesubjects AT sunyuanyuan randomizeddoubleblindparallelcontrolstudytoevaluatethebiosimilarityofql1209withperjetainhealthymalesubjects AT yangheng randomizeddoubleblindparallelcontrolstudytoevaluatethebiosimilarityofql1209withperjetainhealthymalesubjects AT yangxiaoyan randomizeddoubleblindparallelcontrolstudytoevaluatethebiosimilarityofql1209withperjetainhealthymalesubjects AT yangshuang randomizeddoubleblindparallelcontrolstudytoevaluatethebiosimilarityofql1209withperjetainhealthymalesubjects AT guocan randomizeddoubleblindparallelcontrolstudytoevaluatethebiosimilarityofql1209withperjetainhealthymalesubjects AT chenhonghui randomizeddoubleblindparallelcontrolstudytoevaluatethebiosimilarityofql1209withperjetainhealthymalesubjects AT cuichang randomizeddoubleblindparallelcontrolstudytoevaluatethebiosimilarityofql1209withperjetainhealthymalesubjects AT xiangyuxia randomizeddoubleblindparallelcontrolstudytoevaluatethebiosimilarityofql1209withperjetainhealthymalesubjects AT yangguoping randomizeddoubleblindparallelcontrolstudytoevaluatethebiosimilarityofql1209withperjetainhealthymalesubjects AT huangjie randomizeddoubleblindparallelcontrolstudytoevaluatethebiosimilarityofql1209withperjetainhealthymalesubjects |