Cargando…

Use of ‘Pharmaceutical services’ Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) in articles assessing pharmacists' interventions

BACKGROUND: Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) thesaurus contribute towards efficient searching of biomedical information. However, insufficient coverage of specific fields and inaccuracies in the indexing of articles can lead to bias during literature retrieval. OBJECTIVES: This meta-research study ai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tonin, Fernanda S., Gmünder, Vanessa, Bonetti, Aline F., Mendes, Antonio M., Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36082143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100172
_version_ 1784783415786078208
author Tonin, Fernanda S.
Gmünder, Vanessa
Bonetti, Aline F.
Mendes, Antonio M.
Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
author_facet Tonin, Fernanda S.
Gmünder, Vanessa
Bonetti, Aline F.
Mendes, Antonio M.
Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
author_sort Tonin, Fernanda S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) thesaurus contribute towards efficient searching of biomedical information. However, insufficient coverage of specific fields and inaccuracies in the indexing of articles can lead to bias during literature retrieval. OBJECTIVES: This meta-research study aimed to assess the use of ‘Pharmaceutical Services’ MeSH terms in studies evaluating the effect of pharmacists' interventions. METHODS: An updated systematic search (Jan-2022) to gather meta-analyses comparing pharmacists' interventions vs. other forms of care was performed. All MeSH terms allocated to the MEDLINE record of each primary study included in the selected meta-analyses were systematically extracted. Terms from the ‘Pharmaceutical Services’ branch, including its descendants, as well as other 26 pharmacy-specific MeSH terms were identified. The assignment of these terms as a ‘Major MeSH’ was also evaluated. Descriptive statistics and social network analyses to evaluate the co-occurrence of the MeSH terms in the articles were conducted. Sensitivity analyses including only meta-analyses with declared objectives mentioning the words ‘pharmacist’ or ‘pharmacy’ were performed (SPSS v.24.0). RESULTS: Overall, 138 meta-analyses including 2012 primary articles were evaluated. A median of 15 [IQR 12–18] MeSH terms were assigned per article with a slight positive time-trend (Spearman rho = 0.193; p < 0.001). Only 36.6% (n = 736/2012) and 58.1% (n = 338/1099) of studies were indexed with one MeSH term from the ‘Pharmaceutical Services’ branch in the overall and sensitivity analyses, respectively. In <20% of cases, these terms were a ‘Major MeSH’. The pharmacy-specific term ‘Pharmacists’ was the most frequently used, yet in only 27.8% and 47.7% of articles in the original and sensitivity analyses, respectively. Social networks showed a weak association between pharmacy-specific and ‘Pharmaceutical services’ branch MeSH terms. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of a ‘Pharmaceutical services’ branch hierarchic tree and further pharmacy-specific MeSH terms incorporated to the MeSH thesaurus in the past years is not related with accurate indexing of articles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9445408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94454082022-09-07 Use of ‘Pharmaceutical services’ Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) in articles assessing pharmacists' interventions Tonin, Fernanda S. Gmünder, Vanessa Bonetti, Aline F. Mendes, Antonio M. Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm Article BACKGROUND: Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) thesaurus contribute towards efficient searching of biomedical information. However, insufficient coverage of specific fields and inaccuracies in the indexing of articles can lead to bias during literature retrieval. OBJECTIVES: This meta-research study aimed to assess the use of ‘Pharmaceutical Services’ MeSH terms in studies evaluating the effect of pharmacists' interventions. METHODS: An updated systematic search (Jan-2022) to gather meta-analyses comparing pharmacists' interventions vs. other forms of care was performed. All MeSH terms allocated to the MEDLINE record of each primary study included in the selected meta-analyses were systematically extracted. Terms from the ‘Pharmaceutical Services’ branch, including its descendants, as well as other 26 pharmacy-specific MeSH terms were identified. The assignment of these terms as a ‘Major MeSH’ was also evaluated. Descriptive statistics and social network analyses to evaluate the co-occurrence of the MeSH terms in the articles were conducted. Sensitivity analyses including only meta-analyses with declared objectives mentioning the words ‘pharmacist’ or ‘pharmacy’ were performed (SPSS v.24.0). RESULTS: Overall, 138 meta-analyses including 2012 primary articles were evaluated. A median of 15 [IQR 12–18] MeSH terms were assigned per article with a slight positive time-trend (Spearman rho = 0.193; p < 0.001). Only 36.6% (n = 736/2012) and 58.1% (n = 338/1099) of studies were indexed with one MeSH term from the ‘Pharmaceutical Services’ branch in the overall and sensitivity analyses, respectively. In <20% of cases, these terms were a ‘Major MeSH’. The pharmacy-specific term ‘Pharmacists’ was the most frequently used, yet in only 27.8% and 47.7% of articles in the original and sensitivity analyses, respectively. Social networks showed a weak association between pharmacy-specific and ‘Pharmaceutical services’ branch MeSH terms. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of a ‘Pharmaceutical services’ branch hierarchic tree and further pharmacy-specific MeSH terms incorporated to the MeSH thesaurus in the past years is not related with accurate indexing of articles. Elsevier 2022-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9445408/ /pubmed/36082143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100172 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tonin, Fernanda S.
Gmünder, Vanessa
Bonetti, Aline F.
Mendes, Antonio M.
Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Use of ‘Pharmaceutical services’ Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) in articles assessing pharmacists' interventions
title Use of ‘Pharmaceutical services’ Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) in articles assessing pharmacists' interventions
title_full Use of ‘Pharmaceutical services’ Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) in articles assessing pharmacists' interventions
title_fullStr Use of ‘Pharmaceutical services’ Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) in articles assessing pharmacists' interventions
title_full_unstemmed Use of ‘Pharmaceutical services’ Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) in articles assessing pharmacists' interventions
title_short Use of ‘Pharmaceutical services’ Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) in articles assessing pharmacists' interventions
title_sort use of ‘pharmaceutical services’ medical subject headings (mesh) in articles assessing pharmacists' interventions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36082143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100172
work_keys_str_mv AT toninfernandas useofpharmaceuticalservicesmedicalsubjectheadingsmeshinarticlesassessingpharmacistsinterventions
AT gmundervanessa useofpharmaceuticalservicesmedicalsubjectheadingsmeshinarticlesassessingpharmacistsinterventions
AT bonettialinef useofpharmaceuticalservicesmedicalsubjectheadingsmeshinarticlesassessingpharmacistsinterventions
AT mendesantoniom useofpharmaceuticalservicesmedicalsubjectheadingsmeshinarticlesassessingpharmacistsinterventions
AT fernandezllimosfernando useofpharmaceuticalservicesmedicalsubjectheadingsmeshinarticlesassessingpharmacistsinterventions