Cargando…

Biomechanical Comparisons of Trochanteric Hip Fracture Fixation Using Short-, Mid-, and Long-Length Proximal Femoral Nails

INTRODUCTION: For trochanteric hip fractures, proximal femoral nails (PFNs) have been frequently used for surgical treatment. No study has clarified whether length of the nail affected the wiper motion; the repetitive motion of the distal nail inside canal after surgery. METHODS: Thirty synthetic fe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsumura, Tomohiro, Takahashi, Tsuneari, Ae, Ryusuke, Takeshita, Katsushi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36081841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21514593221111350
_version_ 1784783426116648960
author Matsumura, Tomohiro
Takahashi, Tsuneari
Ae, Ryusuke
Takeshita, Katsushi
author_facet Matsumura, Tomohiro
Takahashi, Tsuneari
Ae, Ryusuke
Takeshita, Katsushi
author_sort Matsumura, Tomohiro
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: For trochanteric hip fractures, proximal femoral nails (PFNs) have been frequently used for surgical treatment. No study has clarified whether length of the nail affected the wiper motion; the repetitive motion of the distal nail inside canal after surgery. METHODS: Thirty synthetic femora were used to biomechanically evaluate construct lateral angular movement of 3 different lengths of PFN [TFN-ADVANCED Proximal Femoral Nailing System (TFNA) 170 (short-length), 235 (mid-length), and 300 (long-length) mm] constructs for the fixation of stable pertrochanteric fractures. Cyclic testing and radiological evaluation were performed to investigate the loosening patterns in 3 different fixation constructs. Migration along the mechanical axis during the cyclic testing from 1-100(th), 100-500(th), 500-1000(th), 1000-1500(th), and 1500-2000(th) cycles was compared between TFNA lengths. Also, before and after cycling changes in tip to apex distance, angulation of fracture line, and lateral angular movement of the distal stem inside the canal were compared between TFNA lengths. RESULTS: Migration along the mechanical axis during cyclic loading, plus changes after cycling in tip to apex distance, and fracture line angulation did not differ between TFNA lengths for the fixation of stable intertrochanteric fracture model using synthetic femora. Conversely, one-way analysis of variance revealed a significant difference in lateral angular movement of the distal stem inside the canal after cyclic testing between groups (1.4 ± 1.6°, .21 ± .35°, and .26 ± .57° in 170-mm short nail, 235-mm middle nail, and 300-mm long nail, respectively; P = .026), and post-hoc analysis also revealed that middle nail yielded significantly less lateral angular movement compared with short nail (P = .047) but did not significantly differ from the long nail. CONCLUSIONS: Mid-length TFNA for the fixation of stable trochanteric hip fracture model using synthetic femora resulted in significantly smaller lateral angular movement of the distal stem after cyclic loading.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9445453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94454532022-09-07 Biomechanical Comparisons of Trochanteric Hip Fracture Fixation Using Short-, Mid-, and Long-Length Proximal Femoral Nails Matsumura, Tomohiro Takahashi, Tsuneari Ae, Ryusuke Takeshita, Katsushi Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Original Manuscript INTRODUCTION: For trochanteric hip fractures, proximal femoral nails (PFNs) have been frequently used for surgical treatment. No study has clarified whether length of the nail affected the wiper motion; the repetitive motion of the distal nail inside canal after surgery. METHODS: Thirty synthetic femora were used to biomechanically evaluate construct lateral angular movement of 3 different lengths of PFN [TFN-ADVANCED Proximal Femoral Nailing System (TFNA) 170 (short-length), 235 (mid-length), and 300 (long-length) mm] constructs for the fixation of stable pertrochanteric fractures. Cyclic testing and radiological evaluation were performed to investigate the loosening patterns in 3 different fixation constructs. Migration along the mechanical axis during the cyclic testing from 1-100(th), 100-500(th), 500-1000(th), 1000-1500(th), and 1500-2000(th) cycles was compared between TFNA lengths. Also, before and after cycling changes in tip to apex distance, angulation of fracture line, and lateral angular movement of the distal stem inside the canal were compared between TFNA lengths. RESULTS: Migration along the mechanical axis during cyclic loading, plus changes after cycling in tip to apex distance, and fracture line angulation did not differ between TFNA lengths for the fixation of stable intertrochanteric fracture model using synthetic femora. Conversely, one-way analysis of variance revealed a significant difference in lateral angular movement of the distal stem inside the canal after cyclic testing between groups (1.4 ± 1.6°, .21 ± .35°, and .26 ± .57° in 170-mm short nail, 235-mm middle nail, and 300-mm long nail, respectively; P = .026), and post-hoc analysis also revealed that middle nail yielded significantly less lateral angular movement compared with short nail (P = .047) but did not significantly differ from the long nail. CONCLUSIONS: Mid-length TFNA for the fixation of stable trochanteric hip fracture model using synthetic femora resulted in significantly smaller lateral angular movement of the distal stem after cyclic loading. SAGE Publications 2022-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9445453/ /pubmed/36081841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21514593221111350 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Manuscript
Matsumura, Tomohiro
Takahashi, Tsuneari
Ae, Ryusuke
Takeshita, Katsushi
Biomechanical Comparisons of Trochanteric Hip Fracture Fixation Using Short-, Mid-, and Long-Length Proximal Femoral Nails
title Biomechanical Comparisons of Trochanteric Hip Fracture Fixation Using Short-, Mid-, and Long-Length Proximal Femoral Nails
title_full Biomechanical Comparisons of Trochanteric Hip Fracture Fixation Using Short-, Mid-, and Long-Length Proximal Femoral Nails
title_fullStr Biomechanical Comparisons of Trochanteric Hip Fracture Fixation Using Short-, Mid-, and Long-Length Proximal Femoral Nails
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Comparisons of Trochanteric Hip Fracture Fixation Using Short-, Mid-, and Long-Length Proximal Femoral Nails
title_short Biomechanical Comparisons of Trochanteric Hip Fracture Fixation Using Short-, Mid-, and Long-Length Proximal Femoral Nails
title_sort biomechanical comparisons of trochanteric hip fracture fixation using short-, mid-, and long-length proximal femoral nails
topic Original Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36081841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21514593221111350
work_keys_str_mv AT matsumuratomohiro biomechanicalcomparisonsoftrochanterichipfracturefixationusingshortmidandlonglengthproximalfemoralnails
AT takahashitsuneari biomechanicalcomparisonsoftrochanterichipfracturefixationusingshortmidandlonglengthproximalfemoralnails
AT aeryusuke biomechanicalcomparisonsoftrochanterichipfracturefixationusingshortmidandlonglengthproximalfemoralnails
AT takeshitakatsushi biomechanicalcomparisonsoftrochanterichipfracturefixationusingshortmidandlonglengthproximalfemoralnails