Cargando…
Evaluation of airway obstruction by nasopharyngoscopy: comparison of the Müller maneuver versus induced sleep
The use of nasopharyngoscopy during the application of intrathoracic pressure (Müller maneuver) is frequently employed to establish the site of upper airway obstruction. The Müller maneuver, however, is used when the patient is awake and therefore may not correlate with obstruction occurring during...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18094802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30121-X |
_version_ | 1784783466219438080 |
---|---|
author | Gregório, Marcelo Gervilla Jacomelli, Márcia Figueiredo, Adelaide C. Cahali, Michel Burihan Junior, Wilson Leite Pedreira Filho, Geraldo Lorenzi |
author_facet | Gregório, Marcelo Gervilla Jacomelli, Márcia Figueiredo, Adelaide C. Cahali, Michel Burihan Junior, Wilson Leite Pedreira Filho, Geraldo Lorenzi |
author_sort | Gregório, Marcelo Gervilla |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of nasopharyngoscopy during the application of intrathoracic pressure (Müller maneuver) is frequently employed to establish the site of upper airway obstruction. The Müller maneuver, however, is used when the patient is awake and therefore may not correlate with obstruction occurring during sleep. Aim: to compare the degree of pharyngeal obstruction in the retropalatal and retroglossal regions during the Müller maneuver versus induced sleep using nasopharyngoscopy. Study design: A prospective, case series study. Material and methods: Eight patients (three males, five females), with a mean age of 48.6 +/- 9,2 year, underwent nasopharyngoscopy to assess airway anatomy and funciton during the Müller maneuver while awake and during sleep induced by drip infusion of Midazolam. Results: Retropalatal obstruction was similar during the Müller maneuver and sleep (mean + standard deviation = 3.13 +/- 0.99 and 2.75 +/- 0.46, p= 0.234). Retroglossal obstruction was significantly lower during Müller maneuver compared to sleep (mean + standard deviation 0.63 +/- 1.06 and 2.63 +/- 1.30, respectively, p= 0.005). Conclusion: The sleep inducing method was safe under the monitored conditions of this study, and detected more retroglossal obstruction than the Müller maneuver. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9445644 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94456442022-09-09 Evaluation of airway obstruction by nasopharyngoscopy: comparison of the Müller maneuver versus induced sleep Gregório, Marcelo Gervilla Jacomelli, Márcia Figueiredo, Adelaide C. Cahali, Michel Burihan Junior, Wilson Leite Pedreira Filho, Geraldo Lorenzi Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article The use of nasopharyngoscopy during the application of intrathoracic pressure (Müller maneuver) is frequently employed to establish the site of upper airway obstruction. The Müller maneuver, however, is used when the patient is awake and therefore may not correlate with obstruction occurring during sleep. Aim: to compare the degree of pharyngeal obstruction in the retropalatal and retroglossal regions during the Müller maneuver versus induced sleep using nasopharyngoscopy. Study design: A prospective, case series study. Material and methods: Eight patients (three males, five females), with a mean age of 48.6 +/- 9,2 year, underwent nasopharyngoscopy to assess airway anatomy and funciton during the Müller maneuver while awake and during sleep induced by drip infusion of Midazolam. Results: Retropalatal obstruction was similar during the Müller maneuver and sleep (mean + standard deviation = 3.13 +/- 0.99 and 2.75 +/- 0.46, p= 0.234). Retroglossal obstruction was significantly lower during Müller maneuver compared to sleep (mean + standard deviation 0.63 +/- 1.06 and 2.63 +/- 1.30, respectively, p= 0.005). Conclusion: The sleep inducing method was safe under the monitored conditions of this study, and detected more retroglossal obstruction than the Müller maneuver. Elsevier 2015-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9445644/ /pubmed/18094802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30121-X Text en . https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gregório, Marcelo Gervilla Jacomelli, Márcia Figueiredo, Adelaide C. Cahali, Michel Burihan Junior, Wilson Leite Pedreira Filho, Geraldo Lorenzi Evaluation of airway obstruction by nasopharyngoscopy: comparison of the Müller maneuver versus induced sleep |
title | Evaluation of airway obstruction by nasopharyngoscopy: comparison of the Müller maneuver versus induced sleep |
title_full | Evaluation of airway obstruction by nasopharyngoscopy: comparison of the Müller maneuver versus induced sleep |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of airway obstruction by nasopharyngoscopy: comparison of the Müller maneuver versus induced sleep |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of airway obstruction by nasopharyngoscopy: comparison of the Müller maneuver versus induced sleep |
title_short | Evaluation of airway obstruction by nasopharyngoscopy: comparison of the Müller maneuver versus induced sleep |
title_sort | evaluation of airway obstruction by nasopharyngoscopy: comparison of the müller maneuver versus induced sleep |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18094802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30121-X |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gregoriomarcelogervilla evaluationofairwayobstructionbynasopharyngoscopycomparisonofthemullermaneuverversusinducedsleep AT jacomellimarcia evaluationofairwayobstructionbynasopharyngoscopycomparisonofthemullermaneuverversusinducedsleep AT figueiredoadelaidec evaluationofairwayobstructionbynasopharyngoscopycomparisonofthemullermaneuverversusinducedsleep AT cahalimichelburihan evaluationofairwayobstructionbynasopharyngoscopycomparisonofthemullermaneuverversusinducedsleep AT juniorwilsonleitepedreira evaluationofairwayobstructionbynasopharyngoscopycomparisonofthemullermaneuverversusinducedsleep AT filhogeraldolorenzi evaluationofairwayobstructionbynasopharyngoscopycomparisonofthemullermaneuverversusinducedsleep |