Cargando…

Is there a reason for performing frontal sinus trephination at 1 cm from midline? A tomographic study.

The complex anatomy of the frontoethmoidal recess, as well as its anatomical relationship with the vital adjacent structures in the region explain the reason for considerable surgical care to protect these structures and minimize complications related to healing. Trephination is an accepted procedur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piltcher, Otavio Bejzman, Antunes, Marcelo, Monteiro, Fernanda, Schweiger, Cláudia, Schatkin, Barry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17143429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30996-4
_version_ 1784783480203247616
author Piltcher, Otavio Bejzman
Antunes, Marcelo
Monteiro, Fernanda
Schweiger, Cláudia
Schatkin, Barry
author_facet Piltcher, Otavio Bejzman
Antunes, Marcelo
Monteiro, Fernanda
Schweiger, Cláudia
Schatkin, Barry
author_sort Piltcher, Otavio Bejzman
collection PubMed
description The complex anatomy of the frontoethmoidal recess, as well as its anatomical relationship with the vital adjacent structures in the region explain the reason for considerable surgical care to protect these structures and minimize complications related to healing. Trephination is an accepted procedure to access the frontal sinus. AIM: Discuss the best location for performing frontal sinus trephination. METHODS: Measuring sinus frontal depth at 3 points equidistant to the midline (crista galli) through the axial tomographic sections. RESULTS: We measured 138 frontal sinus (69 patients). Frontal sinus depth at 0,5 cm was statistically larger than 1 cm and 1,5 cm, as well as the 1 cm trephine point was significantly larger than 1,5 cm (12,22±4,25 vs 11,78±4,65 p<0,05; 12,22±4,25 vs 10,78±5,98 p<0,001; 11,78±4,65 vs 10,78±5,98 p<0,05). The trephine set used (maximum depth of penetration of 0,7 cm) is safe to be applied in approximately 80% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Analizing the results, the trephination may be performed at variable points of the frontalsinus, but the distance of 1 cm from midline appears to be safer and shows better aestethic results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9445702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94457022022-09-09 Is there a reason for performing frontal sinus trephination at 1 cm from midline? A tomographic study. Piltcher, Otavio Bejzman Antunes, Marcelo Monteiro, Fernanda Schweiger, Cláudia Schatkin, Barry Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article The complex anatomy of the frontoethmoidal recess, as well as its anatomical relationship with the vital adjacent structures in the region explain the reason for considerable surgical care to protect these structures and minimize complications related to healing. Trephination is an accepted procedure to access the frontal sinus. AIM: Discuss the best location for performing frontal sinus trephination. METHODS: Measuring sinus frontal depth at 3 points equidistant to the midline (crista galli) through the axial tomographic sections. RESULTS: We measured 138 frontal sinus (69 patients). Frontal sinus depth at 0,5 cm was statistically larger than 1 cm and 1,5 cm, as well as the 1 cm trephine point was significantly larger than 1,5 cm (12,22±4,25 vs 11,78±4,65 p<0,05; 12,22±4,25 vs 10,78±5,98 p<0,001; 11,78±4,65 vs 10,78±5,98 p<0,05). The trephine set used (maximum depth of penetration of 0,7 cm) is safe to be applied in approximately 80% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Analizing the results, the trephination may be performed at variable points of the frontalsinus, but the distance of 1 cm from midline appears to be safer and shows better aestethic results. Elsevier 2015-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9445702/ /pubmed/17143429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30996-4 Text en . https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Piltcher, Otavio Bejzman
Antunes, Marcelo
Monteiro, Fernanda
Schweiger, Cláudia
Schatkin, Barry
Is there a reason for performing frontal sinus trephination at 1 cm from midline? A tomographic study.
title Is there a reason for performing frontal sinus trephination at 1 cm from midline? A tomographic study.
title_full Is there a reason for performing frontal sinus trephination at 1 cm from midline? A tomographic study.
title_fullStr Is there a reason for performing frontal sinus trephination at 1 cm from midline? A tomographic study.
title_full_unstemmed Is there a reason for performing frontal sinus trephination at 1 cm from midline? A tomographic study.
title_short Is there a reason for performing frontal sinus trephination at 1 cm from midline? A tomographic study.
title_sort is there a reason for performing frontal sinus trephination at 1 cm from midline? a tomographic study.
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17143429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30996-4
work_keys_str_mv AT piltcherotaviobejzman isthereareasonforperformingfrontalsinustrephinationat1cmfrommidlineatomographicstudy
AT antunesmarcelo isthereareasonforperformingfrontalsinustrephinationat1cmfrommidlineatomographicstudy
AT monteirofernanda isthereareasonforperformingfrontalsinustrephinationat1cmfrommidlineatomographicstudy
AT schweigerclaudia isthereareasonforperformingfrontalsinustrephinationat1cmfrommidlineatomographicstudy
AT schatkinbarry isthereareasonforperformingfrontalsinustrephinationat1cmfrommidlineatomographicstudy