Cargando…
Is there a reason for performing frontal sinus trephination at 1 cm from midline? A tomographic study.
The complex anatomy of the frontoethmoidal recess, as well as its anatomical relationship with the vital adjacent structures in the region explain the reason for considerable surgical care to protect these structures and minimize complications related to healing. Trephination is an accepted procedur...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17143429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30996-4 |
_version_ | 1784783480203247616 |
---|---|
author | Piltcher, Otavio Bejzman Antunes, Marcelo Monteiro, Fernanda Schweiger, Cláudia Schatkin, Barry |
author_facet | Piltcher, Otavio Bejzman Antunes, Marcelo Monteiro, Fernanda Schweiger, Cláudia Schatkin, Barry |
author_sort | Piltcher, Otavio Bejzman |
collection | PubMed |
description | The complex anatomy of the frontoethmoidal recess, as well as its anatomical relationship with the vital adjacent structures in the region explain the reason for considerable surgical care to protect these structures and minimize complications related to healing. Trephination is an accepted procedure to access the frontal sinus. AIM: Discuss the best location for performing frontal sinus trephination. METHODS: Measuring sinus frontal depth at 3 points equidistant to the midline (crista galli) through the axial tomographic sections. RESULTS: We measured 138 frontal sinus (69 patients). Frontal sinus depth at 0,5 cm was statistically larger than 1 cm and 1,5 cm, as well as the 1 cm trephine point was significantly larger than 1,5 cm (12,22±4,25 vs 11,78±4,65 p<0,05; 12,22±4,25 vs 10,78±5,98 p<0,001; 11,78±4,65 vs 10,78±5,98 p<0,05). The trephine set used (maximum depth of penetration of 0,7 cm) is safe to be applied in approximately 80% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Analizing the results, the trephination may be performed at variable points of the frontalsinus, but the distance of 1 cm from midline appears to be safer and shows better aestethic results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9445702 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94457022022-09-09 Is there a reason for performing frontal sinus trephination at 1 cm from midline? A tomographic study. Piltcher, Otavio Bejzman Antunes, Marcelo Monteiro, Fernanda Schweiger, Cláudia Schatkin, Barry Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article The complex anatomy of the frontoethmoidal recess, as well as its anatomical relationship with the vital adjacent structures in the region explain the reason for considerable surgical care to protect these structures and minimize complications related to healing. Trephination is an accepted procedure to access the frontal sinus. AIM: Discuss the best location for performing frontal sinus trephination. METHODS: Measuring sinus frontal depth at 3 points equidistant to the midline (crista galli) through the axial tomographic sections. RESULTS: We measured 138 frontal sinus (69 patients). Frontal sinus depth at 0,5 cm was statistically larger than 1 cm and 1,5 cm, as well as the 1 cm trephine point was significantly larger than 1,5 cm (12,22±4,25 vs 11,78±4,65 p<0,05; 12,22±4,25 vs 10,78±5,98 p<0,001; 11,78±4,65 vs 10,78±5,98 p<0,05). The trephine set used (maximum depth of penetration of 0,7 cm) is safe to be applied in approximately 80% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Analizing the results, the trephination may be performed at variable points of the frontalsinus, but the distance of 1 cm from midline appears to be safer and shows better aestethic results. Elsevier 2015-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9445702/ /pubmed/17143429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30996-4 Text en . https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Piltcher, Otavio Bejzman Antunes, Marcelo Monteiro, Fernanda Schweiger, Cláudia Schatkin, Barry Is there a reason for performing frontal sinus trephination at 1 cm from midline? A tomographic study. |
title | Is there a reason for performing frontal sinus trephination at 1 cm from midline? A tomographic study. |
title_full | Is there a reason for performing frontal sinus trephination at 1 cm from midline? A tomographic study. |
title_fullStr | Is there a reason for performing frontal sinus trephination at 1 cm from midline? A tomographic study. |
title_full_unstemmed | Is there a reason for performing frontal sinus trephination at 1 cm from midline? A tomographic study. |
title_short | Is there a reason for performing frontal sinus trephination at 1 cm from midline? A tomographic study. |
title_sort | is there a reason for performing frontal sinus trephination at 1 cm from midline? a tomographic study. |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17143429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30996-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT piltcherotaviobejzman isthereareasonforperformingfrontalsinustrephinationat1cmfrommidlineatomographicstudy AT antunesmarcelo isthereareasonforperformingfrontalsinustrephinationat1cmfrommidlineatomographicstudy AT monteirofernanda isthereareasonforperformingfrontalsinustrephinationat1cmfrommidlineatomographicstudy AT schweigerclaudia isthereareasonforperformingfrontalsinustrephinationat1cmfrommidlineatomographicstudy AT schatkinbarry isthereareasonforperformingfrontalsinustrephinationat1cmfrommidlineatomographicstudy |