Cargando…

Radical versus supraomohyoid neck dissection in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the inferior level of the mouth

The therapeutic paradigm for neck metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the lower level of the mouth has changed due to survival. Aim: A comparative study between radical (RND) versus selective neck dissection (SND). Material and Method: An analysis of mouth SCC in the lower level of the mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rapoport, Abrão, Ortellado, Daniel Kanabben, Amar, Ali, Lehn, Carlos Neutzling, Dedivitis, Rogério Aparecido, Perez, Ricardo Salinas, Rodrigues, Helen Mara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18094805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30124-5
_version_ 1784783480434982912
author Rapoport, Abrão
Ortellado, Daniel Kanabben
Amar, Ali
Lehn, Carlos Neutzling
Dedivitis, Rogério Aparecido
Perez, Ricardo Salinas
Rodrigues, Helen Mara
author_facet Rapoport, Abrão
Ortellado, Daniel Kanabben
Amar, Ali
Lehn, Carlos Neutzling
Dedivitis, Rogério Aparecido
Perez, Ricardo Salinas
Rodrigues, Helen Mara
author_sort Rapoport, Abrão
collection PubMed
description The therapeutic paradigm for neck metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the lower level of the mouth has changed due to survival. Aim: A comparative study between radical (RND) versus selective neck dissection (SND). Material and Method: An analysis of mouth SCC in the lower level of the mouth in 460 files from the Head & Neck and ORL Department of the Heliopolis Hospital, from 1978 to 2002. In the RND the metastathic rate in levels IV and V was assessed; in the SND the presence and site of recurrence was identified. The chi square test with the Yates correction was the chosen statistical method. Results: In the RND the metastatic rates were 5.8% (level IV) and 4.6% (level V) for cNO cases, and 9.9% (level IV) and 5.9%(level V) for cN+ cases; for level I only the rates were 11,0% for cNO cases and 5.5% for cN+ cases. In the SND the number of recurrences was 4 (4.1%) in 97 neck dissections (pNO) and 2 (10%) in 20 neck dissections (pN+). There was no advantage in using radiation compared to non-irradiated cases (5.6% and 5.7%). Conclusion: The SND may be used for SCC of the lower level of the mouth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9445703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94457032022-09-09 Radical versus supraomohyoid neck dissection in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the inferior level of the mouth Rapoport, Abrão Ortellado, Daniel Kanabben Amar, Ali Lehn, Carlos Neutzling Dedivitis, Rogério Aparecido Perez, Ricardo Salinas Rodrigues, Helen Mara Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article The therapeutic paradigm for neck metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the lower level of the mouth has changed due to survival. Aim: A comparative study between radical (RND) versus selective neck dissection (SND). Material and Method: An analysis of mouth SCC in the lower level of the mouth in 460 files from the Head & Neck and ORL Department of the Heliopolis Hospital, from 1978 to 2002. In the RND the metastathic rate in levels IV and V was assessed; in the SND the presence and site of recurrence was identified. The chi square test with the Yates correction was the chosen statistical method. Results: In the RND the metastatic rates were 5.8% (level IV) and 4.6% (level V) for cNO cases, and 9.9% (level IV) and 5.9%(level V) for cN+ cases; for level I only the rates were 11,0% for cNO cases and 5.5% for cN+ cases. In the SND the number of recurrences was 4 (4.1%) in 97 neck dissections (pNO) and 2 (10%) in 20 neck dissections (pN+). There was no advantage in using radiation compared to non-irradiated cases (5.6% and 5.7%). Conclusion: The SND may be used for SCC of the lower level of the mouth. Elsevier 2015-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9445703/ /pubmed/18094805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30124-5 Text en © Neck Surgery Department, Heliopolis Hospital, Hosphel/SP, Brazil. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Rapoport, Abrão
Ortellado, Daniel Kanabben
Amar, Ali
Lehn, Carlos Neutzling
Dedivitis, Rogério Aparecido
Perez, Ricardo Salinas
Rodrigues, Helen Mara
Radical versus supraomohyoid neck dissection in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the inferior level of the mouth
title Radical versus supraomohyoid neck dissection in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the inferior level of the mouth
title_full Radical versus supraomohyoid neck dissection in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the inferior level of the mouth
title_fullStr Radical versus supraomohyoid neck dissection in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the inferior level of the mouth
title_full_unstemmed Radical versus supraomohyoid neck dissection in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the inferior level of the mouth
title_short Radical versus supraomohyoid neck dissection in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the inferior level of the mouth
title_sort radical versus supraomohyoid neck dissection in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the inferior level of the mouth
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18094805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30124-5
work_keys_str_mv AT rapoportabrao radicalversussupraomohyoidneckdissectioninthetreatmentofsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheinferiorlevelofthemouth
AT ortelladodanielkanabben radicalversussupraomohyoidneckdissectioninthetreatmentofsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheinferiorlevelofthemouth
AT amarali radicalversussupraomohyoidneckdissectioninthetreatmentofsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheinferiorlevelofthemouth
AT lehncarlosneutzling radicalversussupraomohyoidneckdissectioninthetreatmentofsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheinferiorlevelofthemouth
AT dedivitisrogerioaparecido radicalversussupraomohyoidneckdissectioninthetreatmentofsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheinferiorlevelofthemouth
AT perezricardosalinas radicalversussupraomohyoidneckdissectioninthetreatmentofsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheinferiorlevelofthemouth
AT rodrigueshelenmara radicalversussupraomohyoidneckdissectioninthetreatmentofsquamouscellcarcinomaoftheinferiorlevelofthemouth