Cargando…

Predictive risk factors of complications in reduction mammoplasty—analysis of three different pedicles

BACKGROUND: Reduction mammoplasty can be performed in several different techniques. Understanding the complication profile and risk factors in different reduction methods can help in choosing a technique, which serves the patient best. The authors present their experience of three different reductio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palve, Johanna, Kuuskeri, Marika, Luukkaala, Tiina, Suorsa, Eija
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36082101
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-116
_version_ 1784783482134724608
author Palve, Johanna
Kuuskeri, Marika
Luukkaala, Tiina
Suorsa, Eija
author_facet Palve, Johanna
Kuuskeri, Marika
Luukkaala, Tiina
Suorsa, Eija
author_sort Palve, Johanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reduction mammoplasty can be performed in several different techniques. Understanding the complication profile and risk factors in different reduction methods can help in choosing a technique, which serves the patient best. The authors present their experience of three different reduction techniques [superomedial pedicle (SMP), superior pedicle (SP) and inferior pedicle (IP)] with an emphasis on predictors of complications. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of breast reductions between 2014 and 2020 was performed. Patient’s demographics [age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, smoking, nipple to sternal notch distance (N-SN)], operative details (pedicle, tissue resected, drains, operating surgeon) and complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification were assessed. Study variables were compared against overall complication rates for the three techniques. RESULTS: In total, 760 patients underwent reduction mammoplasty, including 578 (76%) bilateral and 182 (24%) unilateral operations. Of patients, 477 (63%) were operated with SMP, 201 (26%) with IP and 82 (11%) with SP. An average weight of resected tissue per breast was 460 g. Overall complication rate was 38%. The rate was higher in IP group (50%) compared to SMP (36%) and SP (22%) groups (P<0.001). Complications were mainly minor and related to delayed wound healing. The rate for major complications was 4%. Multivariable analysis showed that complications were associated independently with IP [odds ratio (OR) 1.89, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.33–2.69], age <50 years (OR 1.87, 95% CI: 1.32–2.65), bilateral operation (OR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.00–2.76) and resected tissue weight ≥650 g per breast (OR 2.02, 95% CI: 1.36–2.99). Each factor contributed 1 point in the creation of a risk-scoring system. The overall complication rate was increased as the presence of statistically significant risk factors (IP, age <50, bilateral operation and/or resected tissue ≥650 g per breast) increased (31%, 38%, 59% and 90% for number of 1, 2, 3 and 4 risk factors respectively, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of complication can be predicted by a risk-scoring system. In increasing variety of patients undergoing reduction mammoplasty, careful consideration of the best operation technique is important to prevent complications and costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9445710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94457102022-09-07 Predictive risk factors of complications in reduction mammoplasty—analysis of three different pedicles Palve, Johanna Kuuskeri, Marika Luukkaala, Tiina Suorsa, Eija Gland Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Reduction mammoplasty can be performed in several different techniques. Understanding the complication profile and risk factors in different reduction methods can help in choosing a technique, which serves the patient best. The authors present their experience of three different reduction techniques [superomedial pedicle (SMP), superior pedicle (SP) and inferior pedicle (IP)] with an emphasis on predictors of complications. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of breast reductions between 2014 and 2020 was performed. Patient’s demographics [age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, smoking, nipple to sternal notch distance (N-SN)], operative details (pedicle, tissue resected, drains, operating surgeon) and complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification were assessed. Study variables were compared against overall complication rates for the three techniques. RESULTS: In total, 760 patients underwent reduction mammoplasty, including 578 (76%) bilateral and 182 (24%) unilateral operations. Of patients, 477 (63%) were operated with SMP, 201 (26%) with IP and 82 (11%) with SP. An average weight of resected tissue per breast was 460 g. Overall complication rate was 38%. The rate was higher in IP group (50%) compared to SMP (36%) and SP (22%) groups (P<0.001). Complications were mainly minor and related to delayed wound healing. The rate for major complications was 4%. Multivariable analysis showed that complications were associated independently with IP [odds ratio (OR) 1.89, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.33–2.69], age <50 years (OR 1.87, 95% CI: 1.32–2.65), bilateral operation (OR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.00–2.76) and resected tissue weight ≥650 g per breast (OR 2.02, 95% CI: 1.36–2.99). Each factor contributed 1 point in the creation of a risk-scoring system. The overall complication rate was increased as the presence of statistically significant risk factors (IP, age <50, bilateral operation and/or resected tissue ≥650 g per breast) increased (31%, 38%, 59% and 90% for number of 1, 2, 3 and 4 risk factors respectively, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of complication can be predicted by a risk-scoring system. In increasing variety of patients undergoing reduction mammoplasty, careful consideration of the best operation technique is important to prevent complications and costs. AME Publishing Company 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9445710/ /pubmed/36082101 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-116 Text en 2022 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Palve, Johanna
Kuuskeri, Marika
Luukkaala, Tiina
Suorsa, Eija
Predictive risk factors of complications in reduction mammoplasty—analysis of three different pedicles
title Predictive risk factors of complications in reduction mammoplasty—analysis of three different pedicles
title_full Predictive risk factors of complications in reduction mammoplasty—analysis of three different pedicles
title_fullStr Predictive risk factors of complications in reduction mammoplasty—analysis of three different pedicles
title_full_unstemmed Predictive risk factors of complications in reduction mammoplasty—analysis of three different pedicles
title_short Predictive risk factors of complications in reduction mammoplasty—analysis of three different pedicles
title_sort predictive risk factors of complications in reduction mammoplasty—analysis of three different pedicles
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36082101
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gs-22-116
work_keys_str_mv AT palvejohanna predictiveriskfactorsofcomplicationsinreductionmammoplastyanalysisofthreedifferentpedicles
AT kuuskerimarika predictiveriskfactorsofcomplicationsinreductionmammoplastyanalysisofthreedifferentpedicles
AT luukkaalatiina predictiveriskfactorsofcomplicationsinreductionmammoplastyanalysisofthreedifferentpedicles
AT suorsaeija predictiveriskfactorsofcomplicationsinreductionmammoplastyanalysisofthreedifferentpedicles